When Food Safety Goes Viral: The Influence of the Documentary Poisoned on Trust in Food Supply Chain Actors and Food Risk Perceptions Among Young Adult College Students in Indiana.
{"title":"When Food Safety Goes Viral: The Influence of the Documentary Poisoned on Trust in Food Supply Chain Actors and Food Risk Perceptions Among Young Adult College Students in Indiana.","authors":"Fanny Gozzi, Shams Adigozalzade, Yaohua Feng","doi":"10.1111/1750-3841.71589","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As foodborne illnesses pose a significant public health concern in the United States, the rise of streaming platforms broadens audiences' exposure to food safety documentary films. This investigation examines how the documentary Poisoned: The Dirty Truth About Your Food shapes young adults' perceptions, attitudes, and trust in the food supply chain among undergraduate students at one university in Indiana enrolled in food science (Study 1, n = 19) and nonfood science programs (Study 2, n = 59). An explanatory mixed-methods design combined surveys at three time points with a focus group discussion. Surveys assessed perceptions of food safety importance and confidence in food supply actors using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, while focus group transcripts were analyzed thematically. Participants reported strong emotional responses, including fear, frustration, and distrust toward the food industry and regulatory bodies, while describing the documentary as informative and effective in raising awareness about foodborne illness risks and the importance of food safety practices. Differences emerged by educational background, with food science majors demonstrating more critical engagement, whereas some nonfood science participants reported intentions to adopt risky food-handling practices, such as washing raw poultry. Confidence in food supply chain actors declined significantly after viewing. At 9-day follow-up, food science students regained trust, while nonfood science students showed recovery only toward consumer-facing actors and food they prepared themselves. These findings suggest that emotionally compelling documentaries can increase food safety awareness and engagement while reducing trust and unintentionally reinforcing unsafe practices. Rather than serving as educational tools, such documentaries offer valuable lessons for improving transparent, accurate, and balanced food safety communication. PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS: This research offers food industry, government agencies, educators, and media creators with insight into how the documentary Poisoned can influence young adults' in college perceptions and responses to food safety issues. Since documentaries are widely available and can reach broad audiences, findings highlight the importance of proactive, transparent, and collaborative communication, helping audience understand how the food system works, how food safety hazards are addressed, and what can be done in the kitchen to reduce risks. Cross-sector collaboration that combines engaging storytelling with reliable educational content may improve public understanding, strengthen confidence in the food system, and encourage safer food-handling practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":193,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Food Science","volume":"91 10","pages":"e71589"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13686119/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Food Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1750-3841.71589","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
As foodborne illnesses pose a significant public health concern in the United States, the rise of streaming platforms broadens audiences' exposure to food safety documentary films. This investigation examines how the documentary Poisoned: The Dirty Truth About Your Food shapes young adults' perceptions, attitudes, and trust in the food supply chain among undergraduate students at one university in Indiana enrolled in food science (Study 1, n = 19) and nonfood science programs (Study 2, n = 59). An explanatory mixed-methods design combined surveys at three time points with a focus group discussion. Surveys assessed perceptions of food safety importance and confidence in food supply actors using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, while focus group transcripts were analyzed thematically. Participants reported strong emotional responses, including fear, frustration, and distrust toward the food industry and regulatory bodies, while describing the documentary as informative and effective in raising awareness about foodborne illness risks and the importance of food safety practices. Differences emerged by educational background, with food science majors demonstrating more critical engagement, whereas some nonfood science participants reported intentions to adopt risky food-handling practices, such as washing raw poultry. Confidence in food supply chain actors declined significantly after viewing. At 9-day follow-up, food science students regained trust, while nonfood science students showed recovery only toward consumer-facing actors and food they prepared themselves. These findings suggest that emotionally compelling documentaries can increase food safety awareness and engagement while reducing trust and unintentionally reinforcing unsafe practices. Rather than serving as educational tools, such documentaries offer valuable lessons for improving transparent, accurate, and balanced food safety communication. PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS: This research offers food industry, government agencies, educators, and media creators with insight into how the documentary Poisoned can influence young adults' in college perceptions and responses to food safety issues. Since documentaries are widely available and can reach broad audiences, findings highlight the importance of proactive, transparent, and collaborative communication, helping audience understand how the food system works, how food safety hazards are addressed, and what can be done in the kitchen to reduce risks. Cross-sector collaboration that combines engaging storytelling with reliable educational content may improve public understanding, strengthen confidence in the food system, and encourage safer food-handling practices.
期刊介绍:
The goal of the Journal of Food Science is to offer scientists, researchers, and other food professionals the opportunity to share knowledge of scientific advancements in the myriad disciplines affecting their work, through a respected peer-reviewed publication. The Journal of Food Science serves as an international forum for vital research and developments in food science.
The range of topics covered in the journal include:
-Concise Reviews and Hypotheses in Food Science
-New Horizons in Food Research
-Integrated Food Science
-Food Chemistry
-Food Engineering, Materials Science, and Nanotechnology
-Food Microbiology and Safety
-Sensory and Consumer Sciences
-Health, Nutrition, and Food
-Toxicology and Chemical Food Safety
The Journal of Food Science publishes peer-reviewed articles that cover all aspects of food science, including safety and nutrition. Reviews should be 15 to 50 typewritten pages (including tables, figures, and references), should provide in-depth coverage of a narrowly defined topic, and should embody careful evaluation (weaknesses, strengths, explanation of discrepancies in results among similar studies) of all pertinent studies, so that insightful interpretations and conclusions can be presented. Hypothesis papers are especially appropriate in pioneering areas of research or important areas that are afflicted by scientific controversy.