Biopsychosocial Perioperative Care, Perioperative Stress, and Peripheral T-Cell Subset Recovery After Laparoscopic Hepatectomy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Retrospective Propensity-Weighted Cohort Study.

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Journal of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Pub Date : 2026-10-30 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.2147/JHC.S649665
Huan Ma, Meijie Wang, Linna Wang, Hongxia Song
{"title":"Biopsychosocial Perioperative Care, Perioperative Stress, and Peripheral T-Cell Subset Recovery After Laparoscopic Hepatectomy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Retrospective Propensity-Weighted Cohort Study.","authors":"Huan Ma, Meijie Wang, Linna Wang, Hongxia Song","doi":"10.2147/JHC.S649665","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Laparoscopic hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) imposes substantial surgical and psychological stress, with potential neuroendocrine and immune consequences. Whether integrated biopsychosocial perioperative care is associated with differences across several perioperative domains remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the association of a structured biopsychosocial (BPS) perioperative programme with psychological distress, stress hormones, cellular immunity, postoperative recovery, sleep, safety, and 18-month oncological outcomes after laparoscopic hepatectomy for HCC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-centre retrospective cohort included 343 consecutive patients treated between January 2022 and January 2025; 169 received BPS care plus conventional management and 174 received conventional care alone. Anxiety, depression, stress hormones, T-lymphocyte subsets, recovery, pain, opioid use, sleep, complications, recurrence, and survival were assessed longitudinally. Linear mixed-effects models and propensity-score overlap weighting with multivariable adjustment were used; time-to-event outcomes were analysed using Cox models. The anxiety (Self-Rating Anxiety Scale, SAS) and depression (Self-Rating Depression Scale, SDS) trajectories were prespecified as the co-primary outcomes. Propensity-score overlap weighting used covariates measured before programme allocation, and multiplicity was controlled within prespecified outcome families using the Benjamini-Hochberg false-discovery-rate procedure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After weighting, all measured covariates were balanced (maximum standardised mean difference 0.03). SAS and SDS trajectories favoured BPS care (group × time, both P<0.001), with adjusted discharge differences of -4.3 and -2.7 points, respectively. At postoperative day 7, the adjusted CD4+/CD8+ difference was +0.26 (95% CI 0.20-0.32). Length of stay was shorter by 1.1 days (95% CI -1.6 to -0.7), and 1-month PSQI was lower by 1.45 points (95% CI -1.78 to -1.12). Thirty-day complications, recurrence, and mortality were not statistically different. Peripheral-blood T-cell subset proportions index circulating composition and may not represent tissue or tumour-microenvironment antitumour immunity. After false-discovery-rate correction, all co-primary and secondary endpoints remained significant, whereas the safety and 18-month oncological endpoints did not.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Structured BPS perioperative care was associated with favourable differences across several domains of postoperative recovery after laparoscopic hepatectomy for HCC. These findings support prospective multicentre randomised evaluation of integrated biopsychosocial care. The findings support integrated biopsychosocial care as a complement to, not a replacement for, established enhanced-recovery pathways.</p>","PeriodicalId":15906,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hepatocellular Carcinoma","volume":"13 ","pages":"649665"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13730071/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hepatocellular Carcinoma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JHC.S649665","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Laparoscopic hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) imposes substantial surgical and psychological stress, with potential neuroendocrine and immune consequences. Whether integrated biopsychosocial perioperative care is associated with differences across several perioperative domains remains unclear.

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the association of a structured biopsychosocial (BPS) perioperative programme with psychological distress, stress hormones, cellular immunity, postoperative recovery, sleep, safety, and 18-month oncological outcomes after laparoscopic hepatectomy for HCC.

Methods: This single-centre retrospective cohort included 343 consecutive patients treated between January 2022 and January 2025; 169 received BPS care plus conventional management and 174 received conventional care alone. Anxiety, depression, stress hormones, T-lymphocyte subsets, recovery, pain, opioid use, sleep, complications, recurrence, and survival were assessed longitudinally. Linear mixed-effects models and propensity-score overlap weighting with multivariable adjustment were used; time-to-event outcomes were analysed using Cox models. The anxiety (Self-Rating Anxiety Scale, SAS) and depression (Self-Rating Depression Scale, SDS) trajectories were prespecified as the co-primary outcomes. Propensity-score overlap weighting used covariates measured before programme allocation, and multiplicity was controlled within prespecified outcome families using the Benjamini-Hochberg false-discovery-rate procedure.

Results: After weighting, all measured covariates were balanced (maximum standardised mean difference 0.03). SAS and SDS trajectories favoured BPS care (group × time, both P<0.001), with adjusted discharge differences of -4.3 and -2.7 points, respectively. At postoperative day 7, the adjusted CD4+/CD8+ difference was +0.26 (95% CI 0.20-0.32). Length of stay was shorter by 1.1 days (95% CI -1.6 to -0.7), and 1-month PSQI was lower by 1.45 points (95% CI -1.78 to -1.12). Thirty-day complications, recurrence, and mortality were not statistically different. Peripheral-blood T-cell subset proportions index circulating composition and may not represent tissue or tumour-microenvironment antitumour immunity. After false-discovery-rate correction, all co-primary and secondary endpoints remained significant, whereas the safety and 18-month oncological endpoints did not.

Conclusion: Structured BPS perioperative care was associated with favourable differences across several domains of postoperative recovery after laparoscopic hepatectomy for HCC. These findings support prospective multicentre randomised evaluation of integrated biopsychosocial care. The findings support integrated biopsychosocial care as a complement to, not a replacement for, established enhanced-recovery pathways.

肝细胞癌腹腔镜肝切除术后围手术期护理、围手术期应激和外周血t细胞亚群恢复:一项回顾性倾向加权队列研究
背景:腹腔镜肝切除术治疗肝细胞癌(HCC)会带来巨大的手术和心理压力,并具有潜在的神经内分泌和免疫后果。围手术期综合生物心理社会护理是否与围手术期几个领域的差异有关尚不清楚。目的:本研究旨在评估结构化生物心理社会(BPS)围手术期方案与腹腔镜肝切除术后心理困扰、应激激素、细胞免疫、术后恢复、睡眠、安全性和18个月肿瘤预后的关系。方法:该单中心回顾性队列包括343例在2022年1月至2025年1月期间连续接受治疗的患者;169人接受BPS治疗加常规治疗,174人单独接受常规治疗。纵向评估焦虑、抑郁、应激激素、t淋巴细胞亚群、恢复、疼痛、阿片类药物使用、睡眠、并发症、复发和生存。采用线性混合效应模型和多变量调整的倾向得分重叠加权;使用Cox模型分析时间到事件的结果。焦虑(自评焦虑量表,SAS)和抑郁(自评抑郁量表,SDS)轨迹被预先指定为共同主要结局。倾向得分重叠加权使用在项目分配之前测量的协变量,并且使用Benjamini-Hochberg错误发现率程序在预先指定的结果族中控制多重性。结果:加权后,所有测量的协变量均达到平衡(最大标准化平均差为0.03)。SAS和SDS轨迹有利于BPS护理(组×时间)。结论:结构化的BPS围手术期护理与HCC腹腔镜肝切除术后几个领域的术后恢复有良好的差异。这些发现支持对综合生物-心理-社会护理进行前瞻性多中心随机评价。研究结果支持将生物心理社会综合护理作为既定的增强康复途径的补充,而不是替代。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
2.40%
发文量
108
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书