Antithrombotic Therapy After Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion

JAMA Pub Date : 2026-11-02 DOI:10.1001/jama.2026.21361
Vivek Y. Reddy, Walid I. Saliba, Thomas Waggoner, Devi G. Nair, Stanislav Weiner, Rudolph Evonich, Michael Hoskins, Andrew Dublin, Michael Rinaldi, Gaurang Gandhi, Jonathan W. Dukes, Madhu Reddy, David DeLurgio, Venkat R. Iyer, Ganesh Venkataraman, Ashish Sadhu, Vamsee Yaganti, Kevin Trulock, Douglas N. Gibson, Mohamad Alkhouli, Manish Shah, Shephal K. Doshi, Andrea Natale, Megan Coylewright, C. Michael Gibson, Ahmed A. Kolkailah, Wael A. Jaber, Krystal Leger, Elizabeth Matznick, Thomas Christen, Brad S. Sutton, Kenneth M. Stein, Saibal Kar
{"title":"Antithrombotic Therapy After Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion","authors":"Vivek Y. Reddy, Walid I. Saliba, Thomas Waggoner, Devi G. Nair, Stanislav Weiner, Rudolph Evonich, Michael Hoskins, Andrew Dublin, Michael Rinaldi, Gaurang Gandhi, Jonathan W. Dukes, Madhu Reddy, David DeLurgio, Venkat R. Iyer, Ganesh Venkataraman, Ashish Sadhu, Vamsee Yaganti, Kevin Trulock, Douglas N. Gibson, Mohamad Alkhouli, Manish Shah, Shephal K. Doshi, Andrea Natale, Megan Coylewright, C. Michael Gibson, Ahmed A. Kolkailah, Wael A. Jaber, Krystal Leger, Elizabeth Matznick, Thomas Christen, Brad S. Sutton, Kenneth M. Stein, Saibal Kar","doi":"10.1001/jama.2026.21361","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Importance Following a left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) procedure, antithrombotic therapy is administered to safely allow time for device endothelialization. However, the optimal postimplant antithrombotic regimen is unknown. Objective To determine if either reduced-dose non–vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) or aspirin alone are noninferior to dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for the composite clinical end point of death, stroke, systemic embolism, or major bleeding through 6 months post LAAC. Design, Setting, and Participants This open-label, 3-group, multicenter clinical trial randomized 1857 patients between October 2024 and December 2025 at 87 US investigational sites, with the final 6-month follow-up in July 2026. Enrolled patients had nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, underwent successful LAAC, and were eligible for all 3 regimens. Interventions Patients were randomly allocated 1:1:1 to DAPT for 6 months followed by aspirin (n = 624), a reduced-dose NOAC for 3 months followed by aspirin (n = 620), or aspirin alone for 12 months (n = 613). Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was the 6-month composite of all-cause death, stroke, systemic embolism, or major bleeding. Noninferiority was tested in the primary analysis population with a 1-sided Farrington-Manning test (α = .025). Bleeding and 45-day device-related thrombus rates were exploratory without multiplicity adjustment. Results The cohort had a mean age of 76 (SD, 8) years, 42.9% were female, the mean CHA <jats:sub>2</jats:sub> DS <jats:sub>2</jats:sub> -VASc score was 4.2 (SD, 1.3), and 68.0% had paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. The primary outcome occurred in 41 patients (6.9%) with DAPT vs 31 (5.1%) with a reduced-dose NOAC (risk ratio, 0.75 [95% CI, 0.48-1.18]; risk difference, −1.7 percentage points; 97.5% upper bound, 1.2) and 20 (3.3%) with aspirin alone (risk ratio, 0.49 [95% CI, 0.29-0.82]; risk difference, −3.5 percentage points; 97.5% upper bound, −0.8). Both monotherapy strategies met noninferiority criteria ( <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> &amp;amp;lt; .001 for noninferiority for both). Major bleeding was 4.5% with DAPT, 2.7% with reduced-dose NOACs, and 1.7% with aspirin alone; clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding was 8.7%, 4.8%, and 3.8%, respectively. Device-related thrombus was observed in 3.4%, 0.9%, and 2.7%, respectively. Conclusions and Relevance Both reduced-dose NOACs and aspirin alone were noninferior to DAPT for 6-month outcomes after uncomplicated LAAC. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: <jats:ext-link xmlns:xlink=\"http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink\" ext-link-type=\"uri\" xlink:href=\"https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06521463\">NCT06521463</jats:ext-link>","PeriodicalId":518009,"journal":{"name":"JAMA","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2026.21361","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance Following a left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) procedure, antithrombotic therapy is administered to safely allow time for device endothelialization. However, the optimal postimplant antithrombotic regimen is unknown. Objective To determine if either reduced-dose non–vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) or aspirin alone are noninferior to dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for the composite clinical end point of death, stroke, systemic embolism, or major bleeding through 6 months post LAAC. Design, Setting, and Participants This open-label, 3-group, multicenter clinical trial randomized 1857 patients between October 2024 and December 2025 at 87 US investigational sites, with the final 6-month follow-up in July 2026. Enrolled patients had nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, underwent successful LAAC, and were eligible for all 3 regimens. Interventions Patients were randomly allocated 1:1:1 to DAPT for 6 months followed by aspirin (n = 624), a reduced-dose NOAC for 3 months followed by aspirin (n = 620), or aspirin alone for 12 months (n = 613). Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was the 6-month composite of all-cause death, stroke, systemic embolism, or major bleeding. Noninferiority was tested in the primary analysis population with a 1-sided Farrington-Manning test (α = .025). Bleeding and 45-day device-related thrombus rates were exploratory without multiplicity adjustment. Results The cohort had a mean age of 76 (SD, 8) years, 42.9% were female, the mean CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score was 4.2 (SD, 1.3), and 68.0% had paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. The primary outcome occurred in 41 patients (6.9%) with DAPT vs 31 (5.1%) with a reduced-dose NOAC (risk ratio, 0.75 [95% CI, 0.48-1.18]; risk difference, −1.7 percentage points; 97.5% upper bound, 1.2) and 20 (3.3%) with aspirin alone (risk ratio, 0.49 [95% CI, 0.29-0.82]; risk difference, −3.5 percentage points; 97.5% upper bound, −0.8). Both monotherapy strategies met noninferiority criteria ( P &amp;lt; .001 for noninferiority for both). Major bleeding was 4.5% with DAPT, 2.7% with reduced-dose NOACs, and 1.7% with aspirin alone; clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding was 8.7%, 4.8%, and 3.8%, respectively. Device-related thrombus was observed in 3.4%, 0.9%, and 2.7%, respectively. Conclusions and Relevance Both reduced-dose NOACs and aspirin alone were noninferior to DAPT for 6-month outcomes after uncomplicated LAAC. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT06521463
左心耳闭塞后的抗血栓治疗
重要性:在左心耳闭合(LAAC)手术后,要进行抗血栓治疗,以便有时间安全地进行器械内皮化。然而,最佳的移植后抗血栓治疗方案尚不清楚。目的探讨减少剂量非维生素K口服抗凝剂(NOACs)或单独使用阿司匹林在LAAC术后6个月死亡、中风、全身栓塞或大出血的复合临床终点方面是否优于双重抗血小板治疗(DAPT)。这项开放标签、三组、多中心临床试验于2024年10月至2025年12月在美国87个研究地点随机选取了1857名患者,最后6个月的随访于2026年7月进行。入选的患者患有非瓣膜性心房颤动,接受了成功的LAAC,并且符合所有3种方案。干预措施患者以1:1:1的比例随机分配至DAPT组,为期6个月,随后服用阿司匹林(n = 624),减少剂量NOAC组3个月,随后服用阿司匹林(n = 620),或单独服用阿司匹林12个月(n = 613)。主要结局和测量主要结局是6个月的全因死亡、中风、全身性栓塞或大出血的综合结果。在主要分析人群中采用单侧法灵顿-曼宁检验进行非劣效性检验(α = 0.025)。出血和45天器械相关血栓率是探索性的,没有多重调整。结果本组患者平均年龄76岁(SD, 8),女性占42.9%,CHA 2 ds2 -VASc平均评分4.2 (SD, 1.3),发作性房颤占68.0%。主要结局发生在41例DAPT患者(6.9%)vs 31例减少剂量NOAC患者(5.1%)(风险比0.75 [95% CI, 0.48-1.18];风险差为- 1.7个百分点;上限为97.5%,1.2)和20例单独使用阿司匹林患者(风险比0.49 [95% CI, 0.29-0.82];风险差为- 3.5个百分点;上限为97.5%,-0.8)。两种单药治疗策略均符合非劣效性标准(P &lt;)。001表示两者的非劣效性)。DAPT组大出血率为4.5%,减少剂量NOACs组为2.7%,单独使用阿司匹林组为1.7%;临床相关的非大出血分别为8.7%、4.8%和3.8%。器械相关血栓发生率分别为3.4%、0.9%和2.7%。结论和相关性对于无并发症LAAC术后6个月的预后,减少剂量noac和单独使用阿司匹林均不逊色于DAPT。临床试验注册ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT06521463
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书