Real-World Safety Profile of Mirvetuximab Soravtansine: A Population-Based Pharmacovigilance Study Leveraging FAERS and EudraVigilance Databases.

IF 3.7 4区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Zhiwei Cui, Ping Song, De Xie, Fan Zou, Yingge Ao, Yuyang Cui, Gongming Dong, Zhen Zhai
{"title":"Real-World Safety Profile of Mirvetuximab Soravtansine: A Population-Based Pharmacovigilance Study Leveraging FAERS and EudraVigilance Databases.","authors":"Zhiwei Cui, Ping Song, De Xie, Fan Zou, Yingge Ao, Yuyang Cui, Gongming Dong, Zhen Zhai","doi":"10.1016/j.clinthera.2026.09.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Mirvetuximab soravtansine (MIRV) is the first FDA-approved antibody-drug conjugate targeting folate receptor-α (FRα)-positive platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. Despite its clinical adoption, comprehensive post-marketing real-world evidence regarding its safety profile remains limited. This study aimed to systematically characterize the adverse event (AE) profile of MIRV in real-world settings and to identify potential safety signals using large-scale pharmacovigilance databases.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective pharmacovigilance analysis was conducted using adverse event reports from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS, 2022-2025). We excluded all reports submitted for male patients. Safety signals were assessed at the system organ class (SOC), standardized MedDRA query (SMQ), and preferred term (PT) levels. Disproportionality analyses were performed using 4 algorithms: reporting odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio (PRR), Bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN), and multi-item gamma Poisson shrinker (MGPS). Time-to-onset (TTO) analysis was conducted to evaluate onset patterns. External validation was performed using the EudraVigilance database.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>A total of 1,249 MIRV-related reports corresponding to 2,577 AEs were identified in FAERS. At the SOC level, eye disorders were the most frequently reported AEs (n = 593) and demonstrated the strongest disproportionality signal (ROR: 13.79, 95% CI: 12.58-15.12). At the PT level, the 3 most frequently reported AEs were vision blurred (n = 97), neuropathy peripheral (n = 95), and cataract (n = 75). Among detected safety signals, the strongest disproportionality signals (ranked by IC025 value) were observed for keratitis (ROR: 390.64, PRR: 383.08, EBGM05: 269.06, IC025: 5.06), keratopathy (ROR: 487.9, PRR: 479.78, EBGM05: 323.68, IC025: 4.87), and pneumonitis (ROR: 56.93, PRR: 55.37, EBGM05: 43.35, IC0254.64). Overall, 44 positive PT-level signals were identified. Common labeled AEs included blurred vision, peripheral neuropathy, cataract, diarrhoea, and abdominal pain. Potentially novel (unlabeled) signals included blindness, colitis, pulmonary fibrosis, glaucoma, intestinal perforation, and astigmatism. Time-to-onset analysis showed that 42.9% of AEs occurred within the first month after treatment initiation, indicating an early-onset pattern. In the EudraVigilance database, 527 MIRV-related reports were identified. At the SOC level, eye disorders again demonstrated the strongest disproportionality signal, consistent with the findings from FAERS. At the PT level, the most frequently reported AEs were pneumonitis (n = 47), peripheral neuropathy (n = 45), and vision blurred (n = 43), whereas keratitis, keratopathy, and pneumonitis exhibited the strongest disproportionality signals. A total of 29 overlapping positive signals were identified between FAERS and EudraVigilance, further supporting the robustness of the observed safety signals.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>This dual-database pharmacovigilance study provides consistent real-world evidence supporting the established ocular toxicity profile of MIRV and identifies additional potential safety signals requiring further clinical attention. These findings may assist clinicians in optimizing risk assessment and monitoring strategies for patients receiving MIRV.</p>","PeriodicalId":10699,"journal":{"name":"Clinical therapeutics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinthera.2026.09.015","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Mirvetuximab soravtansine (MIRV) is the first FDA-approved antibody-drug conjugate targeting folate receptor-α (FRα)-positive platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. Despite its clinical adoption, comprehensive post-marketing real-world evidence regarding its safety profile remains limited. This study aimed to systematically characterize the adverse event (AE) profile of MIRV in real-world settings and to identify potential safety signals using large-scale pharmacovigilance databases.

Methods: A retrospective pharmacovigilance analysis was conducted using adverse event reports from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS, 2022-2025). We excluded all reports submitted for male patients. Safety signals were assessed at the system organ class (SOC), standardized MedDRA query (SMQ), and preferred term (PT) levels. Disproportionality analyses were performed using 4 algorithms: reporting odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio (PRR), Bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN), and multi-item gamma Poisson shrinker (MGPS). Time-to-onset (TTO) analysis was conducted to evaluate onset patterns. External validation was performed using the EudraVigilance database.

Findings: A total of 1,249 MIRV-related reports corresponding to 2,577 AEs were identified in FAERS. At the SOC level, eye disorders were the most frequently reported AEs (n = 593) and demonstrated the strongest disproportionality signal (ROR: 13.79, 95% CI: 12.58-15.12). At the PT level, the 3 most frequently reported AEs were vision blurred (n = 97), neuropathy peripheral (n = 95), and cataract (n = 75). Among detected safety signals, the strongest disproportionality signals (ranked by IC025 value) were observed for keratitis (ROR: 390.64, PRR: 383.08, EBGM05: 269.06, IC025: 5.06), keratopathy (ROR: 487.9, PRR: 479.78, EBGM05: 323.68, IC025: 4.87), and pneumonitis (ROR: 56.93, PRR: 55.37, EBGM05: 43.35, IC0254.64). Overall, 44 positive PT-level signals were identified. Common labeled AEs included blurred vision, peripheral neuropathy, cataract, diarrhoea, and abdominal pain. Potentially novel (unlabeled) signals included blindness, colitis, pulmonary fibrosis, glaucoma, intestinal perforation, and astigmatism. Time-to-onset analysis showed that 42.9% of AEs occurred within the first month after treatment initiation, indicating an early-onset pattern. In the EudraVigilance database, 527 MIRV-related reports were identified. At the SOC level, eye disorders again demonstrated the strongest disproportionality signal, consistent with the findings from FAERS. At the PT level, the most frequently reported AEs were pneumonitis (n = 47), peripheral neuropathy (n = 45), and vision blurred (n = 43), whereas keratitis, keratopathy, and pneumonitis exhibited the strongest disproportionality signals. A total of 29 overlapping positive signals were identified between FAERS and EudraVigilance, further supporting the robustness of the observed safety signals.

Implications: This dual-database pharmacovigilance study provides consistent real-world evidence supporting the established ocular toxicity profile of MIRV and identifies additional potential safety signals requiring further clinical attention. These findings may assist clinicians in optimizing risk assessment and monitoring strategies for patients receiving MIRV.

Mirvetuximab Soravtansine的真实世界安全性:利用FAERS和EudraVigilance数据库进行的基于人群的药物警戒研究
Mirvetuximab soravtansine (MIRV)是fda批准的首个靶向叶酸受体-α (FRα)阳性铂耐药卵巢癌的抗体-药物偶联物。尽管其临床应用,但关于其安全性的全面上市后真实证据仍然有限。本研究旨在系统地描述MIRV在现实环境中的不良事件(AE)特征,并利用大规模药物警戒数据库识别潜在的安全信号。方法:采用FDA不良事件报告系统(FAERS, 2022-2025)的不良事件报告进行回顾性药物警戒分析。我们排除了所有男性患者的报告。安全信号在系统器官分类(SOC)、标准化MedDRA查询(SMQ)和首选术语(PT)级别进行评估。使用4种算法进行歧化分析:报告优势比(ROR)、比例报告比(PRR)、贝叶斯置信传播神经网络(BCPNN)和多项目伽玛泊松收缩器(MGPS)。发病时间(TTO)分析评价发病模式。使用EudraVigilance数据库进行外部验证。研究结果:FAERS中共发现1249例mirv相关报告,对应2577例ae。在SOC水平上,眼部疾病是最常报告的ae (n = 593),并表现出最强的歧化信号(ROR: 13.79, 95% CI: 12.58-15.12)。在PT水平上,最常报告的3种ae是视力模糊(n = 97),周围神经病变(n = 95)和白内障(n = 75)。在检测到的安全信号中,歧化信号最强的是角膜炎(ROR: 390.64, PRR: 383.08, EBGM05: 269.06, IC025: 5.06)、角膜病变(ROR: 487.9, PRR: 479.78, EBGM05: 323.68, IC025: 4.87)和肺炎(ROR: 56.93, PRR: 55.37, EBGM05: 43.35, IC0254.64)。总的来说,确定了44个阳性pt水平信号。常见的不良反应包括视力模糊、周围神经病变、白内障、腹泻和腹痛。潜在的新(未标记的)信号包括失明、结肠炎、肺纤维化、青光眼、肠穿孔和散光。发病时间分析显示,42.9%的ae发生在治疗开始后的第一个月内,表明早发模式。在EudraVigilance数据库中,确定了527份与mirv相关的报告。在SOC水平上,眼部疾病再次表现出最强的歧化信号,与FAERS的结果一致。在PT水平上,最常报道的ae是肺炎(n = 47)、周围神经病变(n = 45)和视力模糊(n = 43),而角膜炎、角膜病变和肺炎表现出最强的歧化信号。在FAERS和EudraVigilance之间共发现了29个重叠的阳性信号,进一步支持了观察到的安全信号的稳健性。意义:这项双数据库药物警戒研究提供了一致的真实证据,支持MIRV已建立的眼部毒性特征,并确定了需要进一步临床关注的其他潜在安全信号。这些发现可以帮助临床医生优化MIRV患者的风险评估和监测策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical therapeutics
Clinical therapeutics 医学-药学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
3.10%
发文量
154
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Therapeutics provides peer-reviewed, rapid publication of recent developments in drug and other therapies as well as in diagnostics, pharmacoeconomics, health policy, treatment outcomes, and innovations in drug and biologics research. In addition Clinical Therapeutics features updates on specific topics collated by expert Topic Editors. Clinical Therapeutics is read by a large international audience of scientists and clinicians in a variety of research, academic, and clinical practice settings. Articles are indexed by all major biomedical abstracting databases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书