Pandemic Politics: Developing Vaccines in Canada's Anti-vax Heartland.

Erika Dyck, Jim Clifford, Derek Cameron, Patrick Chassé, Fionnuala Braun, Nazeem Muhajarine
{"title":"Pandemic Politics: Developing Vaccines in Canada's Anti-vax Heartland.","authors":"Erika Dyck, Jim Clifford, Derek Cameron, Patrick Chassé, Fionnuala Braun, Nazeem Muhajarine","doi":"10.3138/cjhh.726-102024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The COVID-19 pandemic in Saskatchewan is a story of extremes. Through most of 2020, low case numbers, effective policy, and broad agreement among government officials, health care workers, and the public sustained a consensus that strict measures and vaccination offered the best responses; however, that consensus collapsed. The province shifted from a focal point for Canadian vaccine development to a staging ground for an anti-vaccine movement that took root on social media and then in street protests. Premier Scott Moe moved from a pro-vaccine, pro-consensus stance to a confrontational position questioning federal policies, public health measures, and vaccines. Combining traditional news sources, social media, and interviews with residents and VIDO-InterVac researchers, we track this shift. We argue that the pandemic fostered unmoderated social media discourse that overwhelmed collective responses, shaped health policies, and politicized vaccines as pro-government. Influencers inflated the movement's threat and aligned vaccine uptake to trust in science, with significant political consequences.</p>","PeriodicalId":520244,"journal":{"name":"Canadian journal of health history = Revue canadienne d'histoire de la sante","volume":"43 1","pages":"157-187"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian journal of health history = Revue canadienne d'histoire de la sante","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3138/cjhh.726-102024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/10/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic in Saskatchewan is a story of extremes. Through most of 2020, low case numbers, effective policy, and broad agreement among government officials, health care workers, and the public sustained a consensus that strict measures and vaccination offered the best responses; however, that consensus collapsed. The province shifted from a focal point for Canadian vaccine development to a staging ground for an anti-vaccine movement that took root on social media and then in street protests. Premier Scott Moe moved from a pro-vaccine, pro-consensus stance to a confrontational position questioning federal policies, public health measures, and vaccines. Combining traditional news sources, social media, and interviews with residents and VIDO-InterVac researchers, we track this shift. We argue that the pandemic fostered unmoderated social media discourse that overwhelmed collective responses, shaped health policies, and politicized vaccines as pro-government. Influencers inflated the movement's threat and aligned vaccine uptake to trust in science, with significant political consequences.

流行病政治:在加拿大反疫苗中心研制疫苗。
萨斯喀彻温省的COVID-19大流行是一个极端的故事。在2020年的大部分时间里,低病例数、有效的政策以及政府官员、卫生保健工作者和公众之间的广泛共识使人们一致认为,严格的措施和疫苗接种是最好的应对措施;然而,这种共识崩溃了。该省从加拿大疫苗开发的焦点转变为反疫苗运动的集结地,反疫苗运动在社交媒体上生根发芽,然后在街头抗议活动中生根发芽。总理斯科特·莫从支持疫苗、支持共识的立场转变为对联邦政策、公共卫生措施和疫苗提出质疑的对抗立场。结合传统新闻来源、社交媒体、对居民和video - intervac研究人员的采访,我们追踪了这一转变。我们认为,大流行助长了不受节制的社交媒体话语,这些话语压倒了集体反应,影响了卫生政策,并将疫苗政治化为亲政府。有影响力的人夸大了这场运动的威胁,并将疫苗接种与对科学的信任联系起来,带来了重大的政治后果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书