Chiasmatic gliomas of childhood. A reappraisal of natural history and effectiveness of cranial irradiation.

Child's brain Pub Date : 1983-01-01
R J Packer, P J Savino, L T Bilaniuk, R A Zimmerman, N J Schatz, J G Rosenstock, D S Nelson, P D Jarrett, D A Bruce, L Schut
{"title":"Chiasmatic gliomas of childhood. A reappraisal of natural history and effectiveness of cranial irradiation.","authors":"R J Packer,&nbsp;P J Savino,&nbsp;L T Bilaniuk,&nbsp;R A Zimmerman,&nbsp;N J Schatz,&nbsp;J G Rosenstock,&nbsp;D S Nelson,&nbsp;P D Jarrett,&nbsp;D A Bruce,&nbsp;L Schut","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Disagreement exists concerning the natural history and treatment of chiasmatic gliomas (CG) of childhood. We reviewed our experience in 21 cases of surgically verified CG with a median age of 4 years at time of diagnosis, followed for a median of 5.3 years (range 3-14.8 years). Initial treatment included radiation therapy (RT) in 18 patients, chemotherapy in 2, and observation in 1. Disease recurrence, defined as progressive visual or neurological deterioration, was documented in 10 children (48%), occurring at a median of 6 years after diagnosis. 5-year actuarial survival was 89%, but fell to 60% by 10 years. Visual improvement after RT was uncommon, occurring once. Intellectual deficits were noted in 5 of 17 survivors. We compared our results to that of other patients reported and concluded that: (1) CG may act aggressively independent of their location in the visual pathway at time of diagnosis; (2) the beneficial effects of RT are difficult to document; (3) progressive disease may occur late in the course of illness, and (4) intellectual sequelae are common in long-term survivors.</p>","PeriodicalId":9836,"journal":{"name":"Child's brain","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1983-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Child's brain","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Disagreement exists concerning the natural history and treatment of chiasmatic gliomas (CG) of childhood. We reviewed our experience in 21 cases of surgically verified CG with a median age of 4 years at time of diagnosis, followed for a median of 5.3 years (range 3-14.8 years). Initial treatment included radiation therapy (RT) in 18 patients, chemotherapy in 2, and observation in 1. Disease recurrence, defined as progressive visual or neurological deterioration, was documented in 10 children (48%), occurring at a median of 6 years after diagnosis. 5-year actuarial survival was 89%, but fell to 60% by 10 years. Visual improvement after RT was uncommon, occurring once. Intellectual deficits were noted in 5 of 17 survivors. We compared our results to that of other patients reported and concluded that: (1) CG may act aggressively independent of their location in the visual pathway at time of diagnosis; (2) the beneficial effects of RT are difficult to document; (3) progressive disease may occur late in the course of illness, and (4) intellectual sequelae are common in long-term survivors.

儿童交叉神经胶质瘤。对颅脑照射的自然历史和有效性的重新评价。
关于儿童交叉神经胶质瘤(CG)的自然历史和治疗存在分歧。我们回顾了21例手术证实的CG病例的经验,诊断时中位年龄为4岁,随访中位年龄为5.3岁(范围3-14.8岁)。初始治疗包括18例放疗,2例化疗,1例观察。疾病复发,定义为进行性视觉或神经退化,在10名儿童(48%)中记录,发生在诊断后6年的中位数。5年精算生存率为89%,但10年后降至60%。术后视力改善不常见,只发生一次。17名幸存者中有5人存在智力缺陷。我们将我们的结果与其他患者报告的结果进行了比较,并得出结论:(1)CG可能在诊断时独立于其在视觉通路中的位置而具有侵略性;(2) RT的有益效果难以记录;(3)病程晚期可出现进行性疾病,(4)智力后遗症常见于长期存活者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信