Urgent Care Radiography for Low Back Pain Is Rarely Followed by Emergency Advanced Imaging.

Michael Hood, Joel K R Samuel, Praneet Khanna, Ali Ebada, Arya Rao, Marc D Succi
{"title":"Urgent Care Radiography for Low Back Pain Is Rarely Followed by Emergency Advanced Imaging.","authors":"Michael Hood, Joel K R Samuel, Praneet Khanna, Ali Ebada, Arya Rao, Marc D Succi","doi":"10.1016/j.jacr.2026.10.023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Workup of low back pain (LBP) in emergency departments (EDs) commonly involves CT or MRI, even though guidelines reserve advanced imaging for patients with red flags. We measured how often urgent care center (UCC) radiography for low-acuity LBP was followed by advanced imaging in the ED within 30 days, and compared per-study resource intensity between UCC radiography and ED CT or MRI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study included adults imaged for LBP at 23 UCCs and affiliated EDs between 2019 and 2025. We excluded red-flag presentations by screening keywords from the order indication. We identified 30-day returns by linking medical record numbers between cohorts, and two radiologists reviewed each one. Resource intensity was measured as Total Relative Value Units (RVU) per study, converted to approximate Medicare-allowed dollars.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 16,754 studies (2,924 UCC radiographs, 13,830 ED studies) from 15,759 patients, UCC patients were younger (median 50 vs 67 years, P < 0.001). Median Total RVU was 1.43 (UCC) versus 5.14 (ED) (about $48 vs $171, P < 0.001). Twenty-four UCC studies were followed by ED advanced imaging within 30 days (0.82%, 95% CI 0.55-1.22), 12 within 24 hours. Radiologists judged one return a true radiographic miss. Return rates were similar across UCC networks (P = 1.00).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>UCC radiography for low-acuity LBP was rarely followed by ED advanced imaging within 30 days and entailed lower per-study imaging resource use than ED CT or MRI.</p>","PeriodicalId":73968,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2026.10.023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Workup of low back pain (LBP) in emergency departments (EDs) commonly involves CT or MRI, even though guidelines reserve advanced imaging for patients with red flags. We measured how often urgent care center (UCC) radiography for low-acuity LBP was followed by advanced imaging in the ED within 30 days, and compared per-study resource intensity between UCC radiography and ED CT or MRI.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study included adults imaged for LBP at 23 UCCs and affiliated EDs between 2019 and 2025. We excluded red-flag presentations by screening keywords from the order indication. We identified 30-day returns by linking medical record numbers between cohorts, and two radiologists reviewed each one. Resource intensity was measured as Total Relative Value Units (RVU) per study, converted to approximate Medicare-allowed dollars.

Results: Among 16,754 studies (2,924 UCC radiographs, 13,830 ED studies) from 15,759 patients, UCC patients were younger (median 50 vs 67 years, P < 0.001). Median Total RVU was 1.43 (UCC) versus 5.14 (ED) (about $48 vs $171, P < 0.001). Twenty-four UCC studies were followed by ED advanced imaging within 30 days (0.82%, 95% CI 0.55-1.22), 12 within 24 hours. Radiologists judged one return a true radiographic miss. Return rates were similar across UCC networks (P = 1.00).

Discussion: UCC radiography for low-acuity LBP was rarely followed by ED advanced imaging within 30 days and entailed lower per-study imaging resource use than ED CT or MRI.

腰痛的紧急护理x线摄影很少随后进行紧急高级成像。
目的:急诊科(ed)腰痛(LBP)的检查通常涉及CT或MRI,尽管指南保留对有危险信号的患者进行高级影像学检查。我们测量了30天内急诊中心(UCC)低度数下腰痛患者在急诊中心(UCC) x线摄影后进行高级影像学检查的频率,并比较了UCC x线摄影与急诊CT或MRI之间的每项研究资源强度。方法:这项回顾性队列研究纳入了2019年至2025年间在23个UCCs和附属EDs进行腰痛成像的成年人。我们通过筛选顺序指示中的关键字来排除红旗演示。我们通过将队列之间的医疗记录号码联系起来,确定了30天的回报,并由两名放射科医生对每个病例进行了审查。资源强度以每项研究的总相对价值单位(RVU)来衡量,转换为近似的医疗保险允许的美元。结果:在15,759例患者的16,754项研究(2,924例UCC x线片,13,830例ED研究)中,UCC患者较年轻(中位年龄为50岁vs 67岁,P < 0.001)。中位总RVU为1.43 (UCC) vs 5.14 (ED)(约48美元vs 171美元,P < 0.001)。24例UCC研究在30天内进行ED高级成像(0.82%,95% CI 0.55-1.22), 12例在24小时内进行。放射科医生将一次复诊判断为真正的放射检查失误。不同UCC网络的复诊率相似(P = 1.00)。讨论:低视力LBP的UCC x线摄影很少在30天内进行ED高级成像,并且与ED CT或MRI相比,每次研究的成像资源使用更少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书