The role of zinc in Candida dimorphism.

D R Soll
{"title":"The role of zinc in Candida dimorphism.","authors":"D R Soll","doi":"10.1007/978-1-4613-9547-8_10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>By analyzing the effects of zinc on growth and dimorphism, it has become clear that there exists at least two modes, or \"pathways,\" of mycelium formation in C. albicans (7). Paradoxically, even though the characteristics for the two modes appear to be opposite in nature, the mycelium that form appear to be superficially similar. Unfortunately, it may be difficult to compare the two modes unambiguously at the molecular level for two reasons. First, the physiology of cells resuming growth after release from stationary phase will undoubtedly differ drastically from the physiology of cells exiting from the growth cycle, regardless of phenotype. Therefore, most molecular or physiologic differences probably will represent differences in growth rate or position in the cell cycle, rather than alternate molecular mechanisms that are basic to the alternate modes of mycelium formation. Second, it has been observed that during release from stationary phase, a prescribed program of gene expression accompanies commitment to the mycelial and budding forms (11). This program was demonstrable because of the excellent synchrony and homogeneity of released cultures (60), which is a characteristic lacking in cultures entering stationary phase in the M10 mode. Even so, a comparison at the molecular level between the two modes of mycelium formation should be undertaken with the above reservations in mind. Perhaps the most attractive aspect of alternate modes of mycelium formation in Candida is at the genetic level of analysis. The hypothesis of homozygosis in the expression of the M10 phenotype is testable, as is the possible role of the M10 phenotype in tissue penetration. If the hypothesis is true and if the M10 phenotype predominates in infected tissue, it would represent a new mechanism of opportunism in infectious fungi that may be used by other systems as well as Candida. If it is not true, a detailed analysis of the differences between the two modes of mycelium formation will still be valuable in our understanding of both the mechanisms regulating phenotypic transitions in Candida and the more general question of cell divergence in developing systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":77092,"journal":{"name":"Current topics in medical mycology","volume":"1 ","pages":"258-85"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1985-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"35","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current topics in medical mycology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-9547-8_10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 35

Abstract

By analyzing the effects of zinc on growth and dimorphism, it has become clear that there exists at least two modes, or "pathways," of mycelium formation in C. albicans (7). Paradoxically, even though the characteristics for the two modes appear to be opposite in nature, the mycelium that form appear to be superficially similar. Unfortunately, it may be difficult to compare the two modes unambiguously at the molecular level for two reasons. First, the physiology of cells resuming growth after release from stationary phase will undoubtedly differ drastically from the physiology of cells exiting from the growth cycle, regardless of phenotype. Therefore, most molecular or physiologic differences probably will represent differences in growth rate or position in the cell cycle, rather than alternate molecular mechanisms that are basic to the alternate modes of mycelium formation. Second, it has been observed that during release from stationary phase, a prescribed program of gene expression accompanies commitment to the mycelial and budding forms (11). This program was demonstrable because of the excellent synchrony and homogeneity of released cultures (60), which is a characteristic lacking in cultures entering stationary phase in the M10 mode. Even so, a comparison at the molecular level between the two modes of mycelium formation should be undertaken with the above reservations in mind. Perhaps the most attractive aspect of alternate modes of mycelium formation in Candida is at the genetic level of analysis. The hypothesis of homozygosis in the expression of the M10 phenotype is testable, as is the possible role of the M10 phenotype in tissue penetration. If the hypothesis is true and if the M10 phenotype predominates in infected tissue, it would represent a new mechanism of opportunism in infectious fungi that may be used by other systems as well as Candida. If it is not true, a detailed analysis of the differences between the two modes of mycelium formation will still be valuable in our understanding of both the mechanisms regulating phenotypic transitions in Candida and the more general question of cell divergence in developing systems.

锌在念珠菌二态性中的作用。
通过分析锌对生长和二态性的影响,我们已经清楚地发现,白色念珠菌中至少存在两种菌丝形成模式或“途径”(7)。矛盾的是,尽管这两种模式的特征在本质上似乎是相反的,但形成的菌丝表面上似乎是相似的。不幸的是,由于两个原因,很难在分子水平上明确地比较这两种模式。首先,无论表型如何,细胞从固定期释放后恢复生长的生理无疑与细胞退出生长周期的生理有很大的不同。因此,大多数分子或生理差异可能代表生长速度或细胞周期中位置的差异,而不是代表菌丝形成不同模式的基本分子机制的不同。其次,在从固定阶段释放的过程中,一个规定的基因表达程序伴随着对菌丝和出芽形式的承诺(11)。这个程序是可证明的,因为释放的培养物具有良好的同步性和同质性(60),这是在M10模式下进入固定阶段的培养物所缺乏的特性。即便如此,在分子水平上比较两种菌丝体形成模式时,也应考虑到上述保留意见。也许念珠菌菌丝形成的交替模式最吸引人的方面是在遗传水平上的分析。M10表型表达的纯合子假说是可检验的,M10表型在组织渗透中的可能作用也是可检验的。如果这一假设是正确的,并且M10表型在感染组织中占主导地位,那么它将代表感染性真菌中的一种新的机会主义机制,这种机制可能被其他系统以及念珠菌所利用。如果这不是真的,详细分析两种菌丝形成模式之间的差异,对于我们理解念珠菌表型转变的调节机制和发育系统中更普遍的细胞分化问题,仍然是有价值的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信