Association of escitalopram prophylaxis with pain intensity in tension-type headache: A retrospective, comparative cohort study.

Ahmet Burak Elbeyli, Ali Zeynal Abidin Tak
{"title":"Association of escitalopram prophylaxis with pain intensity in tension-type headache: A retrospective, comparative cohort study.","authors":"Ahmet Burak Elbeyli, Ali Zeynal Abidin Tak","doi":"10.5606/agri.2026.170","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aims to evaluate the association between escitalopram prophylaxis and pain intensity in patients with tension-type headache.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This retrospective, comparative cohort study included a total of 503 patients between July 1st, 2022 and October 1st, 2022. The patients were divided into two groups according to their treatment approach. The first group (Group 1, n = 300) consisted of patients who initiated escitalopram prophylaxis. The second group (Group 2, n = 203) consisted of patients who did not receive prophylactic treatment and were monitored with symptomatic treatment. Pain intensity was assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at baseline and after approximately three months. Between-group changes were compared, and follow-up VAS scores were evaluated using regression models adjusted for baseline VAS, age and sex. The Headache Screening Questionnaire (HSQ) findings were considered exploratory.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of a total of 503 patients, 159 were male and 344 were female with a mean age of 33.00 ± 3.44 (range, 22 to 46) years. The groups were similar in age and sex distribution, although baseline VAS scores were higher in the escitalopram group. The mean VAS scores decreased from 5.06 ± 1.23 to 4.55 ± 1.17 in the escitalopram group and increased from 4.68 ± 1.40 to 4.92 ± 1.41 in the symptomatic treatment group. The difference in change between groups was significant. Escitalopram use remained associated with lower follow-up VAS scores after adjustment for baseline VAS, age and sex. The HSQ findings were exploratory and were not interpreted as confirmatory evidence of treatment efficacy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Escitalopram prophylaxis was associated with lower pain intensity after approximately three months. As treatment allocation was non-randomized and baseline pain severity differed between groups, the findings should be interpreted cautiously. Escitalopram warrants further investigation in patients who cannot tolerate or are unsuitable for first-line prophylactic treatments.</p>","PeriodicalId":101341,"journal":{"name":"Agri : Agri (Algoloji) Dernegi'nin Yayin organidir = The journal of the Turkish Society of Algology","volume":"38 4","pages":"264-271"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agri : Agri (Algoloji) Dernegi'nin Yayin organidir = The journal of the Turkish Society of Algology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5606/agri.2026.170","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study aims to evaluate the association between escitalopram prophylaxis and pain intensity in patients with tension-type headache.

Patients and methods: This retrospective, comparative cohort study included a total of 503 patients between July 1st, 2022 and October 1st, 2022. The patients were divided into two groups according to their treatment approach. The first group (Group 1, n = 300) consisted of patients who initiated escitalopram prophylaxis. The second group (Group 2, n = 203) consisted of patients who did not receive prophylactic treatment and were monitored with symptomatic treatment. Pain intensity was assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at baseline and after approximately three months. Between-group changes were compared, and follow-up VAS scores were evaluated using regression models adjusted for baseline VAS, age and sex. The Headache Screening Questionnaire (HSQ) findings were considered exploratory.

Results: Of a total of 503 patients, 159 were male and 344 were female with a mean age of 33.00 ± 3.44 (range, 22 to 46) years. The groups were similar in age and sex distribution, although baseline VAS scores were higher in the escitalopram group. The mean VAS scores decreased from 5.06 ± 1.23 to 4.55 ± 1.17 in the escitalopram group and increased from 4.68 ± 1.40 to 4.92 ± 1.41 in the symptomatic treatment group. The difference in change between groups was significant. Escitalopram use remained associated with lower follow-up VAS scores after adjustment for baseline VAS, age and sex. The HSQ findings were exploratory and were not interpreted as confirmatory evidence of treatment efficacy.

Conclusion: Escitalopram prophylaxis was associated with lower pain intensity after approximately three months. As treatment allocation was non-randomized and baseline pain severity differed between groups, the findings should be interpreted cautiously. Escitalopram warrants further investigation in patients who cannot tolerate or are unsuitable for first-line prophylactic treatments.

艾司西酞普兰预防与紧张性头痛疼痛强度的关系:一项回顾性、比较队列研究。
背景:本研究旨在评估艾司西酞普兰预防与紧张性头痛患者疼痛强度的关系。患者和方法:这项回顾性、比较队列研究共纳入503例患者,时间为2022年7月1日至2022年10月1日。根据治疗方法将患者分为两组。第一组(组1,n = 300)由开始艾司西酞普兰预防的患者组成。第二组(组2,n = 203)患者未接受预防治疗,给予对症治疗监测。在基线和大约三个月后使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估疼痛强度。比较组间变化,并使用基线VAS、年龄和性别调整后的回归模型评估随访VAS评分。头痛筛查问卷(HSQ)的结果被认为是探索性的。结果:503例患者中,男性159例,女性344例,平均年龄(33.00±3.44)岁(22 ~ 46岁)。两组在年龄和性别分布上相似,尽管艾司西酞普兰组的基线VAS评分更高。艾司西酞普兰组VAS平均评分从5.06±1.23下降至4.55±1.17,对症治疗组VAS平均评分从4.68±1.40上升至4.92±1.41。两组之间的变化差异显著。在调整基线VAS、年龄和性别后,使用艾司西酞普兰仍与较低的随访VAS评分相关。HSQ结果是探索性的,不能被解释为治疗效果的确认性证据。结论:艾司西酞普兰预防与大约三个月后疼痛强度降低有关。由于治疗分配是非随机的,各组之间的基线疼痛严重程度不同,研究结果应谨慎解释。对于不能耐受或不适合一线预防治疗的患者,艾司西酞普兰值得进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书