People Living With Dementia in Rural Areas are Most Likely to Report Unmet Service Needs in Home- and Community-Based Services in the United States

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Romil R. Parikh, Eric Jutkowitz, Jack M. Wolf, Benjamin W. Langworthy, Chanee D. Fabius, Stephanie Giordano, Tetyana P. Shippee
{"title":"People Living With Dementia in Rural Areas are Most Likely to Report Unmet Service Needs in Home- and Community-Based Services in the United States","authors":"Romil R. Parikh,&nbsp;Eric Jutkowitz,&nbsp;Jack M. Wolf,&nbsp;Benjamin W. Langworthy,&nbsp;Chanee D. Fabius,&nbsp;Stephanie Giordano,&nbsp;Tetyana P. Shippee","doi":"10.1111/jrh.70230","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>Most older adults prefer aging in place, for which home- and community-based services (HCBS) play an essential role. However, it is unknown whether rural-urban differences in unmet HCBS needs differ by dementia status, which is an important evidence gap to develop targeted interventions to improve HCBS access. Therefore, we evaluated associations of rural-urban continuum (RUCA classification) with consumer-reported unmet HCBS needs by dementia status.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We analyzed data from the National Core Indicators- Aging &amp; Disability survey (2016-2019; 14,645 community-dwelling consumers; age, ≥65years; 23 states) using logistic regression, comparing adjusted odds ratios (OR) of consumer-reported unmet HCBS needs across rural-urban continuum, stratified by dementia.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Findings</h3>\n \n <p>Among people living with dementia (PLWD, n = 2438), compared to metropolitan areas, prevalence of unmet HCBS needs was greater in micropolitan areas (35.4% versus 30.7% consumers; OR, 1.32, 95% CI, 0.98–1.77), small towns (36.3% consumers; OR, 1.44, 95% CI, 0.97–2.13), and rural areas (44.8% consumers; OR, 1.83, 95% CI, 1.11–3.04). These associations were reversed in those without dementia (n = 12,207). Compared with metropolitan areas, prevalence of unmet HCBS needs was lower among those in micropolitan areas (28.7% vs 31.4% consumers; OR, 0.82; 95% CI 0.72–0.93), small towns (29.3%; OR 0.85; 95% CI 0.73–1.00) and rural areas (25.4%; OR, 0.73, 95% CI, 0.58-0.90).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Among PLWD, unmet HCBS needs are significantly greater in rural areas. These findings highlight the critical need for dementia-capable HCBS in rural areas to improve equitable access to these essential services among PLWD.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50060,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rural Health","volume":"42 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jrh.70230","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rural Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jrh.70230","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Most older adults prefer aging in place, for which home- and community-based services (HCBS) play an essential role. However, it is unknown whether rural-urban differences in unmet HCBS needs differ by dementia status, which is an important evidence gap to develop targeted interventions to improve HCBS access. Therefore, we evaluated associations of rural-urban continuum (RUCA classification) with consumer-reported unmet HCBS needs by dementia status.

Methods

We analyzed data from the National Core Indicators- Aging & Disability survey (2016-2019; 14,645 community-dwelling consumers; age, ≥65years; 23 states) using logistic regression, comparing adjusted odds ratios (OR) of consumer-reported unmet HCBS needs across rural-urban continuum, stratified by dementia.

Findings

Among people living with dementia (PLWD, n = 2438), compared to metropolitan areas, prevalence of unmet HCBS needs was greater in micropolitan areas (35.4% versus 30.7% consumers; OR, 1.32, 95% CI, 0.98–1.77), small towns (36.3% consumers; OR, 1.44, 95% CI, 0.97–2.13), and rural areas (44.8% consumers; OR, 1.83, 95% CI, 1.11–3.04). These associations were reversed in those without dementia (n = 12,207). Compared with metropolitan areas, prevalence of unmet HCBS needs was lower among those in micropolitan areas (28.7% vs 31.4% consumers; OR, 0.82; 95% CI 0.72–0.93), small towns (29.3%; OR 0.85; 95% CI 0.73–1.00) and rural areas (25.4%; OR, 0.73, 95% CI, 0.58-0.90).

Conclusion

Among PLWD, unmet HCBS needs are significantly greater in rural areas. These findings highlight the critical need for dementia-capable HCBS in rural areas to improve equitable access to these essential services among PLWD.

在美国,农村地区的痴呆症患者最有可能报告在家庭和社区服务中未满足的服务需求
大多数老年人更喜欢就地养老,为此,家庭和社区服务(HCBS)发挥着至关重要的作用。然而,尚不清楚城乡之间未满足HCBS需求的差异是否因痴呆状态而异,这是制定有针对性的干预措施以改善HCBS获取的重要证据缺口。因此,我们评估了城乡连续体(RUCA分类)与消费者报告的未满足的HCBS需求与痴呆状态的关系。方法:我们使用logistic回归分析了来自国家核心指标-老龄化和残疾调查(2016-2019;14,645名社区居住消费者;年龄≥65岁;23个州)的数据,比较了消费者报告的未满足HCBS需求的调整优势比(OR),跨越城乡连续体,按痴呆分层。在痴呆症患者(PLWD, n = 2438)中,与大都市地区相比,大都市地区未满足HCBS需求的患病率更高(35.4%对30.7%的消费者;OR, 1.32, 95% CI, 0.98-1.77),小城镇(36.3%的消费者;OR, 1.44, 95% CI, 0.97-2.13),农村地区(44.8%的消费者;OR, 1.83, 95% CI, 1.11-3.04)。这些关联在没有痴呆的人群中被逆转(n = 12,207)。与大都市地区相比,小城市地区(28.7% vs 31.4%)、小城镇(29.3%;OR 0.85; 95% CI 0.73 - 1.00)和农村地区(25.4%;OR 0.73, 95% CI 0.58-0.90)未满足HCBS需求的患病率较低。结论在PLWD中,农村地区未满足的HCBS需求明显更多。这些发现突出表明,迫切需要在农村地区建立具有痴呆症能力的HCBS,以改善老年痴呆症患者公平获得这些基本服务的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Rural Health
Journal of Rural Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
6.10%
发文量
86
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Rural Health, a quarterly journal published by the NRHA, offers a variety of original research relevant and important to rural health. Some examples include evaluations, case studies, and analyses related to health status and behavior, as well as to health work force, policy and access issues. Quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods studies are welcome. Highest priority is given to manuscripts that reflect scholarly quality, demonstrate methodological rigor, and emphasize practical implications. The journal also publishes articles with an international rural health perspective, commentaries, book reviews and letters.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书