Generative Artificial Intelligence in Midwifery Workforce Development: A Scoping Review Identifying an Evidence Gap.

IF 1.9
Fiona Gibb, Aurora Constantin, Robin Hill
{"title":"Generative Artificial Intelligence in Midwifery Workforce Development: A Scoping Review Identifying an Evidence Gap.","authors":"Fiona Gibb, Aurora Constantin, Robin Hill","doi":"10.1097/CIN.0000000000001632","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Generative artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly explored across health care for clinical decision-making and education. Within digital health, workforce readiness and digital capability are recognized as critical to successful technology implementation. Midwifery faces persistent workforce challenges including limited protected learning time, restricted leadership development opportunities, and unclear career pathways, yet it is unclear whether generative AI has been examined as a tool to support midwifery workforce development. A scoping review was conducted following the framework of Arksey and O'Malley with PRISMA-ScR reporting. EBSCOhost (CINAHL, MEDLINE, ERIC), Google Scholar, and Elicit were searched for English-language studies published between 2015 and 2026 examining AI in midwifery in relation to at least one of the following: post-registration education, workforce, professional development, leadership, and career progression. Findings were synthesized using framework analysis. Eight studies met the inclusion criteria. Research focused predominantly on clinical decision-making, predictive models, and undergraduate education. No studies examined generative AI tools to support practicing midwives' professional development, leadership, or career progression. Attitudes towards AI varied with digital literacy, generational cohort, and ethical concerns. Generative AI in midwifery workforce development is unexamined in the empirical literature. Further research is required to understand acceptability, risks, and value within an ethically governed implementation framework.</p>","PeriodicalId":520598,"journal":{"name":"Computers, informatics, nursing : CIN","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers, informatics, nursing : CIN","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CIN.0000000000001632","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Generative artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly explored across health care for clinical decision-making and education. Within digital health, workforce readiness and digital capability are recognized as critical to successful technology implementation. Midwifery faces persistent workforce challenges including limited protected learning time, restricted leadership development opportunities, and unclear career pathways, yet it is unclear whether generative AI has been examined as a tool to support midwifery workforce development. A scoping review was conducted following the framework of Arksey and O'Malley with PRISMA-ScR reporting. EBSCOhost (CINAHL, MEDLINE, ERIC), Google Scholar, and Elicit were searched for English-language studies published between 2015 and 2026 examining AI in midwifery in relation to at least one of the following: post-registration education, workforce, professional development, leadership, and career progression. Findings were synthesized using framework analysis. Eight studies met the inclusion criteria. Research focused predominantly on clinical decision-making, predictive models, and undergraduate education. No studies examined generative AI tools to support practicing midwives' professional development, leadership, or career progression. Attitudes towards AI varied with digital literacy, generational cohort, and ethical concerns. Generative AI in midwifery workforce development is unexamined in the empirical literature. Further research is required to understand acceptability, risks, and value within an ethically governed implementation framework.

助产劳动力发展中的生成人工智能:确定证据差距的范围审查。
生成式人工智能(AI)在医疗保健领域越来越多地用于临床决策和教育。在数字医疗领域,劳动力准备和数字能力被认为是成功实施技术的关键。助产士面临着持续的劳动力挑战,包括有限的受保护学习时间、有限的领导力发展机会和不明确的职业道路,但尚不清楚是否已将生成人工智能作为支持助产士劳动力发展的工具进行了研究。根据Arksey和O'Malley的框架,根据PRISMA-ScR报告进行了范围审查。我们检索了EBSCOhost (CINAHL、MEDLINE、ERIC)、谷歌Scholar和Elicit在2015年至2026年间发表的英语研究,这些研究调查了助产学中人工智能与以下至少一项的关系:注册后教育、劳动力、专业发展、领导力和职业发展。采用框架分析对研究结果进行综合。8项研究符合纳入标准。研究主要集中在临床决策、预测模型和本科教育方面。没有研究考察生成式人工智能工具支持执业助产士的专业发展、领导力或职业发展。对人工智能的态度因数字素养、代际群体和伦理问题而异。在助产士劳动力发展的生成人工智能是未经检验的实证文献。需要进一步的研究来理解道德治理的实现框架中的可接受性、风险和价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书