[Chances, possibilities and effects of new installations, mainly automated protocols in the field of cytology as well as cytologic early cancer diagnosis].

Microscopica acta. Supplement Pub Date : 1983-01-01
W Winkler
{"title":"[Chances, possibilities and effects of new installations, mainly automated protocols in the field of cytology as well as cytologic early cancer diagnosis].","authors":"W Winkler","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the recent past symptoms of a reorganization of laboratory medicine became apparent. They were brought about by methodological progress in analytical biochemistry, chemistry and also by the rapidly increasing efficiency of automation in the clinical laboratory as well as in medical practice. A somewhat parallel change also comes into existence in cytology and also, within certain limits, the histology. Since the early seventies the German Government, in accord with these developments, has supported some projects purporting to design better, more reproducible and more simple procedures in clinical diagnosis. With regard to cytological detection of malignancy this meant the development of methods to render cytological diagnosis a more potent tool for the recognition of cancer at an earlier stage on pre-selected material and with a high degree of sensitivity. Requirements on the quality of these methods with regard to reliability and safety will be discussed together with those marginal conditions which are expected to have a bearing on decisions aiming at the introduction of those methods into cytological routine. Consideration of those problems will be based on qualification requirements on prescreening procedures in general and manual cytological prescreening in particular. Discussion will also be extended on procedural sources of error.</p>","PeriodicalId":76159,"journal":{"name":"Microscopica acta. Supplement","volume":"6 ","pages":"187-207"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1983-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microscopica acta. Supplement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the recent past symptoms of a reorganization of laboratory medicine became apparent. They were brought about by methodological progress in analytical biochemistry, chemistry and also by the rapidly increasing efficiency of automation in the clinical laboratory as well as in medical practice. A somewhat parallel change also comes into existence in cytology and also, within certain limits, the histology. Since the early seventies the German Government, in accord with these developments, has supported some projects purporting to design better, more reproducible and more simple procedures in clinical diagnosis. With regard to cytological detection of malignancy this meant the development of methods to render cytological diagnosis a more potent tool for the recognition of cancer at an earlier stage on pre-selected material and with a high degree of sensitivity. Requirements on the quality of these methods with regard to reliability and safety will be discussed together with those marginal conditions which are expected to have a bearing on decisions aiming at the introduction of those methods into cytological routine. Consideration of those problems will be based on qualification requirements on prescreening procedures in general and manual cytological prescreening in particular. Discussion will also be extended on procedural sources of error.

[机会,可能性和新装置的影响,主要是细胞学领域的自动化协议以及细胞学早期癌症诊断]。
在最近的过去,检验医学重组的症状变得明显。它们是由分析生物化学和化学的方法进步以及临床实验室和医疗实践中自动化效率的迅速提高带来的。类似的变化也出现在细胞学上,在一定范围内,也出现在组织学上。自70年代初以来,根据这些发展,德国政府支持了一些旨在设计更好、更可重复和更简单的临床诊断程序的项目。关于恶性肿瘤的细胞学检测,这意味着发展了使细胞学诊断成为更有效的工具的方法,以便在预先选择的材料上更早地识别癌症,并具有高度的敏感性。对这些方法在可靠性和安全性方面的质量要求将与那些预计会影响将这些方法引入细胞学常规的决定的边缘条件一起讨论。对这些问题的审议将基于一般预筛选程序的资格要求,特别是手工细胞学预筛选。还将就程序上的错误来源展开讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信