From traditional to distributed responsibility: moral responsibility in generative artificial intelligence

Ruiyuan Zhang
{"title":"From traditional to distributed responsibility: moral responsibility in generative artificial intelligence","authors":"Ruiyuan Zhang","doi":"10.1007/s43681-026-01453-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The increasing application of generative artificial intelligence (GAI) in social life has brought convenience and efficiency to humanity, while also giving rise to ethical dilemmas concerning security and trust, as well as challenges to moral responsibility. Moreover, the new patterns of human-machine interaction derived from this technology are challenging traditional models. GAI systems, comprising humans, artificial entities, and human-machine hybrids, function as multi-agent systems that meet the requirements of distributed morality. Distributed morality and its mechanisms for attributing responsibility determine the scope of moral responsibility in a recipient-oriented approach, appropriately attribute responsibility through causal analysis by tracing causal relations backward, and seek to guide the system as a whole towards the greater good by utilizing the cyclical feedback mechanisms of the system. Although distributed moral responsibility faces challenges in terms of fairness and social perception, it offers greater explanatory power and feasibility than traditional models of moral responsibility attribution, thereby opening up new governance pathways for addressing the ethical and moral challenges faced by GAI in its application and future development.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72137,"journal":{"name":"AI and ethics","volume":"6 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AI and ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s43681-026-01453-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The increasing application of generative artificial intelligence (GAI) in social life has brought convenience and efficiency to humanity, while also giving rise to ethical dilemmas concerning security and trust, as well as challenges to moral responsibility. Moreover, the new patterns of human-machine interaction derived from this technology are challenging traditional models. GAI systems, comprising humans, artificial entities, and human-machine hybrids, function as multi-agent systems that meet the requirements of distributed morality. Distributed morality and its mechanisms for attributing responsibility determine the scope of moral responsibility in a recipient-oriented approach, appropriately attribute responsibility through causal analysis by tracing causal relations backward, and seek to guide the system as a whole towards the greater good by utilizing the cyclical feedback mechanisms of the system. Although distributed moral responsibility faces challenges in terms of fairness and social perception, it offers greater explanatory power and feasibility than traditional models of moral responsibility attribution, thereby opening up new governance pathways for addressing the ethical and moral challenges faced by GAI in its application and future development.

从传统责任到分布式责任:生成式人工智能中的道德责任
生成式人工智能(GAI)在社会生活中的应用越来越广泛,在给人类带来便利和效率的同时,也带来了安全与信任的伦理困境,以及对道德责任的挑战。此外,由该技术衍生的新的人机交互模式正在挑战传统模型。GAI系统由人、人工实体和人机混合体组成,是满足分布式道德要求的多智能体系统。分布式道德及其责任归因机制以接受者为导向确定道德责任的范围,通过回溯因果关系,通过因果分析适当地归因责任,并利用系统的循环反馈机制,寻求引导系统整体走向更大的利益。尽管分布式道德责任在公平性和社会认知方面面临挑战,但它比传统的道德责任归因模型具有更强的解释力和可行性,从而为解决GAI在应用和未来发展中面临的伦理和道德挑战开辟了新的治理路径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书