[Operationalized diagnosis of schizoaffective and cycloid psychoses].

M Zaudig, G Vogl
{"title":"[Operationalized diagnosis of schizoaffective and cycloid psychoses].","authors":"M Zaudig,&nbsp;G Vogl","doi":"10.1007/BF00346089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Case histories of 128 patients suffering from functional psychoses were evaluated. The operational definitions for schizoaffective psychoses (SAP) of Kendell, Welner, Spitzer (RDC) and Feighner were applied. Of the 30 cases of SAP based on ICD 8 (295.7), Kendell's criteria were fulfilled in 97% Welner's in 77%, Spitzer's in 70% and Feighner's in 30%. The highly sensitive criteria of Kendell are best qualified for delineating the schizoaffective (sa) syndroms, but have the disadvantage of not requiring a time limitation when examining the longitudinal course of the illness. In this respect, the Welner criteria which also demonstrate high sensitivity were found to be more appropriate for the disease concept of the ICD 8. When using the schizoaffective criteria, a striking overlap was found with catatonic schizophrenia (Kendell and Welner diagnosed 33% as sa), paranoid schizophrenia (Spitzer 39%, Kendell and Welner 28%) and mania (Kendell and Welner 50% sa diagnoses). Of the SAP only 30% satisfied Perris' criteria for cycloid psychoses. Except for catatonic schizophrenia (47% overlap), the cycloid psychoses could be well distinguished from the other psychoses. cycloid psychoses therefore should not form a subgroup of the SAP. Kendell's criteria were found to be best qualified for the determination of the schizoaffective group. A higher specificity of the disease concept SAP may be achieved if we use time limitations such as Welner's. To avoid placing cycloid psychoses in the SAP category, the Perris criteria should be applied. Because of their high specificity, the criteria of Feighner and Spitzer were found to be inappropriate. In DSM-III the definition of \"psychotic disorders not elsewhere classified\" is weak. It lacks an operational definition for SAP so that DSM-III was not used for this investigation. In order to obtain a more homogeneous population not only in the schizoaffective group, but also in both of the two major psychoses, we find it legitimate to maintain the schizoaffective group and, at the same time, recognize the exceptional position of cycloid psychoses as separate groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":55482,"journal":{"name":"Archiv Fur Psychiatrie Und Nervenkrankheiten","volume":"233 5","pages":"385-96"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1983-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/BF00346089","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archiv Fur Psychiatrie Und Nervenkrankheiten","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00346089","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Case histories of 128 patients suffering from functional psychoses were evaluated. The operational definitions for schizoaffective psychoses (SAP) of Kendell, Welner, Spitzer (RDC) and Feighner were applied. Of the 30 cases of SAP based on ICD 8 (295.7), Kendell's criteria were fulfilled in 97% Welner's in 77%, Spitzer's in 70% and Feighner's in 30%. The highly sensitive criteria of Kendell are best qualified for delineating the schizoaffective (sa) syndroms, but have the disadvantage of not requiring a time limitation when examining the longitudinal course of the illness. In this respect, the Welner criteria which also demonstrate high sensitivity were found to be more appropriate for the disease concept of the ICD 8. When using the schizoaffective criteria, a striking overlap was found with catatonic schizophrenia (Kendell and Welner diagnosed 33% as sa), paranoid schizophrenia (Spitzer 39%, Kendell and Welner 28%) and mania (Kendell and Welner 50% sa diagnoses). Of the SAP only 30% satisfied Perris' criteria for cycloid psychoses. Except for catatonic schizophrenia (47% overlap), the cycloid psychoses could be well distinguished from the other psychoses. cycloid psychoses therefore should not form a subgroup of the SAP. Kendell's criteria were found to be best qualified for the determination of the schizoaffective group. A higher specificity of the disease concept SAP may be achieved if we use time limitations such as Welner's. To avoid placing cycloid psychoses in the SAP category, the Perris criteria should be applied. Because of their high specificity, the criteria of Feighner and Spitzer were found to be inappropriate. In DSM-III the definition of "psychotic disorders not elsewhere classified" is weak. It lacks an operational definition for SAP so that DSM-III was not used for this investigation. In order to obtain a more homogeneous population not only in the schizoaffective group, but also in both of the two major psychoses, we find it legitimate to maintain the schizoaffective group and, at the same time, recognize the exceptional position of cycloid psychoses as separate groups.

[分裂情感性和摆线型精神病的操作化诊断]。
对128例功能性精神病患者的病史进行分析。应用kendel, Welner, Spitzer (RDC)和Feighner对分裂情感性精神病(SAP)的操作定义。在基于ICD 8的30例SAP(295.7例)中,符合Kendell标准的占97%,符合Welner标准的占77%,符合Spitzer标准的占70%,符合Feighner标准的占30%。高度敏感的肯德尔标准最适合描述分裂情感性(sa)综合征,但缺点是在检查疾病的纵向病程时不需要时间限制。在这方面,发现同样具有高灵敏度的Welner标准更适合ICD 8的疾病概念。当使用分裂情感标准时,发现紧张型精神分裂症(肯德尔和威尔纳诊断为33%的sa),偏执型精神分裂症(斯皮策39%,肯德尔和威尔纳28%)和躁狂症(肯德尔和威尔纳50%的sa诊断)有惊人的重叠。在SAP患者中,只有30%符合佩里斯的摆线精神病标准。除紧张性精神分裂症(47%重叠)外,摆线型精神病与其他精神病可以很好地区分。因此,摆线型精神病不应成为SAP的一个亚组。肯德尔的标准被认为是确定分裂情感性组的最佳标准。如果我们使用诸如Welner's的时间限制,则可以实现更高特异性的疾病概念SAP。为避免将摆线精神病归为SAP类,应采用Perris标准。由于Feighner和Spitzer的高特异性,他们的标准被发现是不合适的。在DSM-III中,“其他地方未分类的精神障碍”的定义很弱。它缺乏SAP的操作定义,因此DSM-III没有用于此调查。为了获得更均匀的群体,不仅在分裂情感组,而且在两种主要精神病中,我们发现维持分裂情感组是合理的,同时,承认摆线精神病作为单独群体的特殊地位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信