Evaluation of an artificial intelligence model in assessing the severity of gastritis during gastroscopy: A pilot study.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Krishnamoorthy Rajaram, Palaniappan Sakthivel, Sundaram Easwaramoorthy, Chandrasekar Sakthivel
{"title":"Evaluation of an artificial intelligence model in assessing the severity of gastritis during gastroscopy: A pilot study.","authors":"Krishnamoorthy Rajaram, Palaniappan Sakthivel, Sundaram Easwaramoorthy, Chandrasekar Sakthivel","doi":"10.4103/jmas.jmas_224_26","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gastritis diagnosis via endoscopy remains highly subjective, often leading to inter-observer variability and the misdiagnosis of early inflammatory changes as congestive portal gastropathy. While Computer-Aided Diagnosis (CAD) shows promise, the \"paucity of labelled data\" remains a significant barrier to clinical implementation.</p><p><strong>Aim and objectives: </strong>This study aimed to develop and validate a scalable deep-learning solution using a hybrid CNN-Vision Transformer (ViT) architecture to assist endoscopists in the real-time severity stratification of gastritis (Normal, Mild, Moderate, and Severe).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We utilized 4,462 high-definition, anonymised endoscopic images annotated by expert gastroenterologists using the Kyoto Classification as a benchmark. A multi-branch parallel processing architecture was developed, combining a CNN-based branch for local feature extraction (texture and erythema) and a Vision Transformer (ViT) for global context learning. Data augmentation expanded the training set to over 68,000 images to prevent overfitting. Performance was evaluated using Accuracy, Precision, Recall, and the Matthews Correlation Coefficient (MCC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The hybrid model achieved an Overall Classification Accuracy of 91.4% and a Matthews Correlation Coefficient (MCC) of 0.90, indicating a near-perfect correlation with clinical ground truth. The system demonstrated exceptional performance in the \"Normal\" category with 99% specificity, providing a highly dependable negative result. Precision (0.8892) and Recall (0.8481) remained robust across all categories, significantly reducing the risk of over-diagnosing gastropathy as gastritis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The proposed hybrid AI architecture provides a robust, real-time \"second opinion\" tool for endoscopists. By integrating local and global mucosal patterns, the system achieves high-precision severity stratification, potentially reducing unnecessary biopsies and minimizing diagnostic errors caused by inter-observer variability in the endoscopy suite.</p>","PeriodicalId":48905,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Minimal Access Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Minimal Access Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jmas.jmas_224_26","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Gastritis diagnosis via endoscopy remains highly subjective, often leading to inter-observer variability and the misdiagnosis of early inflammatory changes as congestive portal gastropathy. While Computer-Aided Diagnosis (CAD) shows promise, the "paucity of labelled data" remains a significant barrier to clinical implementation.

Aim and objectives: This study aimed to develop and validate a scalable deep-learning solution using a hybrid CNN-Vision Transformer (ViT) architecture to assist endoscopists in the real-time severity stratification of gastritis (Normal, Mild, Moderate, and Severe).

Materials and methods: We utilized 4,462 high-definition, anonymised endoscopic images annotated by expert gastroenterologists using the Kyoto Classification as a benchmark. A multi-branch parallel processing architecture was developed, combining a CNN-based branch for local feature extraction (texture and erythema) and a Vision Transformer (ViT) for global context learning. Data augmentation expanded the training set to over 68,000 images to prevent overfitting. Performance was evaluated using Accuracy, Precision, Recall, and the Matthews Correlation Coefficient (MCC).

Results: The hybrid model achieved an Overall Classification Accuracy of 91.4% and a Matthews Correlation Coefficient (MCC) of 0.90, indicating a near-perfect correlation with clinical ground truth. The system demonstrated exceptional performance in the "Normal" category with 99% specificity, providing a highly dependable negative result. Precision (0.8892) and Recall (0.8481) remained robust across all categories, significantly reducing the risk of over-diagnosing gastropathy as gastritis.

Conclusion: The proposed hybrid AI architecture provides a robust, real-time "second opinion" tool for endoscopists. By integrating local and global mucosal patterns, the system achieves high-precision severity stratification, potentially reducing unnecessary biopsies and minimizing diagnostic errors caused by inter-observer variability in the endoscopy suite.

评估胃镜检查中评估胃炎严重程度的人工智能模型:一项初步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
151
审稿时长
36 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Minimal Access Surgery (JMAS), the official publication of Indian Association of Gastrointestinal Endo Surgeons, launched in early 2005. The JMAS, a quarterly publication, is the first English-language journal from India, as also from this part of the world, dedicated to Minimal Access Surgery. The JMAS boasts an outstanding editorial board comprising of Indian and international experts in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书