Cell-type-resolved colocalisation prioritises KCNIP2 as a candidate epilepsy drug-target detectable at inhibitory-neuron but not bulk-tissue resolution: a Mendelian randomisation and colocalisation study.

IF 3 3区 生物学 Q2 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Frontiers in Genetics Pub Date : 2026-10-14 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fgene.2026.1920945
Aytac Gul
{"title":"Cell-type-resolved colocalisation prioritises <i>KCNIP2</i> as a candidate epilepsy drug-target detectable at inhibitory-neuron but not bulk-tissue resolution: a Mendelian randomisation and colocalisation study.","authors":"Aytac Gul","doi":"10.3389/fgene.2026.1920945","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Most antiseizure medicines act on a limited set of neuronal targets. Approximately a third of patients have treatment-resistant epilepsy, creating a need for mechanistically distinct drug targets. Human genetics can prioritise them, but epilepsy target-discovery has measured expression in plasma or bulk brain tissue and has yielded inconsistent candidate lists. Common-variant association for generalised epilepsy is enriched in neuronally expressed genes, so the cell type measured may determine which druggable targets are detectable. Genes at the genome-wide significant loci of the largest epilepsy meta-analysis were assessed by drug-target Mendelian randomisation (MR). A gene was retained only where the expression and disease signals colocalised on a single causal variant at a posterior probability above 0.8. Each gene was assessed across inhibitory neurons, excitatory neurons, four glial cell types, and bulk cortex, with fine-mapping and directional testing in FinnGen. Of the 23 prioritised genes screened, MR nominated ten and colocalisation retained 2. <i>KCNIP2</i> colocalised with generalised epilepsy above the threshold in inhibitory neurons alone. Higher expression was associated with lower risk (posterior 0.95, odds ratio (OR) 0.64, and <i>p</i> = 2.5 × 10<sup>-11</sup>), with a weaker, directionally concordant sub-threshold signal in oligodendrocytes (posterior 0.53). The colocalising variant is shared with the neighbouring <i>CUEDC2</i> (<i>r</i> <sup>2</sup> = 0.975), so the two genes cannot be separated on genetic evidence alone. In the bulk cortex, <i>KCNIP2</i> carried a strong expression signal mapping to a different causal variant, with no colocalisation. <i>AP3D1</i> colocalised across inhibitory neurons, excitatory neurons, and bulk cortex for generalised epilepsy and was associated with increased risk (OR 1.46). Both directions reproduced at the matched generalised-epilepsy endpoint in FinnGen, where <i>KCNIP2</i> was protective and <i>AP3D1</i> was risk-increasing. The colocalisation did not reproduce there, so FinnGen supports the direction of effect and not the shared-variant evidence. In epilepsy, the cellular compartment in which expression is measured can determine whether a drug-target signal is detected, so analyses restricted to plasma or bulk tissue may miss cell-type-restricted targets such as <i>KCNIP2</i>. The demonstration rests on this single locus. Cell-type-resolved colocalisation prioritises <i>KCNIP2</i>, which cannot be separated from <i>CUEDC2</i>, as a candidate for functional investigation, with <i>AP3D1</i> being a genetically supported but pharmacologically intractable second locus.</p>","PeriodicalId":12750,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Genetics","volume":"17 ","pages":"1920945"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13713021/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2026.1920945","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Most antiseizure medicines act on a limited set of neuronal targets. Approximately a third of patients have treatment-resistant epilepsy, creating a need for mechanistically distinct drug targets. Human genetics can prioritise them, but epilepsy target-discovery has measured expression in plasma or bulk brain tissue and has yielded inconsistent candidate lists. Common-variant association for generalised epilepsy is enriched in neuronally expressed genes, so the cell type measured may determine which druggable targets are detectable. Genes at the genome-wide significant loci of the largest epilepsy meta-analysis were assessed by drug-target Mendelian randomisation (MR). A gene was retained only where the expression and disease signals colocalised on a single causal variant at a posterior probability above 0.8. Each gene was assessed across inhibitory neurons, excitatory neurons, four glial cell types, and bulk cortex, with fine-mapping and directional testing in FinnGen. Of the 23 prioritised genes screened, MR nominated ten and colocalisation retained 2. KCNIP2 colocalised with generalised epilepsy above the threshold in inhibitory neurons alone. Higher expression was associated with lower risk (posterior 0.95, odds ratio (OR) 0.64, and p = 2.5 × 10-11), with a weaker, directionally concordant sub-threshold signal in oligodendrocytes (posterior 0.53). The colocalising variant is shared with the neighbouring CUEDC2 (r 2 = 0.975), so the two genes cannot be separated on genetic evidence alone. In the bulk cortex, KCNIP2 carried a strong expression signal mapping to a different causal variant, with no colocalisation. AP3D1 colocalised across inhibitory neurons, excitatory neurons, and bulk cortex for generalised epilepsy and was associated with increased risk (OR 1.46). Both directions reproduced at the matched generalised-epilepsy endpoint in FinnGen, where KCNIP2 was protective and AP3D1 was risk-increasing. The colocalisation did not reproduce there, so FinnGen supports the direction of effect and not the shared-variant evidence. In epilepsy, the cellular compartment in which expression is measured can determine whether a drug-target signal is detected, so analyses restricted to plasma or bulk tissue may miss cell-type-restricted targets such as KCNIP2. The demonstration rests on this single locus. Cell-type-resolved colocalisation prioritises KCNIP2, which cannot be separated from CUEDC2, as a candidate for functional investigation, with AP3D1 being a genetically supported but pharmacologically intractable second locus.

一项孟德尔随机化和共定位研究表明,细胞类型分辨的共定位优先考虑KCNIP2作为一种候选癫痫药物靶标,可在抑制性神经元中检测到,但不能在大组织分辨率中检测到。
大多数抗癫痫药物作用于一组有限的神经元靶点。大约有三分之一的患者患有难治性癫痫,这就需要有不同的药物靶点。人类遗传学可以对它们进行优先排序,但癫痫靶标发现已经测量了血浆或大块脑组织中的表达,并且产生了不一致的候选列表。广泛性癫痫的常见变异关联在神经元表达基因中丰富,因此测量的细胞类型可能决定可检测到哪些药物靶点。最大癫痫荟萃分析的全基因组显著位点的基因通过药物靶向孟德尔随机化(MR)进行评估。只有当表达和疾病信号在一个单一的因果变异上共定位且后验概率大于0.8时,一个基因才会被保留。每个基因在抑制性神经元、兴奋性神经元、四种胶质细胞类型和大块皮层中进行评估,并在FinnGen中进行精细定位和定向测试。在筛选的23个优先基因中,MR提名了10个,共定位保留了2个。KCNIP2仅在抑制性神经元中与全身性癫痫共定位高于阈值。高表达与低风险相关(后验0.95,比值比(OR) 0.64, p = 2.5 × 10-11),少突胶质细胞的亚阈值信号较弱,方向一致(后验0.53)。共定位变异与邻近的CUEDC2共享(r 2 = 0.975),因此不能仅凭遗传证据将这两个基因分开。在大块皮质中,KCNIP2携带一个强烈的表达信号,映射到一个不同的因果变异,没有共定位。AP3D1共定位于全身性癫痫的抑制性神经元、兴奋性神经元和大块皮质,并与风险增加相关(OR 1.46)。在FinnGen的匹配的广泛性癫痫终点,这两个方向都重现了,KCNIP2具有保护作用,而AP3D1具有增加风险的作用。共域化并没有在那里重现,所以FinnGen支持效应的方向,而不是共享变异的证据。在癫痫中,测量表达的细胞室可以确定是否检测到药物靶标信号,因此仅限于血浆或大块组织的分析可能会错过细胞类型受限的靶标,如KCNIP2。论证就建立在这一个地方。细胞类型解决的共定位优先考虑KCNIP2,它不能与CUEDC2分离,作为功能研究的候选者,AP3D1是遗传上支持的,但药理学上难以解决的第二个位点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Genetics
Frontiers in Genetics Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Molecular Medicine
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
8.10%
发文量
3491
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Genetics publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research on genes and genomes relating to all the domains of life, from humans to plants to livestock and other model organisms. Led by an outstanding Editorial Board of the world’s leading experts, this multidisciplinary, open-access journal is at the forefront of communicating cutting-edge research to researchers, academics, clinicians, policy makers and the public. The study of inheritance and the impact of the genome on various biological processes is well documented. However, the majority of discoveries are still to come. A new era is seeing major developments in the function and variability of the genome, the use of genetic and genomic tools and the analysis of the genetic basis of various biological phenomena.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书