A comparison of clinical and procedural outcomes of transforaminal versus parasagittal interlaminar epidural steroid injections for radicular pain secondary to lumbar disc herniation.

Salim Taner Gözükızıl, Halil İbrahim Altun
{"title":"A comparison of clinical and procedural outcomes of transforaminal versus parasagittal interlaminar epidural steroid injections for radicular pain secondary to lumbar disc herniation.","authors":"Salim Taner Gözükızıl, Halil İbrahim Altun","doi":"10.5606/agri.2026.96","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aims to compare the clinical and procedural outcomes of transforaminal epidural steroid injections (TFESIs) and parasagittal interlaminar epidural steroid injections (P-ILESIs) in patients with unilateral radicular pain secondary to lumbar disc herniation (LDH).</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Between January 2024 and June 2025, a total of 162 patients with unilateral radicular pain caused by single-level LDH were included in this retrospective, observational cohort study. The patients were divided into the two groups based on the technique as the TFESI group (n = 82) and the P-ILESI group (n = 80). Pain, disability, sleep quality, and health-related quality of life were assessed using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), and Short Form-12 (SF-12), respectively at baseline, one month, and six months. Fluoroscopy time and cumulative radiation dose were also recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the patients, 120 were male and 42 were female with a median age of 47 (range 22 to 65) years. Both techniques significantly improved pain, disability, sleep quality, and quality of life at one and six months (p < 0.001). The reduction in NRS from baseline was greater with TFESI at one month (p = 0.008), but not at six months (p = 0.545). The ODI scores were lower with TFESI at one month, although the magnitude of improvement from baseline did not significantly differ and no difference was observed at six months. Quality of life outcomes were comparable between the groups. The P-ILESI required longer fluoroscopy time and higher radiation exposure than TFESI (p < 0.001 for both). No major complications occurred, and minor adverse events were infrequent and comparable between the groups (p = 0.764).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both TFESI and P-ILESI appear to be effective and safe approaches for the treatment of radicular pain associated with LDH. The choice of epidural approach should be individualized according to clinical and anatomical considerations, as well as operator experience.</p>","PeriodicalId":101341,"journal":{"name":"Agri : Agri (Algoloji) Dernegi'nin Yayin organidir = The journal of the Turkish Society of Algology","volume":"38 4","pages":"237-246"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agri : Agri (Algoloji) Dernegi'nin Yayin organidir = The journal of the Turkish Society of Algology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5606/agri.2026.96","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study aims to compare the clinical and procedural outcomes of transforaminal epidural steroid injections (TFESIs) and parasagittal interlaminar epidural steroid injections (P-ILESIs) in patients with unilateral radicular pain secondary to lumbar disc herniation (LDH).

Patients and methods: Between January 2024 and June 2025, a total of 162 patients with unilateral radicular pain caused by single-level LDH were included in this retrospective, observational cohort study. The patients were divided into the two groups based on the technique as the TFESI group (n = 82) and the P-ILESI group (n = 80). Pain, disability, sleep quality, and health-related quality of life were assessed using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), and Short Form-12 (SF-12), respectively at baseline, one month, and six months. Fluoroscopy time and cumulative radiation dose were also recorded.

Results: Of the patients, 120 were male and 42 were female with a median age of 47 (range 22 to 65) years. Both techniques significantly improved pain, disability, sleep quality, and quality of life at one and six months (p < 0.001). The reduction in NRS from baseline was greater with TFESI at one month (p = 0.008), but not at six months (p = 0.545). The ODI scores were lower with TFESI at one month, although the magnitude of improvement from baseline did not significantly differ and no difference was observed at six months. Quality of life outcomes were comparable between the groups. The P-ILESI required longer fluoroscopy time and higher radiation exposure than TFESI (p < 0.001 for both). No major complications occurred, and minor adverse events were infrequent and comparable between the groups (p = 0.764).

Conclusion: Both TFESI and P-ILESI appear to be effective and safe approaches for the treatment of radicular pain associated with LDH. The choice of epidural approach should be individualized according to clinical and anatomical considerations, as well as operator experience.

经椎间孔与旁矢状突椎间硬膜外类固醇注射治疗腰椎间盘突出症继发神经根性疼痛的临床和手术结果比较。
背景:本研究旨在比较经椎间孔硬膜外类固醇注射(tfeis)和旁矢状突椎间硬膜外类固醇注射(P-ILESIs)治疗腰椎间盘突出症(LDH)继发单侧神经根性疼痛的临床和手术结果。患者和方法:在2024年1月至2025年6月期间,共有162例由单水平LDH引起的单侧神经根疼痛患者被纳入这项回顾性观察性队列研究。根据技术将患者分为TFESI组(n = 82)和P-ILESI组(n = 80)。分别在基线、1个月和6个月时使用数字评定量表(NRS)、Oswestry残疾指数(ODI)、匹兹堡睡眠质量指数(PSQI)和短表12 (SF-12)评估疼痛、残疾、睡眠质量和健康相关生活质量。同时记录透视时间和累积辐射剂量。结果:患者中男性120例,女性42例,中位年龄47岁(22 ~ 65岁)。两种技术在1个月和6个月时均显著改善了疼痛、残疾、睡眠质量和生活质量(p < 0.001)。与基线相比,TFESI在1个月时的NRS降低幅度更大(p = 0.008),但在6个月时则没有(p = 0.545)。在1个月时,使用TFESI的ODI得分较低,尽管与基线相比改善的幅度没有显著差异,6个月时也没有观察到差异。两组之间的生活质量结果具有可比性。p - ilesi比TFESI需要更长的透视时间和更高的辐射暴露(两者p < 0.001)。两组间无重大并发症发生,轻微不良事件发生率低,具有可比性(p = 0.764)。结论:TFESI和P-ILESI都是治疗LDH相关神经根痛的有效和安全的方法。硬膜外入路的选择应根据临床和解剖学的考虑以及操作者的经验进行个体化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书