Open Surgical Repair of Proximal Hamstring Tears Results in High Rates of Hamstring Strength Recovery and Return to Preinjury Activity.

Q3 Medicine
Mohammad Mesfer Alzahrani, Brendon Swift, Zaid A Alzaid, Abdulhamid Alyousef, Michael Pickell, Geoffrey P Wilkin, Steven R Papp, Allan S Liew
{"title":"Open Surgical Repair of Proximal Hamstring Tears Results in High Rates of Hamstring Strength Recovery and Return to Preinjury Activity.","authors":"Mohammad Mesfer Alzahrani, Brendon Swift, Zaid A Alzaid, Abdulhamid Alyousef, Michael Pickell, Geoffrey P Wilkin, Steven R Papp, Allan S Liew","doi":"10.1002/ars2.70150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the clinical and patient-reported outcomes after open operative management of proximal hamstring ruptures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective chart review was completed for patients who underwent open surgical repair of a proximal hamstring rupture at a single academic center (The Ottawa Hospital) with a minimum of 1-year follow-up between June 2017 and August 2022. Demographic, injury, and surgical data were collected. Patient-reported outcomes, including the Lower Extremity Function Score and International Hip Outcome Tool, at final follow-up were collected and analyzed for all patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 41 patients (58.5% men) with a mean age of 49.5 ± 11.7 years (range: 20-70 years old) with a mean follow-up of 46.8 ± 17.6 months (range 13-74 months) were included in the study. The most common mechanism of injury (31.7%) was a fall while skating or skiing. A 3-tendon injury was the most common pattern (82.9%), with the majority being retracted at least 6 cm (51.2%). Postoperative complications were observed in 12.2% of patients and included sensory nerve injury, repair failure, and postoperative admission for intractable pain. Most patients regained full hamstring strength (87.8%) and returned to preinjury activity levels (70.7%), with a mean follow-up of 46.8 months. Patient-reported outcomes at final follow-up were excellent, as 87.8% of the patients scored >90 on Lower Extremity Function Score and 82.9% scored >90 on International Hip Outcome Tool.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this study, patients who underwent open surgical repair of proximal hamstring tendon avulsion had high rates of hamstring strength recovery and return to preinjury activity, with favorable patient-reported outcomes and low complication rates.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level IV, therapeutic retrospective study.</p>","PeriodicalId":34631,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"e70150"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13685577/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ars2.70150","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the clinical and patient-reported outcomes after open operative management of proximal hamstring ruptures.

Methods: Retrospective chart review was completed for patients who underwent open surgical repair of a proximal hamstring rupture at a single academic center (The Ottawa Hospital) with a minimum of 1-year follow-up between June 2017 and August 2022. Demographic, injury, and surgical data were collected. Patient-reported outcomes, including the Lower Extremity Function Score and International Hip Outcome Tool, at final follow-up were collected and analyzed for all patients.

Results: A total of 41 patients (58.5% men) with a mean age of 49.5 ± 11.7 years (range: 20-70 years old) with a mean follow-up of 46.8 ± 17.6 months (range 13-74 months) were included in the study. The most common mechanism of injury (31.7%) was a fall while skating or skiing. A 3-tendon injury was the most common pattern (82.9%), with the majority being retracted at least 6 cm (51.2%). Postoperative complications were observed in 12.2% of patients and included sensory nerve injury, repair failure, and postoperative admission for intractable pain. Most patients regained full hamstring strength (87.8%) and returned to preinjury activity levels (70.7%), with a mean follow-up of 46.8 months. Patient-reported outcomes at final follow-up were excellent, as 87.8% of the patients scored >90 on Lower Extremity Function Score and 82.9% scored >90 on International Hip Outcome Tool.

Conclusions: In this study, patients who underwent open surgical repair of proximal hamstring tendon avulsion had high rates of hamstring strength recovery and return to preinjury activity, with favorable patient-reported outcomes and low complication rates.

Level of evidence: Level IV, therapeutic retrospective study.

开放手术修复近端腘绳肌撕裂导致高比率的腘绳肌力量恢复和恢复损伤前的活动。
目的:评价开放手术治疗近端腘绳肌断裂的临床和患者报告的结果。方法:回顾性分析2017年6月至2022年8月在渥太华医院(The Ottawa Hospital)接受开放手术修复腘绳肌腱近端断裂的患者,随访时间至少1年。收集了人口统计、损伤和手术数据。收集并分析所有患者在最终随访时报告的结果,包括下肢功能评分和国际髋关节预后工具。结果:共纳入41例患者,其中男性占58.5%,平均年龄49.5±11.7岁(范围:20 ~ 70岁),平均随访时间46.8±17.6个月(范围:13 ~ 74个月)。最常见的损伤机制(31.7%)是滑冰或滑雪时摔倒。3肌腱损伤是最常见的类型(82.9%),其中大多数至少缩回6cm(51.2%)。12.2%的患者出现术后并发症,包括感觉神经损伤、修复失败和术后因难治性疼痛入院。大多数患者恢复了完全的腘绳肌力量(87.8%),恢复到损伤前的活动水平(70.7%),平均随访46.8个月。患者报告的最终随访结果非常好,87.8%的患者下肢功能评分为>90分,82.9%的患者国际髋关节预后工具评分为>90分。结论:在本研究中,接受开放手术修复近端腘绳肌腱撕脱伤的患者腘绳肌腱力量恢复率高,恢复损伤前活动,患者报告的结果良好,并发症发生率低。证据等级:IV级,治疗性回顾性研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
218
审稿时长
45 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书