Clustering of takeaway outlets around London schools: A geospatial analysis

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Health & Place Pub Date : 2026-11-01 Epub Date: 2026-10-20 DOI:10.1016/j.healthplace.2026.103753
Chiara Gericke, Clare Llewellyn, Thomas Burgoine, Adam Dennett
{"title":"Clustering of takeaway outlets around London schools: A geospatial analysis","authors":"Chiara Gericke,&nbsp;Clare Llewellyn,&nbsp;Thomas Burgoine,&nbsp;Adam Dennett","doi":"10.1016/j.healthplace.2026.103753","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Rising childhood obesity has been linked to unhealthy built food environments, prompting the inclusion of takeaway management zones in the revised 2024 National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF). This study examines where takeaway outlet density is greatest around London schools, to guide policymakers on distance thresholds for takeaway management zones.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We used Ordnance Survey data on takeaway outlets and UK Government data on Greater London schools from December 2021. Deprivation was assessed using the 2019 Index of Multiple Deprivation. Extended spatial point pattern analyses were applied to assess takeaway outlet density by Euclidean distance and walking-time catchments from schools, and area-level deprivation of schools.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>Across London, takeaway outlet density peaked within approximately 200 m of schools at around 12 outlets per km<sup>2</sup>, approximately twice the Greater London average of 6 outlets per km<sup>2</sup>, and remained above average up to around 400 m. The highest density within walking catchments was within 10 min, although distributions varied, reflecting four patterns: (i) localised peak with gradual decline, (ii) extended peak with further peaks, (iii) sustained high density with sharp decline, and (iv) low density with extended decline.</div><div>Among outlets located within 400 m of schools, density peaked at approximately 9 takeaway outlets per km<sup>2</sup> in the 20-30% most deprived areas, compared with around 0.8 takeaway outlets per km<sup>2</sup> in the 10% least deprived areas - approximately 12 times higher. This deprivation gradient was not observed among takeaway outlets located more than 400 m from schools.</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>Findings support the implementation of takeaway management zones in London as outlined in the NPPF, set at 400m, or a 10-min walk from schools. However, variation across boroughs suggests local authorities may need to adjust the size or design of these zones. In the most deprived areas and central London, school-only measures may be insufficient, requiring complementary planning policies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49302,"journal":{"name":"Health & Place","volume":"102 ","pages":"Article 103753"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health & Place","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1353829226001486","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/10/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Rising childhood obesity has been linked to unhealthy built food environments, prompting the inclusion of takeaway management zones in the revised 2024 National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF). This study examines where takeaway outlet density is greatest around London schools, to guide policymakers on distance thresholds for takeaway management zones.

Methods

We used Ordnance Survey data on takeaway outlets and UK Government data on Greater London schools from December 2021. Deprivation was assessed using the 2019 Index of Multiple Deprivation. Extended spatial point pattern analyses were applied to assess takeaway outlet density by Euclidean distance and walking-time catchments from schools, and area-level deprivation of schools.

Findings

Across London, takeaway outlet density peaked within approximately 200 m of schools at around 12 outlets per km2, approximately twice the Greater London average of 6 outlets per km2, and remained above average up to around 400 m. The highest density within walking catchments was within 10 min, although distributions varied, reflecting four patterns: (i) localised peak with gradual decline, (ii) extended peak with further peaks, (iii) sustained high density with sharp decline, and (iv) low density with extended decline.
Among outlets located within 400 m of schools, density peaked at approximately 9 takeaway outlets per km2 in the 20-30% most deprived areas, compared with around 0.8 takeaway outlets per km2 in the 10% least deprived areas - approximately 12 times higher. This deprivation gradient was not observed among takeaway outlets located more than 400 m from schools.

Interpretation

Findings support the implementation of takeaway management zones in London as outlined in the NPPF, set at 400m, or a 10-min walk from schools. However, variation across boroughs suggests local authorities may need to adjust the size or design of these zones. In the most deprived areas and central London, school-only measures may be insufficient, requiring complementary planning policies.
伦敦学校周边外卖店聚集:地理空间分析。
背景:不断上升的儿童肥胖与不健康的建筑食品环境有关,促使在修订的2024年国家规划政策框架(NPPF)中纳入外卖管理区。本研究考察了伦敦学校附近外卖店密度最大的地方,以指导决策者确定外卖管理区的距离阈值。方法:从2021年12月起,我们使用了关于外卖店的条例调查数据和英国政府关于大伦敦学校的数据。贫困程度是用2019年多重剥夺指数来评估的。应用扩展空间点模式分析,通过距离学校的欧氏距离、步行时间和区域层面的学校剥夺来评估外卖网点密度。研究结果:在整个伦敦,外卖店密度在学校附近约200 米范围内达到峰值,每平方公里约12家,约为大伦敦平均水平(每平方公里6家)的两倍,并且在400 米范围内保持高于平均水平。步行集水区内的最高密度在10 min以内,但分布各不相同,反映出四种模式:(i)局部峰值逐渐下降,(ii)延伸峰与进一步峰,(iii)持续高密度急剧下降,以及(iv)低密度持续下降。在距离学校400 米以内的外卖店中,20-30%最贫困地区的外卖店密度最高,约为每平方公里9家,而10%最贫困地区的外卖店密度约为每平方公里0.8家,大约高出12倍。这种剥夺梯度在距离学校400 米以上的外卖店中没有观察到。解释:调查结果支持在伦敦实施NPPF中概述的外卖管理区,设置在距离学校400米或步行10分钟的地方。然而,各区之间的差异表明,地方当局可能需要调整这些区域的规模或设计。在最贫困的地区和伦敦市中心,仅靠学校的措施可能是不够的,需要配套的规划政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health & Place
Health & Place PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
6.20%
发文量
176
审稿时长
29 days
期刊介绍: he journal is an interdisciplinary journal dedicated to the study of all aspects of health and health care in which place or location matters.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书