Pulsed Field Ablation for Cardiac Arrhythmias: Industry Landscape and US Food and Drug Administration-approved Platforms (2025).

Q3 Medicine
Journal of Innovations in Cardiac Rhythm Management Pub Date : 2026-07-15 eCollection Date: 2026-07-01 DOI:10.19102/icrm.2026.17073
Amar Ghaleb, Abimbola Kolawole, Usher Khan, Arfaat M Khan
{"title":"Pulsed Field Ablation for Cardiac Arrhythmias: Industry Landscape and US Food and Drug Administration-approved Platforms (2025).","authors":"Amar Ghaleb, Abimbola Kolawole, Usher Khan, Arfaat M Khan","doi":"10.19102/icrm.2026.17073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pulsed field ablation (PFA) has rapidly advanced from an experimental modality to a front-line therapy for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF). Unlike thermal approaches such as radiofrequency (RF) or cryoablation, PFA relies on irreversible electroporation, producing rapid and selective myocardial lesions with minimal risk of collateral injury. This review examines the contemporary landscape of PFA technology, with emphasis on recent United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approvals that have expanded PFA from single-energy, single-shot systems toward focal and hybrid ablation strategies. Particular focus is placed on FDA-approved platforms, including PulseSelect™ (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA), FARAPULSE™ (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA, USA), and VARIPULSE™ (Biosense Webster, Diamond Bar, CA, USA), as well as next-generation systems such as the Affera Sphere-9™ dual-energy RF-PFA platform (Medtronic) and the Volt™ focal PFA system (Abbott, Chicago, IL, USA). Differences in catheter design, energy delivery, workflow, mapping integration, regulatory labeling, and clinical outcomes are reviewed. By contextualizing these platforms within evolving ablation strategies, this review highlights a second evolutionary phase of PFA focused on procedural flexibility, lesion durability, and integration with established electrophysiology (EP) workflows, with implications for future AF management and EP lab practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":36299,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Innovations in Cardiac Rhythm Management","volume":"17 7","pages":"6813-6818"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13679919/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Innovations in Cardiac Rhythm Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19102/icrm.2026.17073","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pulsed field ablation (PFA) has rapidly advanced from an experimental modality to a front-line therapy for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF). Unlike thermal approaches such as radiofrequency (RF) or cryoablation, PFA relies on irreversible electroporation, producing rapid and selective myocardial lesions with minimal risk of collateral injury. This review examines the contemporary landscape of PFA technology, with emphasis on recent United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approvals that have expanded PFA from single-energy, single-shot systems toward focal and hybrid ablation strategies. Particular focus is placed on FDA-approved platforms, including PulseSelect™ (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA), FARAPULSE™ (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA, USA), and VARIPULSE™ (Biosense Webster, Diamond Bar, CA, USA), as well as next-generation systems such as the Affera Sphere-9™ dual-energy RF-PFA platform (Medtronic) and the Volt™ focal PFA system (Abbott, Chicago, IL, USA). Differences in catheter design, energy delivery, workflow, mapping integration, regulatory labeling, and clinical outcomes are reviewed. By contextualizing these platforms within evolving ablation strategies, this review highlights a second evolutionary phase of PFA focused on procedural flexibility, lesion durability, and integration with established electrophysiology (EP) workflows, with implications for future AF management and EP lab practice.

心律失常的脉冲场消融:行业前景和美国食品和药物管理局批准的平台(2025)。
脉冲场消融(PFA)已迅速从实验模式发展为心房颤动(AF)导管消融的一线治疗方法。与射频(RF)或冷冻消融等热方法不同,PFA依赖于不可逆的电穿孔,产生快速和选择性的心肌病变,附带损伤的风险最小。本文回顾了PFA技术的当代发展趋势,重点介绍了美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)最近批准的将PFA从单能量、单针系统扩展到局灶和混合消融策略。特别关注fda批准的平台,包括PulseSelect™(Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA)、FARAPULSE™(Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA, USA)和VARIPULSE™(Biosense Webster, Diamond Bar, CA, USA),以及下一代系统,如Affera Sphere-9™双能RF-PFA平台(Medtronic)和Volt™focal PFA系统(Abbott, Chicago, IL, USA)。本文回顾了导管设计、能量输送、工作流程、制图整合、监管标签和临床结果的差异。通过将这些平台置于不断发展的消融策略中,本综述强调了PFA的第二个进化阶段,重点是程序灵活性、病变持久性以及与已建立的电生理(EP)工作流程的整合,这对未来房颤管理和EP实验室实践具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Innovations in Cardiac Rhythm Management
Journal of Innovations in Cardiac Rhythm Management Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
70
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书