Distilling Direct Effects via Conditional Differential Gene Expression Analysis.

IF 5.4
Jiaqi Gu, Andrew Skelton, James Staley, Pierce Popson, Lei Peng, Xiaoyu Song, Juliet Knowles, Zihuai He
{"title":"Distilling Direct Effects via Conditional Differential Gene Expression Analysis.","authors":"Jiaqi Gu, Andrew Skelton, James Staley, Pierce Popson, Lei Peng, Xiaoyu Song, Juliet Knowles, Zihuai He","doi":"10.1093/bioinformatics/btag784","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Motivation: </strong>Differential gene expression (DGE) analysis is foundational for interpreting RNA sequencing data, but it conflates direct biological effects with correlations propagated through gene co-expression. Across three RNA sequencing datasets (including a genome-scale perturb-seq experiment), we find that only a small fraction of differentially expressed genes have direct effects on the trait of interest, while the majority are undirected or passengers whose associations are mediated through other genes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>To distinguish direct effect genes, we introduce conditional differential gene expression (CDGE) analysis, a framework that tests for conditional rather than marginal association between each gene and the trait of interest. Implemented via the GhostKnockoff procedure with lasso regression, CDGE delivers false discovery rate control, operates on summary statistics from existing DGE pipelines, and accommodates batch effects. The genes identified by CDGE mediate the effects of most other differentially expressed genes and show stronger enrichment for known protein-protein interactions and biological pathways than DGE-identified genes. These results suggest that the field has been systematically over-interpreting DGE outputs, and that distinguishing direct from mediated effects is essential for prioritizing genes for functional follow-up and therapeutic development.</p><p><strong>Availability: </strong>To facilitate public access to knockoff-based CDGE analysis, we have developed the R package \"KnockoffCDGE\" as an integrated implementation, which is freely available at https://github.com/GuJQ5/KnockoffCDGE (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.23241517).</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.</p>","PeriodicalId":93899,"journal":{"name":"Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btag784","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Motivation: Differential gene expression (DGE) analysis is foundational for interpreting RNA sequencing data, but it conflates direct biological effects with correlations propagated through gene co-expression. Across three RNA sequencing datasets (including a genome-scale perturb-seq experiment), we find that only a small fraction of differentially expressed genes have direct effects on the trait of interest, while the majority are undirected or passengers whose associations are mediated through other genes.

Results: To distinguish direct effect genes, we introduce conditional differential gene expression (CDGE) analysis, a framework that tests for conditional rather than marginal association between each gene and the trait of interest. Implemented via the GhostKnockoff procedure with lasso regression, CDGE delivers false discovery rate control, operates on summary statistics from existing DGE pipelines, and accommodates batch effects. The genes identified by CDGE mediate the effects of most other differentially expressed genes and show stronger enrichment for known protein-protein interactions and biological pathways than DGE-identified genes. These results suggest that the field has been systematically over-interpreting DGE outputs, and that distinguishing direct from mediated effects is essential for prioritizing genes for functional follow-up and therapeutic development.

Availability: To facilitate public access to knockoff-based CDGE analysis, we have developed the R package "KnockoffCDGE" as an integrated implementation, which is freely available at https://github.com/GuJQ5/KnockoffCDGE (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.23241517).

Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

通过条件差异基因表达分析提取直接效应。
动机:差异基因表达(DGE)分析是解释RNA测序数据的基础,但它将直接生物学效应与通过基因共表达传播的相关性混为一谈。通过三个RNA测序数据集(包括基因组规模的扰动序列实验),我们发现只有一小部分差异表达基因对感兴趣的性状有直接影响,而大多数差异表达基因是未定向的或通过其他基因介导的。结果:为了区分直接影响基因,我们引入了条件差异基因表达(CDGE)分析,这是一个测试每个基因与感兴趣性状之间的条件关联而不是边际关联的框架。CDGE通过GhostKnockoff过程和套索回归实现,提供错误发现率控制,操作现有DGE管道的汇总统计数据,并适应批处理效果。与dge鉴定的基因相比,CDGE鉴定的基因介导了大多数其他差异表达基因的作用,并且在已知的蛋白质-蛋白质相互作用和生物途径中表现出更强的富集。这些结果表明,该领域一直在系统地过度解释DGE的输出,区分直接效应和介导效应对于功能随访和治疗开发的基因优先级至关重要。可用性:为了方便公众获取基于仿制品的CDGE分析,我们开发了R包“KnockoffCDGE”作为一个集成实现,可在https://github.com/GuJQ5/KnockoffCDGE (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.23241517)上免费获得。补充信息:补充数据可在生物信息学在线获取。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书