Kaishuo Yang , Paul R.J. Conolly , Libin Liu , Xiaoxian Yang , Neil Robinson , Ming Li , Mohamed Mahmoud , Ammar El-Husseiny , Michael Verrall , Eric F. May , Michael L. Johns
{"title":"Quantitative characterization of methane adsorption in shale using low-field NMR","authors":"Kaishuo Yang , Paul R.J. Conolly , Libin Liu , Xiaoxian Yang , Neil Robinson , Ming Li , Mohamed Mahmoud , Ammar El-Husseiny , Michael Verrall , Eric F. May , Michael L. Johns","doi":"10.1016/j.jngse.2022.104847","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span><span>Quantification of methane content in shales is a critical parameter for estimation of their potential gas production capacity. Traditional gravimetric methods for estimation of this quantity are sensitive only to adsorbed methane and are difficult to apply either to intact shale rock cores or via field measurements. Here non-invasive low-field nuclear magnetic resonance (LF-NMR) is applied to quantify excess methane </span>adsorption capacity in two intact shale rock plugs at pressures up to 150 bar; validation is provided against destructive gravimetric methods performed on fragments from the same shale rock plugs. The resultant NMR </span>transverse relaxation time (</span><em>T</em><sub>2</sub>) distributions contain three distinct peaks (referred to as peaks P1 – P3) which are allocated to adsorbed methane in organic pores, methane constrained to inorganic pores and bulk methane located predominately in fractures, respectively. The area of peak P1 is observed to increase with pressure up to 100 bar, after which it reaches a plateau, whilst the area of peaks P2 and P3 both increase linearly with pressure up to 150 bar. The most accurate estimate of excess methane adsorption capacity is obtained via a combination of an overall system mass balance and the methane located in inorganic pores and fractures (peaks P2 and P3, respectively), where excellent agreement is produced with corresponding gravimetric measurements for both shale samples studied.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":372,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering","volume":"108 ","pages":"Article 104847"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1875510022004334","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
Quantification of methane content in shales is a critical parameter for estimation of their potential gas production capacity. Traditional gravimetric methods for estimation of this quantity are sensitive only to adsorbed methane and are difficult to apply either to intact shale rock cores or via field measurements. Here non-invasive low-field nuclear magnetic resonance (LF-NMR) is applied to quantify excess methane adsorption capacity in two intact shale rock plugs at pressures up to 150 bar; validation is provided against destructive gravimetric methods performed on fragments from the same shale rock plugs. The resultant NMR transverse relaxation time (T2) distributions contain three distinct peaks (referred to as peaks P1 – P3) which are allocated to adsorbed methane in organic pores, methane constrained to inorganic pores and bulk methane located predominately in fractures, respectively. The area of peak P1 is observed to increase with pressure up to 100 bar, after which it reaches a plateau, whilst the area of peaks P2 and P3 both increase linearly with pressure up to 150 bar. The most accurate estimate of excess methane adsorption capacity is obtained via a combination of an overall system mass balance and the methane located in inorganic pores and fractures (peaks P2 and P3, respectively), where excellent agreement is produced with corresponding gravimetric measurements for both shale samples studied.
期刊介绍:
The objective of the Journal of Natural Gas Science & Engineering is to bridge the gap between the engineering and the science of natural gas by publishing explicitly written articles intelligible to scientists and engineers working in any field of natural gas science and engineering from the reservoir to the market.
An attempt is made in all issues to balance the subject matter and to appeal to a broad readership. The Journal of Natural Gas Science & Engineering covers the fields of natural gas exploration, production, processing and transmission in its broadest possible sense. Topics include: origin and accumulation of natural gas; natural gas geochemistry; gas-reservoir engineering; well logging, testing and evaluation; mathematical modelling; enhanced gas recovery; thermodynamics and phase behaviour, gas-reservoir modelling and simulation; natural gas production engineering; primary and enhanced production from unconventional gas resources, subsurface issues related to coalbed methane, tight gas, shale gas, and hydrate production, formation evaluation; exploration methods, multiphase flow and flow assurance issues, novel processing (e.g., subsea) techniques, raw gas transmission methods, gas processing/LNG technologies, sales gas transmission and storage. The Journal of Natural Gas Science & Engineering will also focus on economical, environmental, management and safety issues related to natural gas production, processing and transportation.