Nuclear magnetic resonance and transcutaneous electromagnetic blood flow measurement.

J H Battocletti, R E Halbach, S X Salles-Cunha, A Sances
{"title":"Nuclear magnetic resonance and transcutaneous electromagnetic blood flow measurement.","authors":"J H Battocletti,&nbsp;R E Halbach,&nbsp;S X Salles-Cunha,&nbsp;A Sances","doi":"10.1080/16070658.1983.11689327","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Static and alternating magnetic fields are employed in blood flowmeters using nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) principles and electromagnetic induction by a moving conductor (TEM). Both techniques require high steady magnetic fields, obtained either from permanent magnets or from electromagnets. A relatively homogeneous magnetic field is needed for NMR, but, though important for calibration, homogeneity is not critical for TEM. NMR is more complex than TEM since it requires radio-frequency and audio-frequency magnetic fields. However, the TEM method requires surface electrodes in contact with the skin, or needle electrodes placed subcutaneously, whereas NMR is contactless. The NMR flowmeter can be calibrated directly, but appropriate and approximate models must be assumed and then solved by computer to quantify blood flow by the TEM flowmeter. Flow in individual vessels is measured a priori in the TEM flowmeter by virtue of the assumed models. To measure flow in individual vessels by NMR, a scanning or ranging method is required, which logically leads to blood flow imaging. The levels of steady, radio-frequency, and audio-frequency magnetic fields used in the two types of flowmeters are low enough so as not to cause any apparent stimulus to human volunteers and patients tested.</p>","PeriodicalId":76653,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of microwave power","volume":"18 3","pages":"221-32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1983-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/16070658.1983.11689327","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of microwave power","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/16070658.1983.11689327","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Static and alternating magnetic fields are employed in blood flowmeters using nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) principles and electromagnetic induction by a moving conductor (TEM). Both techniques require high steady magnetic fields, obtained either from permanent magnets or from electromagnets. A relatively homogeneous magnetic field is needed for NMR, but, though important for calibration, homogeneity is not critical for TEM. NMR is more complex than TEM since it requires radio-frequency and audio-frequency magnetic fields. However, the TEM method requires surface electrodes in contact with the skin, or needle electrodes placed subcutaneously, whereas NMR is contactless. The NMR flowmeter can be calibrated directly, but appropriate and approximate models must be assumed and then solved by computer to quantify blood flow by the TEM flowmeter. Flow in individual vessels is measured a priori in the TEM flowmeter by virtue of the assumed models. To measure flow in individual vessels by NMR, a scanning or ranging method is required, which logically leads to blood flow imaging. The levels of steady, radio-frequency, and audio-frequency magnetic fields used in the two types of flowmeters are low enough so as not to cause any apparent stimulus to human volunteers and patients tested.

核磁共振和经皮电磁血流量测量。
利用核磁共振(NMR)原理和移动导体(TEM)的电磁感应,将静磁场和交变磁场应用于血液流量计中。这两种技术都需要从永磁体或电磁铁中获得高稳定磁场。核磁共振需要一个相对均匀的磁场,但是,尽管对校准很重要,均匀性对透射电镜来说并不重要。核磁共振比瞬变电磁法更复杂,因为它需要射频和音频磁场。然而,TEM方法需要与皮肤接触的表面电极,或皮下放置的针电极,而NMR是无接触的。核磁共振流量计可以直接标定,但要用透射电镜流量计定量血流量,必须先假定合适的近似模型,然后由计算机进行求解。通过假设的模型,在TEM流量计中先验地测量了单个血管中的流量。为了通过核磁共振测量单个血管的流量,需要一种扫描或测距方法,这在逻辑上导致血流成像。这两种流量计中使用的稳定、射频和音频磁场水平足够低,不会对接受测试的人类志愿者和患者造成任何明显的刺激。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信