{"title":"A further investigation of sexually symbolic concepts using the semantic differential technique.","authors":"G S Archer, I S Burgess","doi":"10.1080/0091651X.1970.10380268","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary Fifty students responded to a semantic differential questionnaire designed to test the meaning of sexually symbolic concepts. Two measures were used: first, the mean potency score, and, second, the mean score on the masculine-feminine (M - F) subscale. It was found that a number of discrepancies occurred between (a) mean potency and mean M - F scores; (b) mean potency score and predictions based on psychoanalytic theory; and (c) mean M - F scores and predictions based on psychoanalytic theory. The results were interpreted within a learning theory framework in accord with Staats' (1968) theoretical formulation.","PeriodicalId":78361,"journal":{"name":"Journal of projective techniques & personality assessment","volume":"34 5","pages":"369-72"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1970-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/0091651X.1970.10380268","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of projective techniques & personality assessment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0091651X.1970.10380268","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
Summary Fifty students responded to a semantic differential questionnaire designed to test the meaning of sexually symbolic concepts. Two measures were used: first, the mean potency score, and, second, the mean score on the masculine-feminine (M - F) subscale. It was found that a number of discrepancies occurred between (a) mean potency and mean M - F scores; (b) mean potency score and predictions based on psychoanalytic theory; and (c) mean M - F scores and predictions based on psychoanalytic theory. The results were interpreted within a learning theory framework in accord with Staats' (1968) theoretical formulation.