Rod Geometry and Material Characteristics as Risk Factors for Rod Breakage After Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: A Multicenter Cohort Study with Five-Year Follow-up.

IF 5.1 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Alice Baroncini, Daniel Larrieu, Louis Boissiere, Cecile Roscop, Ferran Pellisé, Ahmet Alanay, Frank Kleinstueck, Javier Pizones, Yann Philippe Charles, Anouar Bourghli, Ibrahim Obeid
{"title":"Rod Geometry and Material Characteristics as Risk Factors for Rod Breakage After Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: A Multicenter Cohort Study with Five-Year Follow-up.","authors":"Alice Baroncini, Daniel Larrieu, Louis Boissiere, Cecile Roscop, Ferran Pellisé, Ahmet Alanay, Frank Kleinstueck, Javier Pizones, Yann Philippe Charles, Anouar Bourghli, Ibrahim Obeid","doi":"10.1016/j.spinee.2026.10.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background Context Rod breakage is a frequent and clinically important late complication after adult spine deformity (ASD) surgery, yet most research has focused on patient and alignment factors rather than implant geometry. Purpose This study aimed to investigate the rod-related characteristics independently associated with rod breakage following ASD surgery, with particular focus on quantitative measures of rod material, rod shape and its postoperative evolution. Design Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected, six-center data. Patient Sample ASD patients, who underwent long posterior fusion to the pelvis with available serial full-length lateral radiographs at 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years were included; patients with multiple-rod constructs were excluded. Minimum two-year follow-up. Outcome Measures Rod breakage (defined radiographically), time to rod breakage, and discrimination performance of a multivariable predictive model based on patient and rod characteristics. Methods Rod curvature was quantified at L1-S1 and L4-S1 and the maximum positive increase in L1-S1 curvature between consecutive postoperative timepoints was derived. Time-to-breakage was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards models, with data-driven thresholds defining high-risk geometry. Model discrimination was assessed using the concordance index. Results Eighty-three patients (mean follow-up 60.0 ± 23.0 months) were analyzed; 30 developed rod breakage at a mean 41.7 ± 22.2 months. L4-S1 rod curvature ≥33° at 6 weeks was associated with higher risk of breakage (HR 2.25; 95% CI 1.06-4.77; p = 0.036), as was a maximum L1-S1 curvature increase≤4° (HR 3.33; 95% CI 1.25-8.84; p = 0.016). Titanium rods had lower risk compared with cobalt-chromium (HR for titanium 0.50; p = 0.02), and diameter >5.5 mm was associated with increased risk (HR 1.90; p = 0.02). A multivariable patient-level model incorporating rod geometry showed improved discrimination (C-index 0.74). Conclusions Specific rod geometry characteristics-particularly early lower lumbar curvature and limited postoperative curvature increase-were independently associated with rod breakage after ASD surgery. Integrating rod shape into risk models may support implant selection, surgical planning, and postoperative monitoring. Level of Evidence Level III, retrospective cohort study.</p>","PeriodicalId":49484,"journal":{"name":"Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2026.10.004","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Context Rod breakage is a frequent and clinically important late complication after adult spine deformity (ASD) surgery, yet most research has focused on patient and alignment factors rather than implant geometry. Purpose This study aimed to investigate the rod-related characteristics independently associated with rod breakage following ASD surgery, with particular focus on quantitative measures of rod material, rod shape and its postoperative evolution. Design Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected, six-center data. Patient Sample ASD patients, who underwent long posterior fusion to the pelvis with available serial full-length lateral radiographs at 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years were included; patients with multiple-rod constructs were excluded. Minimum two-year follow-up. Outcome Measures Rod breakage (defined radiographically), time to rod breakage, and discrimination performance of a multivariable predictive model based on patient and rod characteristics. Methods Rod curvature was quantified at L1-S1 and L4-S1 and the maximum positive increase in L1-S1 curvature between consecutive postoperative timepoints was derived. Time-to-breakage was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards models, with data-driven thresholds defining high-risk geometry. Model discrimination was assessed using the concordance index. Results Eighty-three patients (mean follow-up 60.0 ± 23.0 months) were analyzed; 30 developed rod breakage at a mean 41.7 ± 22.2 months. L4-S1 rod curvature ≥33° at 6 weeks was associated with higher risk of breakage (HR 2.25; 95% CI 1.06-4.77; p = 0.036), as was a maximum L1-S1 curvature increase≤4° (HR 3.33; 95% CI 1.25-8.84; p = 0.016). Titanium rods had lower risk compared with cobalt-chromium (HR for titanium 0.50; p = 0.02), and diameter >5.5 mm was associated with increased risk (HR 1.90; p = 0.02). A multivariable patient-level model incorporating rod geometry showed improved discrimination (C-index 0.74). Conclusions Specific rod geometry characteristics-particularly early lower lumbar curvature and limited postoperative curvature increase-were independently associated with rod breakage after ASD surgery. Integrating rod shape into risk models may support implant selection, surgical planning, and postoperative monitoring. Level of Evidence Level III, retrospective cohort study.

成人脊柱畸形手术后棒的几何形状和材料特征是棒断裂的危险因素:一项5年随访的多中心队列研究。
脊柱杆断裂是成人脊柱畸形(ASD)手术后常见且临床上重要的晚期并发症,但大多数研究都集中在患者和对齐因素上,而不是植入物的几何形状。本研究旨在探讨与ASD术后棒断相关的独立棒相关特征,特别关注棒材料、棒形状及其术后演变的定量测量。设计回顾性分析前瞻性收集的六中心数据。患者样本包括在6周、6个月、1年和2年接受骨盆后路长融合的ASD患者,并提供系列全长侧位片;排除多棒结构的患者。至少两年的随访。结果测量棒断裂(影像学定义)、到棒断裂的时间,以及基于患者和棒特征的多变量预测模型的判别性能。方法量化L1-S1和L4-S1的棒曲率,推导出术后连续时间点L1-S1曲率的最大正增加。使用Kaplan-Meier和Cox比例风险模型分析断裂时间,并使用数据驱动的阈值定义高风险几何形状。使用一致性指数评估模型歧视。结果分析83例患者,平均随访60.0±23.0个月;30例患者在平均41.7±22.2个月出现杆状物断裂。6周时L4-S1棒曲率≥33°与较高的断裂风险相关(HR 2.25; 95% CI 1.06-4.77; p = 0.036),最大L1-S1曲率增加≤4°也是如此(HR 3.33; 95% CI 1.25-8.84; p = 0.016)。钛棒与钴铬棒相比风险较低(钛的风险比0.50,p = 0.02),直径>5.5 mm与风险增加相关(风险比1.90,p = 0.02)。纳入棒状结构的多变量患者水平模型显示出更好的辨别能力(c指数0.74)。结论:特定的杆几何特征——尤其是早期下腰椎弯曲和术后有限的弯曲增加——与ASD手术后杆断裂独立相关。将棒的形状整合到风险模型中可以支持植入物的选择、手术计划和术后监测。证据水平III级,回顾性队列研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Spine Journal
Spine Journal 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
680
审稿时长
13.1 weeks
期刊介绍: The Spine Journal, the official journal of the North American Spine Society, is an international and multidisciplinary journal that publishes original, peer-reviewed articles on research and treatment related to the spine and spine care, including basic science and clinical investigations. It is a condition of publication that manuscripts submitted to The Spine Journal have not been published, and will not be simultaneously submitted or published elsewhere. The Spine Journal also publishes major reviews of specific topics by acknowledged authorities, technical notes, teaching editorials, and other special features, Letters to the Editor-in-Chief are encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书