A Semantic Differential investigation of sexually symbolic concepts: Freud and Jung.

R H Althouse
{"title":"A Semantic Differential investigation of sexually symbolic concepts: Freud and Jung.","authors":"R H Althouse","doi":"10.1080/0091651X.1970.10380296","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary Masculine and feminine ratings, via the Semantic Differential, of various nouns hypothesized by Freud or Jung to represent masculine or feminine symbolism, were made by 67 males and 78 female college students. 68 Ss (34 males and 34 females) received Freudian nouns; 77 Ss (33 males and 44 females) received Jungian nouns. While certain nouns were rated according to psychoanalytic theory, others were not. Some masculine concepts (“nail file,” “balloon,” “noodle,” “bird”) were rated feminine, and some fiminine concepts (”tunnel,” “trap door,” “box,” “case,” “garage,” “club,” “city,” “hill,” “cask,” “earth,” “whale,” “board,” “net”) were rated masculine. These results suggested caution in accepting psychoanalytic criteria for sexual symbolism in the analysis of clinical material.","PeriodicalId":78361,"journal":{"name":"Journal of projective techniques & personality assessment","volume":"34 6","pages":"507-12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1970-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/0091651X.1970.10380296","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of projective techniques & personality assessment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0091651X.1970.10380296","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Summary Masculine and feminine ratings, via the Semantic Differential, of various nouns hypothesized by Freud or Jung to represent masculine or feminine symbolism, were made by 67 males and 78 female college students. 68 Ss (34 males and 34 females) received Freudian nouns; 77 Ss (33 males and 44 females) received Jungian nouns. While certain nouns were rated according to psychoanalytic theory, others were not. Some masculine concepts (“nail file,” “balloon,” “noodle,” “bird”) were rated feminine, and some fiminine concepts (”tunnel,” “trap door,” “box,” “case,” “garage,” “club,” “city,” “hill,” “cask,” “earth,” “whale,” “board,” “net”) were rated masculine. These results suggested caution in accepting psychoanalytic criteria for sexual symbolism in the analysis of clinical material.
性象征概念的语义差异研究:弗洛伊德与荣格。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信