{"title":"Differential flatness in optimization-based motion planning and control","authors":"Huu-Thinh Do, Ionela Prodan, Florin Stoican, Florentina Nicolau","doi":"10.1016/j.arcontrol.2026.101080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Differential flatness has demonstrated numerous advantages and diverse applications in motion planning and control and while traditionally associated with robotic and mechanical systems, its applicability extends beyond these domains. By employing a change in the coordinate system, differential flatness transforms complex, nonlinear system dynamics into a linear representation. In essence, it provides a model inversion strategy that proves particularly useful for solving problems related to optimal trajectory generation and tracking under various constraints.</div><div>This work offers an overview of past and current advancements in optimization-based motion planning problems that employ differential flatness. To the best of our knowledge, no prior review has been conducted from this perspective. We begin with an in-depth analysis of the foundational principles of flatness, examining its key properties and its intrinsic connection to feedback linearization. Particular emphasis is placed on the available choices for flat parameterization, which facilitate the characterization of costs and constraints in optimization problems. Furthermore, we explore tools for curve parameterization, which are essential for addressing trajectory generation problems involving constraints such as saturation limits, collision avoidance or obstacle navigation. Our review is structured around the general framework of motion planning, which comprises three main components: guidance, control, and adaptation. For each of these components, we analyze and synthesize the use of differential flatness.</div><div>Rather than aiming for an exhaustive catalog or focusing narrowly on specific applications, this review seeks to highlight the benefits of differential flatness and aims to inspire new research directions in motion planning and control.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50750,"journal":{"name":"Annual Reviews in Control","volume":"62 ","pages":"Article 101080"},"PeriodicalIF":14.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annual Reviews in Control","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1367578826000362","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/10/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Differential flatness has demonstrated numerous advantages and diverse applications in motion planning and control and while traditionally associated with robotic and mechanical systems, its applicability extends beyond these domains. By employing a change in the coordinate system, differential flatness transforms complex, nonlinear system dynamics into a linear representation. In essence, it provides a model inversion strategy that proves particularly useful for solving problems related to optimal trajectory generation and tracking under various constraints.
This work offers an overview of past and current advancements in optimization-based motion planning problems that employ differential flatness. To the best of our knowledge, no prior review has been conducted from this perspective. We begin with an in-depth analysis of the foundational principles of flatness, examining its key properties and its intrinsic connection to feedback linearization. Particular emphasis is placed on the available choices for flat parameterization, which facilitate the characterization of costs and constraints in optimization problems. Furthermore, we explore tools for curve parameterization, which are essential for addressing trajectory generation problems involving constraints such as saturation limits, collision avoidance or obstacle navigation. Our review is structured around the general framework of motion planning, which comprises three main components: guidance, control, and adaptation. For each of these components, we analyze and synthesize the use of differential flatness.
Rather than aiming for an exhaustive catalog or focusing narrowly on specific applications, this review seeks to highlight the benefits of differential flatness and aims to inspire new research directions in motion planning and control.
期刊介绍:
The field of Control is changing very fast now with technology-driven “societal grand challenges” and with the deployment of new digital technologies. The aim of Annual Reviews in Control is to provide comprehensive and visionary views of the field of Control, by publishing the following types of review articles:
Survey Article: Review papers on main methodologies or technical advances adding considerable technical value to the state of the art. Note that papers which purely rely on mechanistic searches and lack comprehensive analysis providing a clear contribution to the field will be rejected.
Vision Article: Cutting-edge and emerging topics with visionary perspective on the future of the field or how it will bridge multiple disciplines, and
Tutorial research Article: Fundamental guides for future studies.