Conversion from cyclosporine to prednisolone and azathioprine. Safe or unsafe?

D Adu, J Michael, T Vlassis, P McMaster
{"title":"Conversion from cyclosporine to prednisolone and azathioprine. Safe or unsafe?","authors":"D Adu,&nbsp;J Michael,&nbsp;T Vlassis,&nbsp;P McMaster","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Out of 58 consecutive cadaveric renal allograft recipients whose initial immunosuppression was cyclosporine (Cys) and prednisolone, 18 were converted to prednisolone and azathioprine. Of these all four patients converted because of rejection lost their grafts. Renal function improved in seven patients converted because of nephrotoxicity and in six out of seven patients converted for miscellaneous reasons. Out of five patients converted electively at three months, one died of infection and three developed acute rejection episodes.</p>","PeriodicalId":77886,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association. European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association. Congress","volume":"21 ","pages":"998-1001"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1985-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association. European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association. Congress","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Out of 58 consecutive cadaveric renal allograft recipients whose initial immunosuppression was cyclosporine (Cys) and prednisolone, 18 were converted to prednisolone and azathioprine. Of these all four patients converted because of rejection lost their grafts. Renal function improved in seven patients converted because of nephrotoxicity and in six out of seven patients converted for miscellaneous reasons. Out of five patients converted electively at three months, one died of infection and three developed acute rejection episodes.

环孢素转化为强的松龙和硫唑嘌呤。安全还是不安全?
在58例初始免疫抑制为环孢素(Cys)和强的松龙的连续尸体肾移植受者中,18例转为强的松龙和硫唑嘌呤。在这四名患者中,由于排斥反应而移植的移植物全部丢失。7例因肾毒性转诊的患者肾功能改善,7例因其他原因转诊的患者中有6例肾功能改善。在5名患者中,有1名患者在3个月时选择性转换,其中1人死于感染,3人出现急性排斥反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信