{"title":"[Usefulness of the HHM complaint list (Hamburg-Heidelberg-Munich complaint list)].","authors":"V Hobi, U Gerhard","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A study on the Hamburg-Heidelberg-München complaint-list (HHM, v. Zerssen, 1976) raised the question of the clinical usefulness of an overall summation score. 2 samples (215 patients, 326 healthy subjects) participated; emphasis was mainly on patients. From the results obtained through factor analysis the interpretation of a single factor-solution (general factor) is justified. This factor correlated highly with the \"neuroticism-\", \"depression-\", and \"general well-being\"-dimensions in inventories like FPI, GT and PND-S. The rotated factor matrix (mineigen greater than or equal to 1) permits a reasonable interpretation of 6 factors. The first and partly the second factor represent domains like mood, well-being and drive (factor I: gloomy, depressive mood; factor II: exhaustion, fatigue). Distinctive somatic complaints are muscle and joint pains , breathing and swallowing difficulties, and (less pronounced) gastro-intestinal and urogenital pains. The suggestion and proceeding of other authors is supported, to improve the usefulness of such an inventory by extending distinct somatic-psychosomatic complaints.</p>","PeriodicalId":21430,"journal":{"name":"Schweizer Archiv fur Neurologie, Neurochirurgie und Psychiatrie = Archives suisses de neurologie, neurochirurgie et de psychiatrie","volume":"133 2","pages":"311-20"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1983-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Schweizer Archiv fur Neurologie, Neurochirurgie und Psychiatrie = Archives suisses de neurologie, neurochirurgie et de psychiatrie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
A study on the Hamburg-Heidelberg-München complaint-list (HHM, v. Zerssen, 1976) raised the question of the clinical usefulness of an overall summation score. 2 samples (215 patients, 326 healthy subjects) participated; emphasis was mainly on patients. From the results obtained through factor analysis the interpretation of a single factor-solution (general factor) is justified. This factor correlated highly with the "neuroticism-", "depression-", and "general well-being"-dimensions in inventories like FPI, GT and PND-S. The rotated factor matrix (mineigen greater than or equal to 1) permits a reasonable interpretation of 6 factors. The first and partly the second factor represent domains like mood, well-being and drive (factor I: gloomy, depressive mood; factor II: exhaustion, fatigue). Distinctive somatic complaints are muscle and joint pains , breathing and swallowing difficulties, and (less pronounced) gastro-intestinal and urogenital pains. The suggestion and proceeding of other authors is supported, to improve the usefulness of such an inventory by extending distinct somatic-psychosomatic complaints.
一项关于汉堡-海德堡-深圳投诉清单的研究(HHM, v. Zerssen, 1976)提出了总体总结评分的临床实用性问题。2个样本(215名患者,326名健康受试者)参与;重点主要放在患者身上。从因子分析的结果来看,单因子解(一般因子)的解释是合理的。这个因素与FPI、GT和PND-S等量表中的“神经质”、“抑郁”和“总体幸福感”维度高度相关。旋转因子矩阵(大于或等于1)允许对6个因子进行合理解释。第一个因素和部分第二个因素代表了情绪、幸福感和驱动力等领域(因素一:阴郁、抑郁情绪;因素二:疲惫、疲劳)。明显的躯体主诉有肌肉和关节痛,呼吸和吞咽困难,以及(不太明显的)胃肠道和泌尿生殖系统疼痛。支持其他作者的建议和程序,通过扩展不同的躯体-心身疾患来提高这种清单的有用性。