Situational Analysis of Cancer Care Services in India: Protocol for a Nationwide Cross-Sectional Health Systems Study.

IF 1.6 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Anita Nath, Abhishek David George, Sudarshan K L, Krishnan Sathishkumar, Thilagavathi Ramamoorthy, Bency Joseph, Gokul Sarveswaran, Prashant Mathur
{"title":"Situational Analysis of Cancer Care Services in India: Protocol for a Nationwide Cross-Sectional Health Systems Study.","authors":"Anita Nath, Abhishek David George, Sudarshan K L, Krishnan Sathishkumar, Thilagavathi Ramamoorthy, Bency Joseph, Gokul Sarveswaran, Prashant Mathur","doi":"10.2196/99765","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cancer is a significant public health challenge in India, contributing to 8.3% of deaths and 5.0% of disability-adjusted life years in 2016-nearly twice its contribution in 1990. Fragmented service delivery, limited specialist availability, late presentation, and significant financial hardship continue to hinder access to timely and effective cancer care, particularly in rural and underserved regions. A comprehensive, system-level assessment is essential to inform evidence-based planning and strengthen cancer services nationwide.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to assess the availability, readiness, accessibility, and quality of cancer care services across primary, secondary, and tertiary health care facilities in India. Specifically, it will evaluate infrastructure, human resources, diagnostic and treatment capacity, referral pathways, and service delivery across the 6 Institute of Medicine quality domains (equitable, effective, patient-centered, safe, efficient, and timely); compare rural-urban and public-private disparities; and use these findings to develop an evidence-informed framework for strengthening cancer care services and informing national policy and program planning.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 3-year cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted across 31 states and union territories using proportionate district sampling based on rural-urban population distribution. Nodal hospitals coordinated data collection from primary, secondary, and tertiary health care facilities. Facility-level data were collected using 3 standardized electronic forms-developed separately for primary, secondary, and tertiary levels of care-covering infrastructure, workforce, diagnostic and treatment services, referral systems, and service. Descriptive statistics will be used to summarize service availability and readiness, and chi-square tests to compare rural-urban, public-private, and facility-level differences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study received funding in October 2023. Facility-level data collection took place between July 2024 and March 2026. We enrolled 6896 health facilities (4353 primary, 1979 secondary, and 564 tertiary) from 352 districts across 31 states and union territories, with participation rates of 64.6% (4353/6735) for primary health centers, 75.7% (1979/2612) for secondary-level facilities, and 63.9% (564/902) for tertiary hospitals. Data cleaning and quality checks are complete, and analysis is complete but unpublished; we will report results on service availability, readiness, and regional variation separately.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This nationwide assessment is expected to provide one of the most comprehensive evaluations of cancer care preparedness undertaken in India. Findings are anticipated to inform national policy and program planning, including investment priorities under the NP-NCD, Ayushman Bharat, and related initiatives to support progress toward equitable, comprehensive cancer care and universal health coverage.</p>","PeriodicalId":14755,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Research Protocols","volume":"15 ","pages":"e99765"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13686612/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Research Protocols","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/99765","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cancer is a significant public health challenge in India, contributing to 8.3% of deaths and 5.0% of disability-adjusted life years in 2016-nearly twice its contribution in 1990. Fragmented service delivery, limited specialist availability, late presentation, and significant financial hardship continue to hinder access to timely and effective cancer care, particularly in rural and underserved regions. A comprehensive, system-level assessment is essential to inform evidence-based planning and strengthen cancer services nationwide.

Objective: This study aims to assess the availability, readiness, accessibility, and quality of cancer care services across primary, secondary, and tertiary health care facilities in India. Specifically, it will evaluate infrastructure, human resources, diagnostic and treatment capacity, referral pathways, and service delivery across the 6 Institute of Medicine quality domains (equitable, effective, patient-centered, safe, efficient, and timely); compare rural-urban and public-private disparities; and use these findings to develop an evidence-informed framework for strengthening cancer care services and informing national policy and program planning.

Methods: A 3-year cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted across 31 states and union territories using proportionate district sampling based on rural-urban population distribution. Nodal hospitals coordinated data collection from primary, secondary, and tertiary health care facilities. Facility-level data were collected using 3 standardized electronic forms-developed separately for primary, secondary, and tertiary levels of care-covering infrastructure, workforce, diagnostic and treatment services, referral systems, and service. Descriptive statistics will be used to summarize service availability and readiness, and chi-square tests to compare rural-urban, public-private, and facility-level differences.

Results: The study received funding in October 2023. Facility-level data collection took place between July 2024 and March 2026. We enrolled 6896 health facilities (4353 primary, 1979 secondary, and 564 tertiary) from 352 districts across 31 states and union territories, with participation rates of 64.6% (4353/6735) for primary health centers, 75.7% (1979/2612) for secondary-level facilities, and 63.9% (564/902) for tertiary hospitals. Data cleaning and quality checks are complete, and analysis is complete but unpublished; we will report results on service availability, readiness, and regional variation separately.

Conclusions: This nationwide assessment is expected to provide one of the most comprehensive evaluations of cancer care preparedness undertaken in India. Findings are anticipated to inform national policy and program planning, including investment priorities under the NP-NCD, Ayushman Bharat, and related initiatives to support progress toward equitable, comprehensive cancer care and universal health coverage.

印度癌症护理服务的情境分析:全国横向卫生系统研究方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
414
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书