Evaluating paravertebral ozone injections versus passive physical modalities, as adjuncts to home exercise, for chronic non-specific low back pain: A randomized pilot study.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Naseh Yousefi, Mahdieh Saki, Kamyar Kazemi, Katayoun Moradi, Gholamreza Raissi, Bijan Forogh
{"title":"Evaluating paravertebral ozone injections versus passive physical modalities, as adjuncts to home exercise, for chronic non-specific low back pain: A randomized pilot study.","authors":"Naseh Yousefi, Mahdieh Saki, Kamyar Kazemi, Katayoun Moradi, Gholamreza Raissi, Bijan Forogh","doi":"10.1177/10538127261502126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundChronic non-specific low back pain (CNSLBP) is a major global cause of disability. While medical ozone injections have a long history, their comparative effectiveness against passive electrothermal modalities as adjuncts to exercise remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the preliminary clinical outcomes of these two adjunctive strategies.MethodsWe conducted a pilot randomized controlled trial with 64 adult patients suffering from CNSLBP. All participants were instructed in a standardized home exercise program. They were then randomly assigned to receive either three weekly sessions of paravertebral ozone injections or ten sessions of passive electrothermal modalities. The primary endpoint was functional disability measured by the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI version 2.1a) at 3 months post-intervention. Secondary outcomes included Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain scores at 1, 3, and 6 months.ResultsAt the 3-month primary endpoint for disability, ANCOVA adjusting for baseline ODI score, age, and BMI revealed no statistically significant between-group difference (adjusted mean difference [MD]: 2.67, 95% CI: -1.40 to 6.74; <math><mi>p</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>0.195</mn></math>). Similarly, no statistically significant between-group differences in pain intensity were detected at 1 month (<math><mi>p</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>0.095</mn></math>), 3 months (adjusted MD: 0.18, 95% CI: -1.03 to 1.39; <math><mi>p</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>0.767</mn></math>), or 6 months (<math><mi>p</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>0.119</mn></math>).ConclusionsIn patients with CNSLBP engaged in a structured home exercise program, no statistically significant differences in pain or functional disability were detected between adding a 3-session course of paravertebral ozone injections and adding a 10-session course of passive electrothermal modalities within this pilot study. Given the study design and sample size, these findings indicate a lack of statistically significant between-group differences. Larger, multi-arm definitive trials including an exercise-only control arm are required.</p>","PeriodicalId":15129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"10538127261502126"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10538127261502126","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundChronic non-specific low back pain (CNSLBP) is a major global cause of disability. While medical ozone injections have a long history, their comparative effectiveness against passive electrothermal modalities as adjuncts to exercise remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the preliminary clinical outcomes of these two adjunctive strategies.MethodsWe conducted a pilot randomized controlled trial with 64 adult patients suffering from CNSLBP. All participants were instructed in a standardized home exercise program. They were then randomly assigned to receive either three weekly sessions of paravertebral ozone injections or ten sessions of passive electrothermal modalities. The primary endpoint was functional disability measured by the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI version 2.1a) at 3 months post-intervention. Secondary outcomes included Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain scores at 1, 3, and 6 months.ResultsAt the 3-month primary endpoint for disability, ANCOVA adjusting for baseline ODI score, age, and BMI revealed no statistically significant between-group difference (adjusted mean difference [MD]: 2.67, 95% CI: -1.40 to 6.74; p=0.195). Similarly, no statistically significant between-group differences in pain intensity were detected at 1 month (p=0.095), 3 months (adjusted MD: 0.18, 95% CI: -1.03 to 1.39; p=0.767), or 6 months (p=0.119).ConclusionsIn patients with CNSLBP engaged in a structured home exercise program, no statistically significant differences in pain or functional disability were detected between adding a 3-session course of paravertebral ozone injections and adding a 10-session course of passive electrothermal modalities within this pilot study. Given the study design and sample size, these findings indicate a lack of statistically significant between-group differences. Larger, multi-arm definitive trials including an exercise-only control arm are required.

评估脊椎旁臭氧注射与被动物理模式,作为辅助家庭锻炼,慢性非特异性腰痛:一项随机试点研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
194
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation is a journal whose main focus is to present relevant information about the interdisciplinary approach to musculoskeletal rehabilitation for clinicians who treat patients with back and musculoskeletal pain complaints. It will provide readers with both 1) a general fund of knowledge on the assessment and management of specific problems and 2) new information considered to be state-of-the-art in the field. The intended audience is multidisciplinary as well as multi-specialty. In each issue clinicians can find information which they can use in their patient setting the very next day.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书