A novel referral system to optimize timing to specialized palliative care in patients with advanced cancer: an interventional study.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Oncologist Pub Date : 2026-10-28 DOI:10.1093/oncolo/oyag428
Giacomo Massa, Ernesto Zecca, Gabriele Tinè, Alessia Garavaglia, Antonino Tallarita, Andra D Dumitrascu, Eleonora Cristarella, Alessandra Pigni, Rosalba Miceli, Paolo G Casali, Lisa Licitra, Filippo G M deBraud, Cinzia Brunelli, Augusto F T Caraceni
{"title":"A novel referral system to optimize timing to specialized palliative care in patients with advanced cancer: an interventional study.","authors":"Giacomo Massa, Ernesto Zecca, Gabriele Tinè, Alessia Garavaglia, Antonino Tallarita, Andra D Dumitrascu, Eleonora Cristarella, Alessandra Pigni, Rosalba Miceli, Paolo G Casali, Lisa Licitra, Filippo G M deBraud, Cinzia Brunelli, Augusto F T Caraceni","doi":"10.1093/oncolo/oyag428","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Early integration of specialist palliative care (PC) improves outcomes for patients with advanced cancer, yet implementation of needs-based referral remains inconsistent in routine oncology practice. The Palliative Care Referral System (PCRS) is a digital clinical decision-support tool designed to support referral using patient-reported symptoms, prognostic indicators, and clinical complexity. We evaluated the impact of PCRS implementation on referral patterns, patient-centered outcomes, healthcare utilization, and end-of-life (EoL) care.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>In this single-center prospective quasi-experimental pre-post implementation study, 380 patients with advanced solid tumors were enrolled before (Pre-PCRS, n = 190) and after (Post-PCRS, n = 190) PCRS implementation. During the Post-PCRS phase, oncologists completed the PCRS at each outpatient visit. Patient and caregiver satisfaction, quality of life, healthcare utilization, and EoL indicators were assessed monthly for six months. Time to first PC referral was analyzed using competing-risk methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall 24-week referral rates were similar in the Post-PCRS and Pre-PCRS cohorts (21% vs 20%). However, referral timing and patterns changed across tumor types, with earlier referrals in breast and prostate cancer after PCRS implementation. The proportion of patients with at least one hospitalization was numerically lower after implementation (16% vs 27%; OR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.32-0.88; p = 0.017), but the difference was not significant after correction for multiple comparisons (p = 0.085). No significant differences were observed in patient or caregiver satisfaction, quality of life, emergency department visits, oncology visits, or PC visits. Indicators of aggressive EoL care were not significantly different between cohorts.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PCRS implementation did not increase the overall referral rate but was associated with changes in referral timing and patterns across tumor types. Whether these changes reflect more appropriate, needs-based care and translate into lower healthcare utilization requires confirmation in larger studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":54686,"journal":{"name":"Oncologist","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncologist","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oncolo/oyag428","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Early integration of specialist palliative care (PC) improves outcomes for patients with advanced cancer, yet implementation of needs-based referral remains inconsistent in routine oncology practice. The Palliative Care Referral System (PCRS) is a digital clinical decision-support tool designed to support referral using patient-reported symptoms, prognostic indicators, and clinical complexity. We evaluated the impact of PCRS implementation on referral patterns, patient-centered outcomes, healthcare utilization, and end-of-life (EoL) care.

Patients and methods: In this single-center prospective quasi-experimental pre-post implementation study, 380 patients with advanced solid tumors were enrolled before (Pre-PCRS, n = 190) and after (Post-PCRS, n = 190) PCRS implementation. During the Post-PCRS phase, oncologists completed the PCRS at each outpatient visit. Patient and caregiver satisfaction, quality of life, healthcare utilization, and EoL indicators were assessed monthly for six months. Time to first PC referral was analyzed using competing-risk methods.

Results: Overall 24-week referral rates were similar in the Post-PCRS and Pre-PCRS cohorts (21% vs 20%). However, referral timing and patterns changed across tumor types, with earlier referrals in breast and prostate cancer after PCRS implementation. The proportion of patients with at least one hospitalization was numerically lower after implementation (16% vs 27%; OR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.32-0.88; p = 0.017), but the difference was not significant after correction for multiple comparisons (p = 0.085). No significant differences were observed in patient or caregiver satisfaction, quality of life, emergency department visits, oncology visits, or PC visits. Indicators of aggressive EoL care were not significantly different between cohorts.

Conclusions: PCRS implementation did not increase the overall referral rate but was associated with changes in referral timing and patterns across tumor types. Whether these changes reflect more appropriate, needs-based care and translate into lower healthcare utilization requires confirmation in larger studies.

一个新的转诊系统,以优化时间的专科姑息治疗晚期癌症患者:一项介入性研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Oncologist
Oncologist 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
309
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Oncologist® is dedicated to translating the latest research developments into the best multidimensional care for cancer patients. Thus, The Oncologist is committed to helping physicians excel in this ever-expanding environment through the publication of timely reviews, original studies, and commentaries on important developments. We believe that the practice of oncology requires both an understanding of a range of disciplines encompassing basic science related to cancer, translational research, and clinical practice, but also the socioeconomic and psychosocial factors that determine access to care and quality of life and function following cancer treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书