An ensemble modeling approach for estimating expected patterns in mortality in the United States.

Q3 Mathematics
Lauren M Rossen, Jodi A Cisewski, Farida B Ahmad, Robert N Anderson
{"title":"An ensemble modeling approach for estimating expected patterns in mortality in the United States.","authors":"Lauren M Rossen, Jodi A Cisewski, Farida B Ahmad, Robert N Anderson","doi":"10.1515/em-2025-0035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Excess mortality statistics are critical for quantifying the impact of various public health disasters and epidemics, particularly when deaths directly attributable to a given event may be underestimated. The COVID-19 pandemic created challenges for monitoring excess mortality due to the prolonged elevations in mortality throughout the pandemic, and the difficulties in accurately forecasting expected mortality over long time horizons. Additionally, prior research has found that excess mortality estimates can vary depending on the model used and various analytic decisions. Ensemble modeling approaches can mitigate these limitations by incorporating information from multiple models and better accounting for the uncertainty around analytic choices.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the performance of an ensemble modeling approach to estimating excess mortality relative to methods that rely on single models.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study assesses an ensemble modeling approach to estimate excess mortality in the United States, based on weekly mortality data from the National Vital Statistics System from 2008 through 2024. We evaluated 76 candidate models with various long-term and seasonal trend specifications along with ensemble models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results indicate that an ensemble modeling approach offers more consistent and robust performance, with improved accuracy and coverage compared to individual models.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This analysis highlights the utility of ensemble modeling in providing robust estimates of expected mortality, a critical resource for public health preparedness and response in the face of disasters or epidemics.</p>","PeriodicalId":37999,"journal":{"name":"Epidemiologic Methods","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13693783/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epidemiologic Methods","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/em-2025-0035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Mathematics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Excess mortality statistics are critical for quantifying the impact of various public health disasters and epidemics, particularly when deaths directly attributable to a given event may be underestimated. The COVID-19 pandemic created challenges for monitoring excess mortality due to the prolonged elevations in mortality throughout the pandemic, and the difficulties in accurately forecasting expected mortality over long time horizons. Additionally, prior research has found that excess mortality estimates can vary depending on the model used and various analytic decisions. Ensemble modeling approaches can mitigate these limitations by incorporating information from multiple models and better accounting for the uncertainty around analytic choices.

Objective: To evaluate the performance of an ensemble modeling approach to estimating excess mortality relative to methods that rely on single models.

Methods: This study assesses an ensemble modeling approach to estimate excess mortality in the United States, based on weekly mortality data from the National Vital Statistics System from 2008 through 2024. We evaluated 76 candidate models with various long-term and seasonal trend specifications along with ensemble models.

Results: Results indicate that an ensemble modeling approach offers more consistent and robust performance, with improved accuracy and coverage compared to individual models.

Conclusions: This analysis highlights the utility of ensemble modeling in providing robust estimates of expected mortality, a critical resource for public health preparedness and response in the face of disasters or epidemics.

估算美国死亡率预期模式的集成建模方法。
背景:过高的死亡率统计数据对于量化各种公共卫生灾害和流行病的影响至关重要,特别是在直接归因于某一事件的死亡可能被低估的情况下。COVID-19大流行给监测超额死亡率带来了挑战,因为在整个大流行期间死亡率持续上升,而且难以准确预测长期预期死亡率。此外,先前的研究发现,根据所使用的模型和各种分析决策,超额死亡率估计可能会有所不同。集成建模方法可以通过合并来自多个模型的信息和更好地考虑围绕分析选择的不确定性来减轻这些限制。目的:评价综合建模方法相对于依赖单一模型的方法估算超额死亡率的性能。方法:本研究基于2008年至2024年美国国家生命统计系统的每周死亡率数据,评估了一种估算美国超额死亡率的集成建模方法。我们评估了76个候选模型,这些模型具有各种长期和季节性趋势规格以及集合模型。结果:结果表明,与单个模型相比,集成建模方法提供了更一致和健壮的性能,具有更高的准确性和覆盖率。结论:该分析强调了集成模型在提供可靠的预期死亡率估计方面的效用,这是面对灾害或流行病时公共卫生准备和响应的关键资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Epidemiologic Methods
Epidemiologic Methods Mathematics-Applied Mathematics
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
期刊介绍: Epidemiologic Methods (EM) seeks contributions comparable to those of the leading epidemiologic journals, but also invites papers that may be more technical or of greater length than what has traditionally been allowed by journals in epidemiology. Applications and examples with real data to illustrate methodology are strongly encouraged but not required. Topics. genetic epidemiology, infectious disease, pharmaco-epidemiology, ecologic studies, environmental exposures, screening, surveillance, social networks, comparative effectiveness, statistical modeling, causal inference, measurement error, study design, meta-analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书