Efficacy of whole-body vibration training in the management of patients with COPD: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Cinthia J Oliveira, Iura Gonzalez N Alves
{"title":"Efficacy of whole-body vibration training in the management of patients with COPD: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Cinthia J Oliveira, Iura Gonzalez N Alves","doi":"10.1016/j.bjpt.2026.101674","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) often presents with skeletal muscle dysfunction, which worsens prognosis. Whole-body vibration training (WBVT) has been proposed as an adjunct to pulmonary rehabilitation, but evidence of its clinical efficacy remains inconsistent.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the effects of WBVT on functional capacity, muscle strength, pulmonary function, and quality of life in individuals with COPD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following PRISMA guidelines and registered in PROSPERO. Only randomized controlled trials were included. Outcomes assessed included 6-minute walk distance (6MWD), five-repetition sit-to-stand test (5STS), pulmonary function, and quality of life.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifteen RCTs met the inclusion criteria. WBVT significantly improved functional capacity measured by the 6MWD (MD = 34.35 m; 95% CI: 13.67,55.04; GRADE: very low). Subgroup analysis revealed a clinically meaningful improvement compared with usual care (MD = 75.97 m; 95% CI: 58.65,93.30), but not when compared with active exercise interventions. For the 5STS, a clinically relevant gain was observed versus usual care (MD = -5.95 seconds; 95% CI: -10.76, -1.14), with no significant difference compared to conventional exercise. No statistically significant effects were found for FEV₁ or quality of life. Most trials presented high risk of bias, and evidence certainty ranged from low to very low.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>WBVT may offer benefits in walking distance and sit-to-stand performance only when compared with no rehabilitation exposure, a scenario that is unrealistic in contemporary clinical practice given the strong evidence supporting structured exercise-based pulmonary rehabilitation for COPD management.</p>","PeriodicalId":49621,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy","volume":"31 1","pages":"101674"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjpt.2026.101674","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) often presents with skeletal muscle dysfunction, which worsens prognosis. Whole-body vibration training (WBVT) has been proposed as an adjunct to pulmonary rehabilitation, but evidence of its clinical efficacy remains inconsistent.

Objective: To evaluate the effects of WBVT on functional capacity, muscle strength, pulmonary function, and quality of life in individuals with COPD.

Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following PRISMA guidelines and registered in PROSPERO. Only randomized controlled trials were included. Outcomes assessed included 6-minute walk distance (6MWD), five-repetition sit-to-stand test (5STS), pulmonary function, and quality of life.

Results: Fifteen RCTs met the inclusion criteria. WBVT significantly improved functional capacity measured by the 6MWD (MD = 34.35 m; 95% CI: 13.67,55.04; GRADE: very low). Subgroup analysis revealed a clinically meaningful improvement compared with usual care (MD = 75.97 m; 95% CI: 58.65,93.30), but not when compared with active exercise interventions. For the 5STS, a clinically relevant gain was observed versus usual care (MD = -5.95 seconds; 95% CI: -10.76, -1.14), with no significant difference compared to conventional exercise. No statistically significant effects were found for FEV₁ or quality of life. Most trials presented high risk of bias, and evidence certainty ranged from low to very low.

Conclusion: WBVT may offer benefits in walking distance and sit-to-stand performance only when compared with no rehabilitation exposure, a scenario that is unrealistic in contemporary clinical practice given the strong evidence supporting structured exercise-based pulmonary rehabilitation for COPD management.

全身振动训练在慢性阻塞性肺病患者管理中的疗效:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)常表现为骨骼肌功能障碍,其预后恶化。全身振动训练(WBVT)已被提出作为肺部康复的辅助手段,但其临床疗效的证据仍不一致。目的:评价WBVT对COPD患者功能能力、肌力、肺功能和生活质量的影响。方法:按照PRISMA指南进行系统评价和荟萃分析,并在PROSPERO注册。仅纳入随机对照试验。评估的结果包括6分钟步行距离(6MWD)、5次重复坐立测试(5STS)、肺功能和生活质量。结果:15项rct符合纳入标准。WBVT显著改善6MWD测量的功能能力(MD = 34.35 m; 95% CI: 13.67,55.04; GRADE:非常低)。亚组分析显示,与常规护理相比有临床意义的改善(MD = 75.97 m; 95% CI: 58.65,93.30),但与积极运动干预相比没有改善。对于5STS,与常规护理相比,观察到临床相关的增益(MD = -5.95秒;95% CI: -10.76, -1.14),与常规运动相比无显著差异。对FEV 1或生活质量没有统计学上显著的影响。大多数试验存在高偏倚风险,证据确定性从低到极低不等。结论:与无康复暴露相比,WBVT可能在步行距离和坐立表现方面有好处,鉴于有强有力的证据支持基于结构化运动的肺康复治疗COPD,在当代临床实践中,这种情况是不现实的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
8.80%
发文量
53
审稿时长
74 days
期刊介绍: The Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy (BJPT) is the official publication of the Brazilian Society of Physical Therapy Research and Graduate Studies (ABRAPG-Ft). It publishes original research articles on topics related to the areas of physical therapy and rehabilitation sciences, including clinical, basic or applied studies on the assessment, prevention, and treatment of movement disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书