When Food Safety Goes Viral: The Influence of the Documentary Poisoned on Trust in Food Supply Chain Actors and Food Risk Perceptions Among Young Adult College Students in Indiana.

IF 4.1 2区 农林科学 Q2 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Fanny Gozzi, Shams Adigozalzade, Yaohua Feng
{"title":"When Food Safety Goes Viral: The Influence of the Documentary Poisoned on Trust in Food Supply Chain Actors and Food Risk Perceptions Among Young Adult College Students in Indiana.","authors":"Fanny Gozzi, Shams Adigozalzade, Yaohua Feng","doi":"10.1111/1750-3841.71589","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As foodborne illnesses pose a significant public health concern in the United States, the rise of streaming platforms broadens audiences' exposure to food safety documentary films. This investigation examines how the documentary Poisoned: The Dirty Truth About Your Food shapes young adults' perceptions, attitudes, and trust in the food supply chain among undergraduate students at one university in Indiana enrolled in food science (Study 1, n = 19) and nonfood science programs (Study 2, n = 59). An explanatory mixed-methods design combined surveys at three time points with a focus group discussion. Surveys assessed perceptions of food safety importance and confidence in food supply actors using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, while focus group transcripts were analyzed thematically. Participants reported strong emotional responses, including fear, frustration, and distrust toward the food industry and regulatory bodies, while describing the documentary as informative and effective in raising awareness about foodborne illness risks and the importance of food safety practices. Differences emerged by educational background, with food science majors demonstrating more critical engagement, whereas some nonfood science participants reported intentions to adopt risky food-handling practices, such as washing raw poultry. Confidence in food supply chain actors declined significantly after viewing. At 9-day follow-up, food science students regained trust, while nonfood science students showed recovery only toward consumer-facing actors and food they prepared themselves. These findings suggest that emotionally compelling documentaries can increase food safety awareness and engagement while reducing trust and unintentionally reinforcing unsafe practices. Rather than serving as educational tools, such documentaries offer valuable lessons for improving transparent, accurate, and balanced food safety communication. PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS: This research offers food industry, government agencies, educators, and media creators with insight into how the documentary Poisoned can influence young adults' in college perceptions and responses to food safety issues. Since documentaries are widely available and can reach broad audiences, findings highlight the importance of proactive, transparent, and collaborative communication, helping audience understand how the food system works, how food safety hazards are addressed, and what can be done in the kitchen to reduce risks. Cross-sector collaboration that combines engaging storytelling with reliable educational content may improve public understanding, strengthen confidence in the food system, and encourage safer food-handling practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":193,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Food Science","volume":"91 10","pages":"e71589"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13686119/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Food Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1750-3841.71589","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As foodborne illnesses pose a significant public health concern in the United States, the rise of streaming platforms broadens audiences' exposure to food safety documentary films. This investigation examines how the documentary Poisoned: The Dirty Truth About Your Food shapes young adults' perceptions, attitudes, and trust in the food supply chain among undergraduate students at one university in Indiana enrolled in food science (Study 1, n = 19) and nonfood science programs (Study 2, n = 59). An explanatory mixed-methods design combined surveys at three time points with a focus group discussion. Surveys assessed perceptions of food safety importance and confidence in food supply actors using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, while focus group transcripts were analyzed thematically. Participants reported strong emotional responses, including fear, frustration, and distrust toward the food industry and regulatory bodies, while describing the documentary as informative and effective in raising awareness about foodborne illness risks and the importance of food safety practices. Differences emerged by educational background, with food science majors demonstrating more critical engagement, whereas some nonfood science participants reported intentions to adopt risky food-handling practices, such as washing raw poultry. Confidence in food supply chain actors declined significantly after viewing. At 9-day follow-up, food science students regained trust, while nonfood science students showed recovery only toward consumer-facing actors and food they prepared themselves. These findings suggest that emotionally compelling documentaries can increase food safety awareness and engagement while reducing trust and unintentionally reinforcing unsafe practices. Rather than serving as educational tools, such documentaries offer valuable lessons for improving transparent, accurate, and balanced food safety communication. PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS: This research offers food industry, government agencies, educators, and media creators with insight into how the documentary Poisoned can influence young adults' in college perceptions and responses to food safety issues. Since documentaries are widely available and can reach broad audiences, findings highlight the importance of proactive, transparent, and collaborative communication, helping audience understand how the food system works, how food safety hazards are addressed, and what can be done in the kitchen to reduce risks. Cross-sector collaboration that combines engaging storytelling with reliable educational content may improve public understanding, strengthen confidence in the food system, and encourage safer food-handling practices.

当食品安全病毒:纪录片中毒对食品供应链参与者的信任和食品风险认知在印第安纳州的年轻成年大学生的影响。
由于食源性疾病在美国构成了一个重大的公共卫生问题,流媒体平台的兴起扩大了观众对食品安全纪录片的接触。本调查考察了纪录片《中毒:你的食物的肮脏真相》如何影响印第安纳州一所大学就读食品科学(研究1,n = 19)和非食品科学(研究2,n = 59)的本科生对食品供应链的看法、态度和信任。解释性混合方法设计将三个时间点的调查与焦点小组讨论相结合。调查评估了食品安全的重要性和对食品供应行为者的信心的看法,使用Wilcoxon签名秩测试,而焦点小组的成绩单进行了主题分析。参与者报告了强烈的情绪反应,包括对食品行业和监管机构的恐惧、沮丧和不信任,同时称这部纪录片在提高对食源性疾病风险和食品安全做法重要性的认识方面提供了丰富的信息并有效。教育背景也存在差异,食品科学专业的学生表现出更多的批判性参与,而一些非食品科学专业的参与者报告说,他们倾向于采用有风险的食品处理方法,比如清洗生家禽。观看后,对食品供应链参与者的信心明显下降。在9天的随访中,食品科学专业的学生重新获得了信任,而非食品科学专业的学生只对面向消费者的演员和他们自己准备的食物表现出信任。这些发现表明,情感上引人注目的纪录片可以提高食品安全意识和参与度,同时减少信任并无意中强化不安全做法。这些纪录片不是作为教育工具,而是为提高透明、准确和平衡的食品安全传播提供了宝贵的经验。实际应用:本研究为食品行业、政府机构、教育工作者和媒体创作者提供了关于纪录片《中毒》如何影响大学生对食品安全问题的看法和反应的见解。由于纪录片可以广泛获取,可以接触到广泛的观众,因此研究结果强调了主动、透明和协作沟通的重要性,帮助观众了解食品系统如何运作,如何解决食品安全危害,以及在厨房可以做些什么来降低风险。将引人入胜的故事讲述与可靠的教育内容相结合的跨部门合作可以提高公众的理解,增强对食品系统的信心,并鼓励更安全的食品处理做法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Food Science
Journal of Food Science 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
2.60%
发文量
412
审稿时长
3.1 months
期刊介绍: The goal of the Journal of Food Science is to offer scientists, researchers, and other food professionals the opportunity to share knowledge of scientific advancements in the myriad disciplines affecting their work, through a respected peer-reviewed publication. The Journal of Food Science serves as an international forum for vital research and developments in food science. The range of topics covered in the journal include: -Concise Reviews and Hypotheses in Food Science -New Horizons in Food Research -Integrated Food Science -Food Chemistry -Food Engineering, Materials Science, and Nanotechnology -Food Microbiology and Safety -Sensory and Consumer Sciences -Health, Nutrition, and Food -Toxicology and Chemical Food Safety The Journal of Food Science publishes peer-reviewed articles that cover all aspects of food science, including safety and nutrition. Reviews should be 15 to 50 typewritten pages (including tables, figures, and references), should provide in-depth coverage of a narrowly defined topic, and should embody careful evaluation (weaknesses, strengths, explanation of discrepancies in results among similar studies) of all pertinent studies, so that insightful interpretations and conclusions can be presented. Hypothesis papers are especially appropriate in pioneering areas of research or important areas that are afflicted by scientific controversy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书