Potentiation of odor by taste in rats: tests of some nonassociative factors.

K W Rusiniak, C C Palmerino, J Garcia
{"title":"Potentiation of odor by taste in rats: tests of some nonassociative factors.","authors":"K W Rusiniak,&nbsp;C C Palmerino,&nbsp;J Garcia","doi":"10.1037/h0077915","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The contribution of nonassociative neophobia and sensitization to the potentiation of odor by taste in rats was tested in three experiments. In Experiment 1, neophobia for almond odor (O), saccharin taste (T), and odor-taste compound (OT) cues was tested before and after noncontingent lithium chloride poisoning and compared with conditioned aversions produced by OT-LiCl temporal pairing. The OT compound potentiated unconditioned neophobia, but there was no evidence of poison-enhanced neophobia, disinhibition of neophobia, or sensitization by noncontingent LiCl; temporal pairing produced aversions for the compound and its elements. In Experiment 2, generalization to a novel odor was tested after O-LiCl or compound OT-LiCl pairing. The potentiated odor aversion did not generalize to the novel odor; it was specific to the odor paired with taste and LiCl. In Experiment 3, potentiation of the odor component by a discriminant or nondiscriminant taste component was tested. Potentiation was evident only when a novel discriminant taste was in compound with odor prior to LiCl poisoning. These studies support an associative \"indexing\" hypothesis of the potentiation effect in rats.</p>","PeriodicalId":15394,"journal":{"name":"Journal of comparative and physiological psychology","volume":"96 5","pages":"775-80"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1982-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1037/h0077915","citationCount":"35","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of comparative and physiological psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/h0077915","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 35

Abstract

The contribution of nonassociative neophobia and sensitization to the potentiation of odor by taste in rats was tested in three experiments. In Experiment 1, neophobia for almond odor (O), saccharin taste (T), and odor-taste compound (OT) cues was tested before and after noncontingent lithium chloride poisoning and compared with conditioned aversions produced by OT-LiCl temporal pairing. The OT compound potentiated unconditioned neophobia, but there was no evidence of poison-enhanced neophobia, disinhibition of neophobia, or sensitization by noncontingent LiCl; temporal pairing produced aversions for the compound and its elements. In Experiment 2, generalization to a novel odor was tested after O-LiCl or compound OT-LiCl pairing. The potentiated odor aversion did not generalize to the novel odor; it was specific to the odor paired with taste and LiCl. In Experiment 3, potentiation of the odor component by a discriminant or nondiscriminant taste component was tested. Potentiation was evident only when a novel discriminant taste was in compound with odor prior to LiCl poisoning. These studies support an associative "indexing" hypothesis of the potentiation effect in rats.

大鼠味觉对气味的增强作用:一些非联想因素的测试。
在三个实验中测试了非联想新事物恐惧症和敏感化对大鼠嗅觉增强的贡献。实验1测试了非偶然氯化锂中毒前后对杏仁气味(O)、糖精味道(T)和气味-味觉化合物(OT)线索的新恐惧症,并与OT- licl时间配对产生的条件厌恶进行了比较。OT化合物增强了无条件的新恐惧症,但没有证据表明毒素增强了新恐惧症,新恐惧症的解除抑制,或非偶然的LiCl致敏;时间配对产生对化合物及其元素的厌恶。在实验2中,测试了O-LiCl或复合OT-LiCl配对后对新气味的泛化。增强的气味厌恶并没有推广到新的气味;它对气味、味道和lcl有特异性。在实验3中,我们测试了气味成分被鉴别性或非鉴别性味觉成分增强的情况。只有当一种新的鉴别味道与LiCl中毒前的气味复合时,增强作用才明显。这些研究支持了大鼠增强效应的联想“索引”假说。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信