Bursal and thymic reticular epithelial cells in the chicken: preparation of in vitro monolayer cultures.

R L Boyd, H A Ward, H K Muller
{"title":"Bursal and thymic reticular epithelial cells in the chicken: preparation of in vitro monolayer cultures.","authors":"R L Boyd,&nbsp;H A Ward,&nbsp;H K Muller","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To study the nature of reticular epithelial (REp) cells and their role in the specific microenvironments of the chicken bursa and thymus, a method was developed for the in vitro culture of purified preparations of these cells. For comparison, similar cultures of splenic adherent cells were also performed. REp cell-rich bursa medullary follicles and mildly trypsinized thymic fragments were X-irradiated (850 rad) to eliminate remaining lymphocytes and transferred to culture flasks. In bursal cultures, after 2-4 days incubation the basement membrane (BM) encapsulating the follicles disrupted and the immediately underlying epithelial cells grew out as a monolayer. By 10 days, REp cells at the periphery developed cytoplasmic processes; occasionally these cells appeared to \"bud-off\" and grow as isolated dendritic cells. Thymic REp cells were generally slower to proliferate but formed a monolayer by 10-14 days. Splenic adherent cells developed extensive growth within 4 days. REp cells were distinguished from fibroblasts, when present, morphologically and by their limited phagocytic ability. The former were also periodic acid-Sciffs reagent (PAS)-positive and produced reticulin granules. Bursal REp cells were also positive for a gut-associated mucin, but this may have been bound in vivo prior to culture. Neither T nor B lymphocyte-specific antigens were detectable on the cultured REp cells or splenic adherent cells, but they were all rich in cytoplasmic actin. A major feature of REp cells to emerge in this study was the obvious presence of subpopulations of these cells, which raises important questions as to their exact nature and lineage. The accompanying paper details the ability of the bursal and thymic REp cell cultures to induce B-or T-lymphocyte differentiation, respectively, in vitro.</p>","PeriodicalId":17481,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Reticuloendothelial Society","volume":"34 5","pages":"371-82"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1983-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Reticuloendothelial Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To study the nature of reticular epithelial (REp) cells and their role in the specific microenvironments of the chicken bursa and thymus, a method was developed for the in vitro culture of purified preparations of these cells. For comparison, similar cultures of splenic adherent cells were also performed. REp cell-rich bursa medullary follicles and mildly trypsinized thymic fragments were X-irradiated (850 rad) to eliminate remaining lymphocytes and transferred to culture flasks. In bursal cultures, after 2-4 days incubation the basement membrane (BM) encapsulating the follicles disrupted and the immediately underlying epithelial cells grew out as a monolayer. By 10 days, REp cells at the periphery developed cytoplasmic processes; occasionally these cells appeared to "bud-off" and grow as isolated dendritic cells. Thymic REp cells were generally slower to proliferate but formed a monolayer by 10-14 days. Splenic adherent cells developed extensive growth within 4 days. REp cells were distinguished from fibroblasts, when present, morphologically and by their limited phagocytic ability. The former were also periodic acid-Sciffs reagent (PAS)-positive and produced reticulin granules. Bursal REp cells were also positive for a gut-associated mucin, but this may have been bound in vivo prior to culture. Neither T nor B lymphocyte-specific antigens were detectable on the cultured REp cells or splenic adherent cells, but they were all rich in cytoplasmic actin. A major feature of REp cells to emerge in this study was the obvious presence of subpopulations of these cells, which raises important questions as to their exact nature and lineage. The accompanying paper details the ability of the bursal and thymic REp cell cultures to induce B-or T-lymphocyte differentiation, respectively, in vitro.

鸡法氏囊和胸腺网状上皮细胞:体外单层培养的制备。
为了研究网状上皮细胞(REp)的性质及其在鸡法氏囊和胸腺特定微环境中的作用,建立了一种体外培养纯化这些细胞的方法。为了比较,我们也进行了类似的脾贴壁细胞培养。富REp细胞的囊髓滤泡和轻度胰蛋白酶化的胸腺碎片经x射线照射(850 rad)以消除剩余淋巴细胞并转移到培养瓶中。在法氏囊培养中,经过2-4天的培养,包裹卵泡的基底膜(BM)被破坏,紧接着下面的上皮细胞生长成单层。10 d时,外周REp细胞出现细胞质突起;偶尔,这些细胞出现“萌芽”并生长为分离的树突状细胞。胸腺REp细胞一般增殖较慢,但在10-14天形成单层。脾贴壁细胞在4天内广泛生长。REp细胞在形态上和有限的吞噬能力上与成纤维细胞区别开来。前者也呈周期性酸-席夫斯试剂(PAS)阳性,并产生网状蛋白颗粒。法氏囊REp细胞也呈肠相关粘蛋白阳性,但这可能是在培养前在体内结合的。培养的REp细胞和脾贴壁细胞均未检出T和B淋巴细胞特异性抗原,但均含有丰富的胞浆肌动蛋白。在这项研究中出现的REp细胞的一个主要特征是这些细胞的亚群的明显存在,这提出了关于它们的确切性质和谱系的重要问题。随附的论文详细介绍了法氏囊和胸腺REp细胞培养在体外分别诱导b淋巴细胞或t淋巴细胞分化的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信