Mapping International Lung Cancer Screening Quality Indicators to the American College of Radiology Lung Cancer Screening Registry: A Crosswalk Analysis.

Gavin Stoel, Ella A Kazerooni, Charles S White, Shawn D Teague, Kyle Edwards, Judy Burleson, Kristin C Frisby, Madison Wulfeck, Dhiraj Baruah, Lauren K Groner
{"title":"Mapping International Lung Cancer Screening Quality Indicators to the American College of Radiology Lung Cancer Screening Registry: A Crosswalk Analysis.","authors":"Gavin Stoel, Ella A Kazerooni, Charles S White, Shawn D Teague, Kyle Edwards, Judy Burleson, Kristin C Frisby, Madison Wulfeck, Dhiraj Baruah, Lauren K Groner","doi":"10.1016/j.jacr.2026.10.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC) established 26 consensus quality indicators (QIs) for lung cancer screening (LCS) programs, of which 20 were rated as essential and 6 as desirable by the expert panel. We evaluated the extent to which the American College of Radiology (ACR) Lung Cancer Screening Registry (LCSR), the largest LCS registry in the U.S., can support measurement of the IASLC QIs. We performed a crosswalk analysis, mapping all 26 IASLC QIs to the LCSR Data Dictionary and its 46 clinical performance measures, classifying each as directly measurable, derivable, or not measurable. The crosswalk was reviewed and independently validated by members of the ACR Early Lung Cancer Detection Registry Quality and Education Committee. Eight QIs (30.8%) were directly measurable, 10 (38.5%) were derivable, and 8 (30.8%) were not measurable from LCSR data alone. The LCSR therefore contains sufficient data elements to support measurement of approximately 69% of IASLC QIs. Remaining gaps involve screening uptake, clinical investigation, procedure complications, curative-intent treatment, treatment equity, diagnostic investigation equity and selected wait-time measures and would require additional registry fields or external data linkage.</p>","PeriodicalId":73968,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2026.10.017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC) established 26 consensus quality indicators (QIs) for lung cancer screening (LCS) programs, of which 20 were rated as essential and 6 as desirable by the expert panel. We evaluated the extent to which the American College of Radiology (ACR) Lung Cancer Screening Registry (LCSR), the largest LCS registry in the U.S., can support measurement of the IASLC QIs. We performed a crosswalk analysis, mapping all 26 IASLC QIs to the LCSR Data Dictionary and its 46 clinical performance measures, classifying each as directly measurable, derivable, or not measurable. The crosswalk was reviewed and independently validated by members of the ACR Early Lung Cancer Detection Registry Quality and Education Committee. Eight QIs (30.8%) were directly measurable, 10 (38.5%) were derivable, and 8 (30.8%) were not measurable from LCSR data alone. The LCSR therefore contains sufficient data elements to support measurement of approximately 69% of IASLC QIs. Remaining gaps involve screening uptake, clinical investigation, procedure complications, curative-intent treatment, treatment equity, diagnostic investigation equity and selected wait-time measures and would require additional registry fields or external data linkage.

将国际肺癌筛查质量指标映射到美国放射学会肺癌筛查注册表:一项交叉分析。
国际肺癌研究协会(IASLC)为肺癌筛查(LCS)项目建立了26个共识质量指标(QIs),其中20个被专家小组评为必不可少,6个被评为可取。我们评估了美国放射学会(ACR)肺癌筛查登记处(LCSR),美国最大的LCS登记处,在多大程度上支持IASLC质量指标的测量。我们进行了人行横道分析,将所有26个IASLC质量指标映射到LCSR数据词典及其46个临床表现指标,将每个指标分为直接可测量、可衍生或不可测量。该人行横道由ACR早期肺癌检测登记质量和教育委员会的成员进行了审查和独立验证。8个QIs(30.8%)可直接测量,10个QIs(38.5%)可推导,8个QIs(30.8%)不能单独从LCSR数据测量。因此,LCSR包含足够的数据元素,以支持IASLC约69%的质量指标的测量。剩下的差距涉及筛查、临床调查、手术并发症、治疗意向治疗、治疗公平性、诊断调查公平性和选定的等待时间措施,需要额外的登记字段或外部数据链接。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书