{"title":"Submaximal endurance performance related to the ventilation thresholds.","authors":"T M McLellan, J S Skinner","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study was undertaken to compare the variance in time to fatigue (TF) at intensities expressed relative to VO2max, ventilation threshold 1 (VT1) or 2 (VT2). Two 3-min, 30 Watt incremental tests on the cycle ergometer were used to determine VO2max (50.7 +/- 7.2 ml X kg-1 X min-1), VT1 (51.7 +/- 3.7% VO2max) and VT2 (79.0 +/- 3.7% VO2max) for 16 subjects. At weekly intervals, subjects worked to volitional fatigue at 3 randomly-ordered power outputs that represented 73.1 +/- 2.8, 85.4 +/- 2.8 and 95.0 +/- 3.4% VO2max. A significant quadratic interaction was observed for TF values between VO2max and intensity, suggesting a different magnitude of response related to VO2max. Subject data were then grouped according to VO2max into a low (N = 5, 40-44 ml X kg-1 X min-1), medium (N = 5, 48-52 ml X kg-1 X min-1) or high (N = 6, 56-61 ml X kg-1 X min-1) category. For all groups, a decaying exponential function best described the relationship between TF and intensity. The method of expressing intensity appeared to have only a small effect on the proportion of variance explained by this logarithmic relationship (0.85 less than or equal to r2 less than or equal to 0.93). In contrast, however, a 30% reduction in the standard error of estimate for TF was observed when intensity was expressed relative to both ventilation thresholds as compared to the traditional expression of intensity relative to VO2max.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)</p>","PeriodicalId":75669,"journal":{"name":"Canadian journal of applied sport sciences. Journal canadien des sciences appliquees au sport","volume":"10 2","pages":"81-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1985-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian journal of applied sport sciences. Journal canadien des sciences appliquees au sport","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study was undertaken to compare the variance in time to fatigue (TF) at intensities expressed relative to VO2max, ventilation threshold 1 (VT1) or 2 (VT2). Two 3-min, 30 Watt incremental tests on the cycle ergometer were used to determine VO2max (50.7 +/- 7.2 ml X kg-1 X min-1), VT1 (51.7 +/- 3.7% VO2max) and VT2 (79.0 +/- 3.7% VO2max) for 16 subjects. At weekly intervals, subjects worked to volitional fatigue at 3 randomly-ordered power outputs that represented 73.1 +/- 2.8, 85.4 +/- 2.8 and 95.0 +/- 3.4% VO2max. A significant quadratic interaction was observed for TF values between VO2max and intensity, suggesting a different magnitude of response related to VO2max. Subject data were then grouped according to VO2max into a low (N = 5, 40-44 ml X kg-1 X min-1), medium (N = 5, 48-52 ml X kg-1 X min-1) or high (N = 6, 56-61 ml X kg-1 X min-1) category. For all groups, a decaying exponential function best described the relationship between TF and intensity. The method of expressing intensity appeared to have only a small effect on the proportion of variance explained by this logarithmic relationship (0.85 less than or equal to r2 less than or equal to 0.93). In contrast, however, a 30% reduction in the standard error of estimate for TF was observed when intensity was expressed relative to both ventilation thresholds as compared to the traditional expression of intensity relative to VO2max.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
本研究旨在比较相对于VO2max、通气阈值1 (VT1)或2 (VT2)的强度下疲劳时间(TF)的方差。在循环测力仪上进行2次3分钟、30瓦特的增量试验,测定16例受试者的VO2max (50.7 +/- 7.2 ml X kg-1 X min-1)、VT1 (51.7 +/- 3.7% VO2max)和VT2 (79.0 +/- 3.7% VO2max)。每隔一周,受试者在代表73.1 +/- 2.8、85.4 +/- 2.8和95.0 +/- 3.4% VO2max的3种随机顺序功率输出下工作至意志疲劳。最大摄氧量和强度之间的TF值存在显著的二次交互作用,表明与最大摄氧量相关的响应幅度不同。然后根据VO2max将受试者数据分为低(N = 5,40 -44 ml X kg-1 X min-1)、中(N = 5,48 -52 ml X kg-1 X min-1)和高(N = 6,56 -61 ml X kg-1 X min-1)组。对于所有组,衰减指数函数最好地描述了TF与强度之间的关系。表达强度的方法似乎对这种对数关系解释的方差比例只有很小的影响(0.85小于等于r2小于等于0.93)。然而,与传统的相对于VO2max的强度表达相比,当强度相对于两个通风阈值表示时,观察到TF估计的标准误差降低了30%。(摘要删节250字)