Combined Nav1.7-Nav1.8 channel abrogation: Supralinear suppression of excitability in a subpopulation of peripheral sensory neurons.

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 PHYSIOLOGY
Journal of General Physiology Pub Date : 2027-01-04 Epub Date: 2026-10-30 DOI:10.1085/jgp.202614101
Dmytro Vasylyev, Sidharth Tyagi, Mohammad-Reza Ghovanloo, Peng Zhao, Stephen G Waxman
{"title":"Combined Nav1.7-Nav1.8 channel abrogation: Supralinear suppression of excitability in a subpopulation of peripheral sensory neurons.","authors":"Dmytro Vasylyev, Sidharth Tyagi, Mohammad-Reza Ghovanloo, Peng Zhao, Stephen G Waxman","doi":"10.1085/jgp.202614101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There is a pressing need for nonaddictive pain therapeutics. Despite the genetic validation of peripheral voltage-gated sodium (Nav) channels as targets for non-opioid pain therapy, isoform-selective inhibition of Nav1.7 and Nav1.8 has yielded limited efficacy in clinical studies, with Nav1.8 blockade providing statistically significant but only partial pain relief. This raises the question: if block of Nav1.8 relieves pain only partially, what is needed for better pain relief? In this study, we utilized dynamic clamp, which permits precisely calibrated functional addition or subtraction of the current from any given channel, to systematically interrogate the combinatorial landscape of multiplex abrogation of currents from Nav1.7 and Nav1.8, both major contributors to electrogenesis within dorsal root ganglion neurons. We demonstrate that partial, simultaneous attenuation of both conductances drives a supralinear increase in current threshold in many sensory neurons. Responses to Nav1.8 functional subtraction span a broad spectrum, whereas responses to Nav1.7 subtraction are comparatively uniform. Neurons with greater sensitivity to functional loss of Nav1.8 show greater suppression of excitability during combined Nav1.7-Nav1.8 attenuation, while weak Nav1.8 responders remain comparatively resistant. These findings identify electrogenic dependence on Nav1.8 as a major source of functional heterogeneity in sensory neurons and demonstrate that Nav1.7 acts cooperatively with Nav1.8 to shape the consequences of channel attenuation. Our results indicate that combined Nav1.7-Nav1.8 targeting should outperform isoform-selective block in suppressing firing in a subpopulation of pain-signaling neurons, while not producing universal suppression.</p>","PeriodicalId":54828,"journal":{"name":"Journal of General Physiology","volume":"159 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2027-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of General Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1085/jgp.202614101","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/10/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is a pressing need for nonaddictive pain therapeutics. Despite the genetic validation of peripheral voltage-gated sodium (Nav) channels as targets for non-opioid pain therapy, isoform-selective inhibition of Nav1.7 and Nav1.8 has yielded limited efficacy in clinical studies, with Nav1.8 blockade providing statistically significant but only partial pain relief. This raises the question: if block of Nav1.8 relieves pain only partially, what is needed for better pain relief? In this study, we utilized dynamic clamp, which permits precisely calibrated functional addition or subtraction of the current from any given channel, to systematically interrogate the combinatorial landscape of multiplex abrogation of currents from Nav1.7 and Nav1.8, both major contributors to electrogenesis within dorsal root ganglion neurons. We demonstrate that partial, simultaneous attenuation of both conductances drives a supralinear increase in current threshold in many sensory neurons. Responses to Nav1.8 functional subtraction span a broad spectrum, whereas responses to Nav1.7 subtraction are comparatively uniform. Neurons with greater sensitivity to functional loss of Nav1.8 show greater suppression of excitability during combined Nav1.7-Nav1.8 attenuation, while weak Nav1.8 responders remain comparatively resistant. These findings identify electrogenic dependence on Nav1.8 as a major source of functional heterogeneity in sensory neurons and demonstrate that Nav1.7 acts cooperatively with Nav1.8 to shape the consequences of channel attenuation. Our results indicate that combined Nav1.7-Nav1.8 targeting should outperform isoform-selective block in suppressing firing in a subpopulation of pain-signaling neurons, while not producing universal suppression.

Nav1.7-Nav1.8通道的联合废除:外周感觉神经元亚群兴奋性的超线性抑制。
我们迫切需要非成瘾性疼痛疗法。尽管外周电压门控钠(Nav)通道作为非阿片类药物疼痛治疗的靶点得到了遗传验证,但在临床研究中,同种型选择性抑制Nav1.7和Nav1.8的效果有限,Nav1.8阻断提供了统计学上显著的但仅部分缓解疼痛。这就提出了一个问题:如果阻断Nav1.8只能部分缓解疼痛,那么需要什么才能更好地缓解疼痛?在这项研究中,我们利用动态钳,它允许精确校准来自任何给定通道的电流的功能加法或减法,系统地询问来自Nav1.7和Nav1.8的多重电流消除的组合景观,这两个都是背根神经节神经元内电生成的主要贡献者。我们证明,在许多感觉神经元中,两个电导的部分同时衰减驱动电流阈值的超线性增加。对Nav1.8功能减法的反应范围很广,而对Nav1.7功能减法的反应相对均匀。对Nav1.8功能丧失更敏感的神经元在Nav1.7-Nav1.8联合衰减过程中表现出更大的兴奋性抑制,而弱Nav1.8应答者保持相对抗性。这些发现确定了对Nav1.8的电致依赖性是感觉神经元功能异质性的主要来源,并表明Nav1.7与Nav1.8协同作用,形成通道衰减的后果。我们的研究结果表明,联合靶向Nav1.7-Nav1.8在抑制疼痛信号神经元亚群的放电方面应该优于同种型选择性阻断,而不是产生普遍抑制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
10.50%
发文量
88
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: General physiology is the study of biological mechanisms through analytical investigations, which decipher the molecular and cellular mechanisms underlying biological function at all levels of organization. The mission of Journal of General Physiology (JGP) is to publish mechanistic and quantitative molecular and cellular physiology of the highest quality, to provide a best-in-class author experience, and to nurture future generations of independent researchers. The major emphasis is on physiological problems at the cellular and molecular level.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书