Lymphocyte recognition of lymph node high endothelium: adhesive interactions determining entry into lymph nodes.

Kroc Foundation series Pub Date : 1984-01-01
J J Woodruff, Y H Chin
{"title":"Lymphocyte recognition of lymph node high endothelium: adhesive interactions determining entry into lymph nodes.","authors":"J J Woodruff,&nbsp;Y H Chin","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Our interpretation of these results is that lymphocyte surface HEBF is composed of high endothelial adhesion molecules which mediate cell-cell interactions that result in lymphocyte entry from blood into lymph nodes. The evidence that anti-HEBF antibody does not interfere with lymphocyte entry into PP is intriguing, since migration into this tissue as well as LN, occurs via HEV. This suggests that high endothelial cells differ in LN and PP at least with respect to the specificity of surface molecules involved in lymphocyte adherence. It could be that separate lymphocyte subpopulations express receptors for these two types of high endothelium. If this explanation is correct, then cells negatively selected using this antibody should be capable of binding to HEV of PP but not HEV of LN. However, if receptors for both high endothelial types are present on the same lymphocyte, then it is unlikely that such selection would yield cells exhibiting tissue specificity. Our observations are consistent with previous findings which suggested that high endothelial cells of mouse LN and PP exhibit differences in lymphocyte binding properties. For example, it has been reported that certain murine lymphomas bind to HEV of either peripheral LN or PP and that, to a limited degree, this preference is a property of most B and T cells [Butcher et al, 1980; Stevens et al, 1982]. Thymus and bone marrow cells show only low levels of HEV binding and less than 10% of such cells react with anti-HEBF antibody. During differentiation lymphocytes appear to acquire surface components which mediate high endothelial adhesion and this event is associated with the appearance of surface molecules recognized by anti-HEBF antibody. This suggests that it is the expression of these surface molecules during differentiation which confers high endothelial recognition properties on lymphocytes and that this mechanism plays a role in adhesive interactions leading to entry of both T and B cells into LN.</p>","PeriodicalId":77744,"journal":{"name":"Kroc Foundation series","volume":"16 ","pages":"255-68"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1984-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kroc Foundation series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Our interpretation of these results is that lymphocyte surface HEBF is composed of high endothelial adhesion molecules which mediate cell-cell interactions that result in lymphocyte entry from blood into lymph nodes. The evidence that anti-HEBF antibody does not interfere with lymphocyte entry into PP is intriguing, since migration into this tissue as well as LN, occurs via HEV. This suggests that high endothelial cells differ in LN and PP at least with respect to the specificity of surface molecules involved in lymphocyte adherence. It could be that separate lymphocyte subpopulations express receptors for these two types of high endothelium. If this explanation is correct, then cells negatively selected using this antibody should be capable of binding to HEV of PP but not HEV of LN. However, if receptors for both high endothelial types are present on the same lymphocyte, then it is unlikely that such selection would yield cells exhibiting tissue specificity. Our observations are consistent with previous findings which suggested that high endothelial cells of mouse LN and PP exhibit differences in lymphocyte binding properties. For example, it has been reported that certain murine lymphomas bind to HEV of either peripheral LN or PP and that, to a limited degree, this preference is a property of most B and T cells [Butcher et al, 1980; Stevens et al, 1982]. Thymus and bone marrow cells show only low levels of HEV binding and less than 10% of such cells react with anti-HEBF antibody. During differentiation lymphocytes appear to acquire surface components which mediate high endothelial adhesion and this event is associated with the appearance of surface molecules recognized by anti-HEBF antibody. This suggests that it is the expression of these surface molecules during differentiation which confers high endothelial recognition properties on lymphocytes and that this mechanism plays a role in adhesive interactions leading to entry of both T and B cells into LN.

淋巴细胞对淋巴结高内皮细胞的识别:粘附相互作用决定进入淋巴结。
我们对这些结果的解释是淋巴细胞表面HEBF由高内皮粘附分子组成,这些分子介导细胞间相互作用,导致淋巴细胞从血液进入淋巴结。抗hebf抗体不干扰淋巴细胞进入PP的证据是有趣的,因为迁移到该组织和LN发生通过HEV。这表明,高内皮细胞的LN和PP至少在参与淋巴细胞粘附的表面分子的特异性方面有所不同。这可能是不同的淋巴细胞亚群表达这两种高内皮细胞的受体。如果这种解释是正确的,那么使用这种抗体负选择的细胞应该能够与PP型HEV结合,而不是与LN型HEV结合。然而,如果两种高内皮类型的受体同时存在于同一淋巴细胞上,那么这种选择就不太可能产生具有组织特异性的细胞。我们的观察结果与先前的研究结果一致,表明小鼠LN和PP的高内皮细胞在淋巴细胞结合特性上存在差异。例如,据报道,某些小鼠淋巴瘤与周围LN或PP的HEV结合,并且在有限程度上,这种偏好是大多数B细胞和T细胞的特性[Butcher等,1980;Stevens等人,1982]。胸腺和骨髓细胞仅显示出低水平的HEV结合,并且不到10%的此类细胞与抗hebf抗体反应。在分化过程中,淋巴细胞似乎获得了介导内皮细胞高度粘附的表面成分,这一事件与抗hebf抗体识别的表面分子的出现有关。这表明,正是这些表面分子在分化过程中的表达赋予了淋巴细胞高度的内皮细胞识别特性,并且这种机制在导致T细胞和B细胞进入LN的粘附相互作用中起作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信