Macrophage procoagulants.

R L Edwards, F R Rickles
{"title":"Macrophage procoagulants.","authors":"R L Edwards,&nbsp;F R Rickles","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>From the preceding exposition it is now clear that the regulation of monocyte/macrophage PCA is dependent upon a complex network of interacting pathways, some of which amplify the response of the monocyte/macrophage, while others inhibit. In all probability many more will emerge. The construct illustrated in Figure 3, therefore, is a simplified view of the two major stimulatory pathways: the T cell-dependent pathway, activated by immune recognition and mediated by lymphokine(s); and the T cell-independent pathway, activated by direct perturbation of monocytes by such stimuli as LPS. At least 2 or 3 different PCAs can be expressed by monocyte/macrophages from different species, depending upon the anatomic site of the origin of the cell and the types of stimuli imposed. Inhibition of PCA expression is accomplished by at least one set of regulatory lipoproteins, and other inhibitory loops may be found. The result of these multiple interactions is the deposition of fibrin on the cell surface or in the surrounding milieu. It is our belief that this close relationship between coagulation reactions and inflammatory reactions, resulting in fibrin deposition, represents a fundamental host defense designed to delimit the inflammatory response. Nevertheless, the precise role of monocyte procoagulants in vivo remains unclear. A number of potential mechanisms exist for activation of coagulation in both inflammatory and neoplastic disorders, and the finding of enhanced monocyte procoagulant activity by no means establishes its importance in physiologic or, pathosphysiologic responses in vivo. Further studies, possibly with agents capable of specific inhibition of monocyte procoagulants in vivo, will be necessary to define the precise importance of these procoagulants in clinical disorders.</p>","PeriodicalId":76372,"journal":{"name":"Progress in hemostasis and thrombosis","volume":"7 ","pages":"183-209"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1984-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in hemostasis and thrombosis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

From the preceding exposition it is now clear that the regulation of monocyte/macrophage PCA is dependent upon a complex network of interacting pathways, some of which amplify the response of the monocyte/macrophage, while others inhibit. In all probability many more will emerge. The construct illustrated in Figure 3, therefore, is a simplified view of the two major stimulatory pathways: the T cell-dependent pathway, activated by immune recognition and mediated by lymphokine(s); and the T cell-independent pathway, activated by direct perturbation of monocytes by such stimuli as LPS. At least 2 or 3 different PCAs can be expressed by monocyte/macrophages from different species, depending upon the anatomic site of the origin of the cell and the types of stimuli imposed. Inhibition of PCA expression is accomplished by at least one set of regulatory lipoproteins, and other inhibitory loops may be found. The result of these multiple interactions is the deposition of fibrin on the cell surface or in the surrounding milieu. It is our belief that this close relationship between coagulation reactions and inflammatory reactions, resulting in fibrin deposition, represents a fundamental host defense designed to delimit the inflammatory response. Nevertheless, the precise role of monocyte procoagulants in vivo remains unclear. A number of potential mechanisms exist for activation of coagulation in both inflammatory and neoplastic disorders, and the finding of enhanced monocyte procoagulant activity by no means establishes its importance in physiologic or, pathosphysiologic responses in vivo. Further studies, possibly with agents capable of specific inhibition of monocyte procoagulants in vivo, will be necessary to define the precise importance of these procoagulants in clinical disorders.

巨噬细胞促凝血的。
从前面的阐述可以清楚地看出,单核细胞/巨噬细胞PCA的调节依赖于一个复杂的相互作用通路网络,其中一些通路放大单核细胞/巨噬细胞的反应,而另一些通路则抑制。很可能还会出现更多。因此,图3所示的结构是两种主要刺激途径的简化视图:T细胞依赖性途径,由免疫识别激活并由淋巴因子介导;以及T细胞独立通路,由LPS等刺激对单核细胞的直接扰动激活。来自不同种类的单核细胞/巨噬细胞可以表达至少2或3种不同的pca,这取决于细胞起源的解剖部位和施加的刺激类型。抑制PCA表达是由至少一组调节脂蛋白完成的,并且可能发现其他抑制环。这些多重相互作用的结果是纤维蛋白沉积在细胞表面或周围环境中。我们相信,凝血反应和炎症反应之间的密切关系,导致纤维蛋白沉积,代表了一种基本的宿主防御,旨在划定炎症反应。然而,单核细胞促凝剂在体内的确切作用尚不清楚。在炎症和肿瘤疾病中,凝血激活存在许多潜在的机制,单核细胞促凝活性增强的发现并不能确定其在体内生理或病理生理反应中的重要性。进一步的研究,可能是使用能够在体内特异性抑制单核细胞促凝剂的药物,将有必要确定这些促凝剂在临床疾病中的确切重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信