Generalized Two Parameter Estimator in Inverse Gaussian Regression Model

Q1 Decision Sciences
Bavneet Kaur Sidhu, Manoj Kumar Tiwari, Vikas Bist, Manoj Kumar, Faisal Ababneh
{"title":"Generalized Two Parameter Estimator in Inverse Gaussian Regression Model","authors":"Bavneet Kaur Sidhu,&nbsp;Manoj Kumar Tiwari,&nbsp;Vikas Bist,&nbsp;Manoj Kumar,&nbsp;Faisal Ababneh","doi":"10.1007/s40745-025-00664-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This article introduces generalized two-parameter estimators for modelling explanatory variables in positively skewed data using the inverse Gaussian regression model. The standard approach for estimating unknown regression coefficients relies on the maximum likelihood method. Although the maximum likelihood estimator is a powerful estimation tool, its performance can be severely affected by multicollinearity among explanatory variables. When these variables are correlated, the variances and standard errors inflate, reducing estimator precision. As a result, the maximum likelihood estimator becomes unreliable for estimating regression coefficients. Similarly, in the presence of strong multicollinearity, the Ordinary Least Squares estimator also yields misleading results. In this paper, we propose a new estimator and compare it with existing methods, including the Ordinary Least Squares estimator, Ridge Regression estimator, Liu estimator, and Two-Parameter estimator. The discussion further addresses the estimation of biased parameters and examines the necessary and sufficient conditions associated with the proposed approach. We evaluate the performance of the new estimator using the matrix mean squared error criterion and a simulation study that considers various sample sizes, degrees of multicollinearity, parameter settings, and variance levels. To illustrate practical applicability, we analyze the Theoph dataset, demonstrating that the proposed estimator performs more efficiently than the maximum likelihood estimator and other established techniques. The results show that the generalized two-parameter estimators achieve lower mean squared error than maximum likelihood estimators and deliver superior performance compared to existing methods.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36280,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Data Science","volume":"13 6","pages":"1581 - 1604"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Data Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40745-025-00664-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Decision Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article introduces generalized two-parameter estimators for modelling explanatory variables in positively skewed data using the inverse Gaussian regression model. The standard approach for estimating unknown regression coefficients relies on the maximum likelihood method. Although the maximum likelihood estimator is a powerful estimation tool, its performance can be severely affected by multicollinearity among explanatory variables. When these variables are correlated, the variances and standard errors inflate, reducing estimator precision. As a result, the maximum likelihood estimator becomes unreliable for estimating regression coefficients. Similarly, in the presence of strong multicollinearity, the Ordinary Least Squares estimator also yields misleading results. In this paper, we propose a new estimator and compare it with existing methods, including the Ordinary Least Squares estimator, Ridge Regression estimator, Liu estimator, and Two-Parameter estimator. The discussion further addresses the estimation of biased parameters and examines the necessary and sufficient conditions associated with the proposed approach. We evaluate the performance of the new estimator using the matrix mean squared error criterion and a simulation study that considers various sample sizes, degrees of multicollinearity, parameter settings, and variance levels. To illustrate practical applicability, we analyze the Theoph dataset, demonstrating that the proposed estimator performs more efficiently than the maximum likelihood estimator and other established techniques. The results show that the generalized two-parameter estimators achieve lower mean squared error than maximum likelihood estimators and deliver superior performance compared to existing methods.

逆高斯回归模型中的广义二参数估计
本文介绍了用高斯反回归模型对正偏态数据中的解释变量进行建模的广义双参数估计。估计未知回归系数的标准方法依赖于极大似然法。虽然极大似然估计器是一种强大的估计工具,但解释变量之间的多重共线性会严重影响其性能。当这些变量相互关联时,方差和标准误差会增大,从而降低估计器的精度。结果,极大似然估计量在估计回归系数时变得不可靠。同样,在存在强多重共线性的情况下,普通最小二乘估计也会产生误导的结果。本文提出了一种新的估计量,并与现有的普通最小二乘估计量、Ridge回归估计量、Liu估计量和双参数估计量进行了比较。讨论进一步讨论了有偏参数的估计,并检查了与所提出的方法相关的充分必要条件。我们使用矩阵均方误差准则和考虑不同样本量、多重共线性程度、参数设置和方差水平的模拟研究来评估新估计器的性能。为了说明实际的适用性,我们分析了Theoph数据集,证明了所提出的估计器比最大似然估计器和其他现有技术更有效。结果表明,广义双参数估计比极大似然估计具有更小的均方误差,并且与现有方法相比具有更好的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Data Science
Annals of Data Science Decision Sciences-Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
93
期刊介绍: Annals of Data Science (ADS) publishes cutting-edge research findings, experimental results and case studies of data science. Although Data Science is regarded as an interdisciplinary field of using mathematics, statistics, databases, data mining, high-performance computing, knowledge management and virtualization to discover knowledge from Big Data, it should have its own scientific contents, such as axioms, laws and rules, which are fundamentally important for experts in different fields to explore their own interests from Big Data. ADS encourages contributors to address such challenging problems at this exchange platform. At present, how to discover knowledge from heterogeneous data under Big Data environment needs to be addressed.     ADS is a series of volumes edited by either the editorial office or guest editors. Guest editors will be responsible for call-for-papers and the review process for high-quality contributions in their volumes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书