Age-specific doses of lormetazepam as a night sedative in cases of chronic sleep disturbance.

Waking and sleeping Pub Date : 1980-07-01
U J Jovanović, H Ott, H Heidrich, K Stephan, M Schratzer
{"title":"Age-specific doses of lormetazepam as a night sedative in cases of chronic sleep disturbance.","authors":"U J Jovanović,&nbsp;H Ott,&nbsp;H Heidrich,&nbsp;K Stephan,&nbsp;M Schratzer","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Lormetazepam, a new benzodiazepine derivative, was tested under double blind conditions in order to find the optimal dosage for different age groups of out-patients. 120 patients suffering from chronic sleep disturbance were included in the study: a younger group (age 20 to 55) and an older group (age 56 to 85 years). Four different doses were given to each age group: 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, and 3.0 mg to the younger group and 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0 mg to the older group. A pre-placebo week (i.e. when all patients received placebo) in which baseline data were recorded preceded the two verum weeks, and these were followed by a post-placebo or withdrawal week (again all patients receiving placebo). The level of significance accepted for statistical decisions was alpha = 0.05. No differences in effects between the different doses were observed with regard to sleep pattern variables (sleep latency, sleep duration, frequency of awakenings, sleep quality, occurrence of 'bad' dreams) with the exception of sleep quality which was better in the older group than in the younger group after 0.5 mg in week 2. Considerable differences with regard to hangover feelings the next morning and during the next day (morning feelings, tranquility, alertness, and concentration), comparison of the effects of discontinuing therapy upon the above-mentioned sleep pattern variables and small differences in side effects--which were few--led to the following conclusion: --0.5 mg stood out as the best dose for the older group. --None of the dosages given to the younger group emerged clearly as superior. However, it would seem that the 1 mg dose should be the dose recommended, since fewer unfavourable scores and side effects appeared after this dose.</p>","PeriodicalId":76817,"journal":{"name":"Waking and sleeping","volume":"4 3","pages":"223-35"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1980-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Waking and sleeping","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Lormetazepam, a new benzodiazepine derivative, was tested under double blind conditions in order to find the optimal dosage for different age groups of out-patients. 120 patients suffering from chronic sleep disturbance were included in the study: a younger group (age 20 to 55) and an older group (age 56 to 85 years). Four different doses were given to each age group: 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, and 3.0 mg to the younger group and 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0 mg to the older group. A pre-placebo week (i.e. when all patients received placebo) in which baseline data were recorded preceded the two verum weeks, and these were followed by a post-placebo or withdrawal week (again all patients receiving placebo). The level of significance accepted for statistical decisions was alpha = 0.05. No differences in effects between the different doses were observed with regard to sleep pattern variables (sleep latency, sleep duration, frequency of awakenings, sleep quality, occurrence of 'bad' dreams) with the exception of sleep quality which was better in the older group than in the younger group after 0.5 mg in week 2. Considerable differences with regard to hangover feelings the next morning and during the next day (morning feelings, tranquility, alertness, and concentration), comparison of the effects of discontinuing therapy upon the above-mentioned sleep pattern variables and small differences in side effects--which were few--led to the following conclusion: --0.5 mg stood out as the best dose for the older group. --None of the dosages given to the younger group emerged clearly as superior. However, it would seem that the 1 mg dose should be the dose recommended, since fewer unfavourable scores and side effects appeared after this dose.

慢性睡眠障碍病例中特定年龄剂量的氯甲西泮作为夜间镇静剂。
采用双盲法对新型苯二氮卓类药物衍生物洛美他西泮进行了临床试验,以确定不同年龄段门诊患者的最佳用药剂量。120名患有慢性睡眠障碍的患者被纳入研究:一组较年轻(20至55岁),另一组较年长(56至85岁)。每个年龄组给予四种不同的剂量:年轻人给予0.5、1.0、2.0和3.0毫克,老年人给予0.5、1.0、1.5和2.0毫克。安慰剂前一周(即所有患者接受安慰剂),在这两周之前记录基线数据,然后是安慰剂后或停药周(再次所有患者接受安慰剂)。统计学决定的显著性水平为alpha = 0.05。在睡眠模式变量(睡眠潜伏期、睡眠持续时间、醒来频率、睡眠质量、“坏”梦的发生)方面,不同剂量之间的效果没有差异,只有在第2周服用0.5毫克后,老年人的睡眠质量好于年轻人。第二天早上和第二天的宿醉感觉(早晨的感觉、宁静、警觉和注意力集中)有相当大的差异,对上述睡眠模式变量停止治疗的影响和副作用的微小差异(很少)进行比较,得出以下结论:0.5毫克是老年人的最佳剂量。给年轻人的剂量都没有明显的优势。然而,似乎1mg的剂量应该是推荐剂量,因为在此剂量后出现的不良评分和副作用较少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信