A comparison of PO2 monitoring techniques in newborn infants.

Australian paediatric journal Pub Date : 1984-11-01
I G Lewis, R R Haslam
{"title":"A comparison of PO2 monitoring techniques in newborn infants.","authors":"I G Lewis,&nbsp;R R Haslam","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study is an evaluation of different methods of PO2 monitoring in newborn infants. These were an intravascular PO2 electrode (Searle Life Support Systems); transcutaneous monitoring (Kontron and Hewlett-Packard); and arterialized capillary blood samples. Values of each were compared with simultaneous aortic sample values and their correlation compared. The Searle electrode and TCM were found to be of equivalent accuracy overall, although the Searle was less reliable. Searle catheters were more difficult to insert than normal catheters, with a high wastage. Arterialized capillary PO2 values did not correlate with arterial. Transcutaneous monitoring is the most reliable and cheapest method.</p>","PeriodicalId":75574,"journal":{"name":"Australian paediatric journal","volume":"20 4","pages":"309-11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1984-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian paediatric journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study is an evaluation of different methods of PO2 monitoring in newborn infants. These were an intravascular PO2 electrode (Searle Life Support Systems); transcutaneous monitoring (Kontron and Hewlett-Packard); and arterialized capillary blood samples. Values of each were compared with simultaneous aortic sample values and their correlation compared. The Searle electrode and TCM were found to be of equivalent accuracy overall, although the Searle was less reliable. Searle catheters were more difficult to insert than normal catheters, with a high wastage. Arterialized capillary PO2 values did not correlate with arterial. Transcutaneous monitoring is the most reliable and cheapest method.

新生儿PO2监测技术的比较。
本研究对新生儿PO2监测的不同方法进行了评价。这些是血管内PO2电极(Searle生命支持系统);经皮监测(Kontron和Hewlett-Packard);动脉化的毛细血管血样。分别与同期主动脉样本值进行比较,并比较其相关性。虽然Searle电极的可靠性较低,但总的来说,Searle电极和TCM具有相同的准确性。Searle导管比普通导管更难插入,且损耗大。动脉化毛细血管PO2值与动脉化毛细血管PO2值无相关性。经皮监测是最可靠和最便宜的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信