Identifying Social Need Trends Among Emergency Department Super-Users: A Latent Class Analysis.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Shwath Kumaravel, Emily Parker, Eleanor Friedman, Kimberly A Stanford
{"title":"Identifying Social Need Trends Among Emergency Department Super-Users: A Latent Class Analysis.","authors":"Shwath Kumaravel, Emily Parker, Eleanor Friedman, Kimberly A Stanford","doi":"10.5811/westjem.58307","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Frequent emergency department (ED) users, particularly those with high rates of use, often experience complex social determinants of health (SDOH) that contribute to their repeated visits and may lead to adverse health outcomes. Our objective in this study was to characterize the needs most commonly affecting this population, which may support the creation of tailored interventions with a higher chance of success.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective analysis of patients evaluated by an ED social medicine team in a large urban academic ED from May 2021-December 2023. Patients were identified either via frequent ED use (patients with the 10 highest number of visits each month) or referred by ED staff. We assigned 11 categories of medical, mental health, and social needs through chart review and team documentation. The primary outcome was the identification of distinct need-based subgroups among patients with high ED use, using latent class analysis of documented social, mental health, and medical needs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 181 patients, representing approximately 0.4% of the ED patient population, 149 (82.3%) were frequent ED users, with a median of 14 ED visits annually (IQR 8-21), while the rest were referred by ED staff (median 2 visits (1-4.25). The majority were non-Hispanic Black (159, 87.8%) and publicly insured (163, 90.0%). The most common needs were related to housing instability (116, 64.1%) and limited access to outpatient care (112, 61.9%). Latent class analysis revealed four distinct subgroups, all of which included limited access to outpatient care: 1) primarily limited access to outpatient care (40, 22.1%); 2) housing instability and other basic needs (27, 14.9%); 3) housing instability, psychotic disorders, other basic needs, and inability to live independently (23, 12.7%); and 4) housing instability, substance use, and psychotic disorders (91, 50.3%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This analysis identified four distinct need-based subgroups of frequent ED users, suggesting the need for tailored, multifaceted interventions. Housing instability, psychiatric illness, substance use, and outpatient care access were prevalent across groups, underscoring the importance of including resources for these basic needs in any programs developed for this population. Findings support prioritizing coordinated care models, particularly those that incorporate housing, behavioral health, substance use resources, and navigation support, for this vulnerable population.</p>","PeriodicalId":23682,"journal":{"name":"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"27 5","pages":"1180-1188"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13660590/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.58307","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Frequent emergency department (ED) users, particularly those with high rates of use, often experience complex social determinants of health (SDOH) that contribute to their repeated visits and may lead to adverse health outcomes. Our objective in this study was to characterize the needs most commonly affecting this population, which may support the creation of tailored interventions with a higher chance of success.

Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of patients evaluated by an ED social medicine team in a large urban academic ED from May 2021-December 2023. Patients were identified either via frequent ED use (patients with the 10 highest number of visits each month) or referred by ED staff. We assigned 11 categories of medical, mental health, and social needs through chart review and team documentation. The primary outcome was the identification of distinct need-based subgroups among patients with high ED use, using latent class analysis of documented social, mental health, and medical needs.

Results: Of the 181 patients, representing approximately 0.4% of the ED patient population, 149 (82.3%) were frequent ED users, with a median of 14 ED visits annually (IQR 8-21), while the rest were referred by ED staff (median 2 visits (1-4.25). The majority were non-Hispanic Black (159, 87.8%) and publicly insured (163, 90.0%). The most common needs were related to housing instability (116, 64.1%) and limited access to outpatient care (112, 61.9%). Latent class analysis revealed four distinct subgroups, all of which included limited access to outpatient care: 1) primarily limited access to outpatient care (40, 22.1%); 2) housing instability and other basic needs (27, 14.9%); 3) housing instability, psychotic disorders, other basic needs, and inability to live independently (23, 12.7%); and 4) housing instability, substance use, and psychotic disorders (91, 50.3%).

Conclusion: This analysis identified four distinct need-based subgroups of frequent ED users, suggesting the need for tailored, multifaceted interventions. Housing instability, psychiatric illness, substance use, and outpatient care access were prevalent across groups, underscoring the importance of including resources for these basic needs in any programs developed for this population. Findings support prioritizing coordinated care models, particularly those that incorporate housing, behavioral health, substance use resources, and navigation support, for this vulnerable population.

识别急诊科超级用户的社会需求趋势:潜在类别分析。
频繁急诊科(ED)使用者,特别是使用率高的人,经常经历复杂的健康社会决定因素(SDOH),导致他们反复就诊,并可能导致不良的健康结果。我们在这项研究中的目标是描述影响这一人群的最常见需求,这可能支持创建具有更高成功率的量身定制干预措施。方法:回顾性分析了2021年5月至2023年12月在一家大型城市学术急诊科由急诊科社会医学团队评估的患者。通过频繁使用急诊科(每月访问次数最高的10名患者)或由急诊科工作人员介绍确定患者。我们通过图表审查和团队文档划分了11类医疗、心理健康和社会需求。主要结果是通过对记录的社会、心理健康和医疗需求进行潜在分类分析,在ED使用率高的患者中确定不同的基于需求的亚组。结果:在181例患者中,约占ED患者总数的0.4%,其中149例(82.3%)经常使用ED,每年平均14次就诊(IQR 8-21),其余患者由ED工作人员转诊(平均2次就诊(1-4.25))。大多数是非西班牙裔黑人(159人,87.8%)和公共保险(163人,90.0%)。最常见的需求与住房不稳定(116人,64.1%)和门诊服务有限(112人,61.9%)有关。潜类分析揭示了四个不同的亚组,所有这些亚组都包括门诊服务受限:1)主要是门诊服务受限(40.22.1%);2)住房不稳定和其他基本需求(27,14.9%);3)住房不稳定、精神障碍、其他基本需求和无法独立生活(23,12.7%);4)住房不稳定、物质使用和精神障碍(91,50.3%)。结论:该分析确定了频繁ED使用者的四个不同的基于需求的亚组,表明需要量身定制的,多方面的干预措施。住房不稳定、精神疾病、药物使用和门诊治疗在各群体中普遍存在,强调了在为这一人群制定的任何计划中包括这些基本需求的资源的重要性。研究结果支持优先协调护理模式,特别是那些将住房、行为健康、物质使用资源和导航支持结合起来的模式,以帮助这些弱势群体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Western Journal of Emergency Medicine
Western Journal of Emergency Medicine Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
125
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: WestJEM focuses on how the systems and delivery of emergency care affects health, health disparities, and health outcomes in communities and populations worldwide, including the impact of social conditions on the composition of patients seeking care in emergency departments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书