Thromboxane synthetase inhibitors in septic shock.

Advances in shock research Pub Date : 1983-01-01
B L Short, W M Gardiner, A N Mishik, P W Ramwell, D Walker, J R Fletcher
{"title":"Thromboxane synthetase inhibitors in septic shock.","authors":"B L Short,&nbsp;W M Gardiner,&nbsp;A N Mishik,&nbsp;P W Ramwell,&nbsp;D Walker,&nbsp;J R Fletcher","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Thromboxane (TX) has been reported to cause mortality in endotoxin or septic shock. Cyclooxygenase inhibition improves survival in gram-negative or gram-positive shock. The exact level in the prostaglandin system of which the protection occurs is unknown. This study was designed to compare the effects of a cyclooxygenase inhibitor (indomethacin, IND) to a thromboxane synthetase inhibitor (IMI) on survival and on the production of Tx and prostacyclin (PGI2) in a clinically relevant rat gram-negative sepsis model. Three groups were studied: 1) control (N = 35) animals received E coli only; 2) IND (N = 35) treated animals received 3 mg/kg IP; 3) IMI (N = 35) treated animals received 30 mg/kg IP. All drugs were given 1 h after an IP injection of E coli (LD70) organisms. In this model only IND significantly improved survival. IND and IMI significantly blocked the production of Tx seen in septic shock. IND blocked PGI2 production whereas IMI increased the production. These results show that Tx may not be important in the irreversible stages of shock. Shunting prostaglandin production to PGI2 with thromboxane synthetase inhibitors needs to be considered when using this group of compounds. The mechanism of protection by IND remains unknown.</p>","PeriodicalId":75453,"journal":{"name":"Advances in shock research","volume":"10 ","pages":"143-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1983-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in shock research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Thromboxane (TX) has been reported to cause mortality in endotoxin or septic shock. Cyclooxygenase inhibition improves survival in gram-negative or gram-positive shock. The exact level in the prostaglandin system of which the protection occurs is unknown. This study was designed to compare the effects of a cyclooxygenase inhibitor (indomethacin, IND) to a thromboxane synthetase inhibitor (IMI) on survival and on the production of Tx and prostacyclin (PGI2) in a clinically relevant rat gram-negative sepsis model. Three groups were studied: 1) control (N = 35) animals received E coli only; 2) IND (N = 35) treated animals received 3 mg/kg IP; 3) IMI (N = 35) treated animals received 30 mg/kg IP. All drugs were given 1 h after an IP injection of E coli (LD70) organisms. In this model only IND significantly improved survival. IND and IMI significantly blocked the production of Tx seen in septic shock. IND blocked PGI2 production whereas IMI increased the production. These results show that Tx may not be important in the irreversible stages of shock. Shunting prostaglandin production to PGI2 with thromboxane synthetase inhibitors needs to be considered when using this group of compounds. The mechanism of protection by IND remains unknown.

血栓素合成酶抑制剂在感染性休克中的应用。
血栓素(TX)已被报道在内毒素或感染性休克中引起死亡。环加氧酶抑制可提高革兰氏阴性或革兰氏阳性休克患者的生存率。前列腺素系统中产生保护作用的确切水平尚不清楚。本研究旨在比较一种环氧化酶抑制剂(吲哚美辛,IND)和一种血栓素合成酶抑制剂(IMI)对临床相关的革兰氏阴性脓毒症模型大鼠的生存和Tx和prostacyclin (PGI2)产生的影响。试验分为三组:1)对照组(N = 35)只注射大肠杆菌;2)试验组(N = 35)给予3 mg/kg IP;3) IMI (N = 35)处理动物给予30 mg/kg IP。所有药物均在大肠杆菌(LD70)微生物IP注射1 h后给予。在这个模型中,只有IND显著提高了生存率。IND和IMI明显阻断脓毒性休克中Tx的产生。IND抑制了PGI2的产生,而IMI则增加了PGI2的产生。这些结果表明,在冲击的不可逆阶段,Tx可能并不重要。在使用这类化合物时,需要考虑使用血栓素合成酶抑制剂将前列腺素的生成分流到PGI2。IND的保护机制尚不清楚。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书