Effects of intrinsic sympathetic activity of beta-blockers on SA and AV nodes in man.

European journal of cardiology Pub Date : 1981-01-01
J F Leclercq, M D Rosengarten, S Kural, P Attuel, P Coumel
{"title":"Effects of intrinsic sympathetic activity of beta-blockers on SA and AV nodes in man.","authors":"J F Leclercq,&nbsp;M D Rosengarten,&nbsp;S Kural,&nbsp;P Attuel,&nbsp;P Coumel","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The authors compare the effects of beta-blockers without intrinsic sympathetic activity (ISA) (propranolol, 160 mg/day), moderate ISA (acebutolol, 800 mg/day) and high ISA (pindolol, 20 mg/day). The sinus rate decreases more with propranolol than with acebutolol, during the day (P less than 0.01) and during the night (P less than 0.001), whereas pindolol does not change the daylight rate and increases the nighttime rate (P less than 0.001). The ventricular rate during atrial fibrillation (AV nodal transmission) is modified as is sinus rate. There is no significant difference between propranolol and acebutolol, and a highly significant difference between pindolol and propranolol (P less than 0.001) or acebutolol (P less than 0.01). Moreover, the eurythmic effect of beta-blockers, making RR intervals more regular, is maximal with propranolol and minimal with pindolol, as judged on RR interval histograms. The ISA of the beta-blockers is of major importance for the clinical use of these drugs, and in the case of SA or AV node dysfunction ISA can be useful, but it can obscure the beneficial effects of beta-blocking therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":72971,"journal":{"name":"European journal of cardiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1981-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The authors compare the effects of beta-blockers without intrinsic sympathetic activity (ISA) (propranolol, 160 mg/day), moderate ISA (acebutolol, 800 mg/day) and high ISA (pindolol, 20 mg/day). The sinus rate decreases more with propranolol than with acebutolol, during the day (P less than 0.01) and during the night (P less than 0.001), whereas pindolol does not change the daylight rate and increases the nighttime rate (P less than 0.001). The ventricular rate during atrial fibrillation (AV nodal transmission) is modified as is sinus rate. There is no significant difference between propranolol and acebutolol, and a highly significant difference between pindolol and propranolol (P less than 0.001) or acebutolol (P less than 0.01). Moreover, the eurythmic effect of beta-blockers, making RR intervals more regular, is maximal with propranolol and minimal with pindolol, as judged on RR interval histograms. The ISA of the beta-blockers is of major importance for the clinical use of these drugs, and in the case of SA or AV node dysfunction ISA can be useful, but it can obscure the beneficial effects of beta-blocking therapy.

受体阻滞剂内在交感神经活性对人SA和AV淋巴结的影响。
作者比较了无内源性交感神经活动(ISA)的β受体阻滞剂(心得安,160毫克/天)、中等ISA(乙酰丁胺醇,800毫克/天)和高ISA(品多洛尔,20毫克/天)的效果。在白天(P < 0.01)和夜间(P < 0.001),心得安组窦率下降幅度大于乙酰丁胺醇组,而品多洛尔组窦率升高(P < 0.001),但对白天窦率无明显影响。房颤(房室结传递)期间的心室率和窦率一样被改变。心得安与乙酰布洛尔无显著差异,品多洛尔与心得安(P < 0.001)、乙酰布洛尔(P < 0.01)差异极显著。此外,从RR间期直方图判断,受体阻滞剂的心律调节作用,使RR间期更有规律,在心得安组最大,在品多洛尔组最小。受体阻滞剂的ISA对这些药物的临床应用具有重要意义,在SA或房室结功能障碍的情况下,ISA可能是有用的,但它可能会掩盖β阻断治疗的有益效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信