Surgeons in North America and Asia-Pacific Adopt Various Practices Regarding Surgical Indications, Graft Selection, and Imaging Assessment in Pediatric Patients With Patellofemoral Instability.
Seth Ian Sim, Bo Xiang Bryan Neo, Daniel Green, James Hoi Po Hui, Zhou Zhilin
{"title":"Surgeons in North America and Asia-Pacific Adopt Various Practices Regarding Surgical Indications, Graft Selection, and Imaging Assessment in Pediatric Patients With Patellofemoral Instability.","authors":"Seth Ian Sim, Bo Xiang Bryan Neo, Daniel Green, James Hoi Po Hui, Zhou Zhilin","doi":"10.1002/ars2.70097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To characterize and compare current practice patterns in the evaluation and management of pediatric patellofemoral instability (PFI) between Asia-Pacific and North American surgeons.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive survey developed by the Paediatric Research in Sports Medicine Society Patellofemoral Instability Research Interest Group assessed surgeon practices across evaluation, imaging, indications, and surgical techniques for pediatric patients with PFI. The survey was distributed to Asia-Pacific Paediatric Research in Sports Medicine members from 2024 to 2025 and compared against previously published North American data from 2018 to 2019. Responses were analyzed to compare regional practices.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 127 subjects were included. Fifty-six Asia-Pacific orthopaedic surgeons and 56 North American orthopaedic surgeons managing pediatric PFI completed the survey. Most (89%) indicated surgery for large, symptomatic osteochondral fragments, with 90% routinely performing concomitant medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction. Marked regional variation was seen in graft selection: hamstring autograft predominated in Asia-Pacific (78% vs 23%, <i>P</i> < .001), whereas allograft was preferred in North America (59% vs 14%, <i>P</i> < .001). Fixation strategies in skeletally immature patients also differed, with Asia-Pacific surgeons more often using suture anchors at both the patella (75% vs 54%, <i>P</i> = .004) and femoral insertion (59% vs 26%, <i>P</i> < .001). Computed tomography use for rotational profiling (85% vs 7%) and tibial tubercle assessment (84% vs 2%) was markedly higher in Asia-Pacific. Patella-stabilizing braces (73% vs 30%) and longer immobilization were also more common regionally.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Significant regional variation exists in the management of pediatric PFI, particularly in graft choice, fixation technique, and imaging use.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>There is no universal consensus on the surgical management of PFI, and variation in practice may influence patient selection, surgical strategy, and outcomes. By characterizing similarities and differences in practice among Paediatric Research in Sports Medicine surgeons across geographic regions, this study identifies key areas of variability that can inform future research and guide the development of evidence-based standards to improve consistency and quality of care worldwide.</p>","PeriodicalId":34631,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"e70097"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13692318/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ars2.70097","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: To characterize and compare current practice patterns in the evaluation and management of pediatric patellofemoral instability (PFI) between Asia-Pacific and North American surgeons.
Methods: A comprehensive survey developed by the Paediatric Research in Sports Medicine Society Patellofemoral Instability Research Interest Group assessed surgeon practices across evaluation, imaging, indications, and surgical techniques for pediatric patients with PFI. The survey was distributed to Asia-Pacific Paediatric Research in Sports Medicine members from 2024 to 2025 and compared against previously published North American data from 2018 to 2019. Responses were analyzed to compare regional practices.
Results: A total of 127 subjects were included. Fifty-six Asia-Pacific orthopaedic surgeons and 56 North American orthopaedic surgeons managing pediatric PFI completed the survey. Most (89%) indicated surgery for large, symptomatic osteochondral fragments, with 90% routinely performing concomitant medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction. Marked regional variation was seen in graft selection: hamstring autograft predominated in Asia-Pacific (78% vs 23%, P < .001), whereas allograft was preferred in North America (59% vs 14%, P < .001). Fixation strategies in skeletally immature patients also differed, with Asia-Pacific surgeons more often using suture anchors at both the patella (75% vs 54%, P = .004) and femoral insertion (59% vs 26%, P < .001). Computed tomography use for rotational profiling (85% vs 7%) and tibial tubercle assessment (84% vs 2%) was markedly higher in Asia-Pacific. Patella-stabilizing braces (73% vs 30%) and longer immobilization were also more common regionally.
Conclusions: Significant regional variation exists in the management of pediatric PFI, particularly in graft choice, fixation technique, and imaging use.
Clinical relevance: There is no universal consensus on the surgical management of PFI, and variation in practice may influence patient selection, surgical strategy, and outcomes. By characterizing similarities and differences in practice among Paediatric Research in Sports Medicine surgeons across geographic regions, this study identifies key areas of variability that can inform future research and guide the development of evidence-based standards to improve consistency and quality of care worldwide.
目的:描述和比较亚太地区和北美地区外科医生目前评估和处理儿童髌骨不稳(PFI)的实践模式。方法:由运动医学学会髌骨不稳研究兴趣小组开展的一项综合调查评估了儿科PFI患者的外科医生在评估、成像、适应症和手术技术方面的做法。该调查于2024年至2025年分发给亚太运动医学儿科研究的成员,并与先前公布的2018年至2019年北美数据进行了比较。对回应进行分析,以比较区域做法。结果:共纳入受试者127例。56位亚太整形外科医生和56位北美整形外科医生完成了这项调查。大多数(89%)的患者表示对于大块的、有症状的骨软骨碎片需要手术治疗,其中90%的患者常规进行髌股内侧韧带重建。在移植物选择上存在明显的地区差异:腿筋自体移植物在亚太地区占主导地位(78% vs 23%, P P P =。结论:儿童PFI的处理存在显著的地区差异,特别是在移植物的选择、固定技术和影像学使用方面。临床相关性:对于PFI的手术治疗尚无普遍共识,实践中的差异可能会影响患者的选择、手术策略和结果。通过描述不同地理区域运动医学儿科研究外科医生实践中的异同,本研究确定了关键的可变性领域,可以为未来的研究提供信息,并指导以证据为基础的标准的发展,以提高全球护理的一致性和质量。