Effects of extracorporeal shockwave therapy on pain intensity and functional disability in chronic low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Renata Anddresa Stachelski, Márcia Rosângela Buzanello, Gladson Ricardo Flor Bertolini, Alberito Rodrigo de Carvalho
{"title":"Effects of extracorporeal shockwave therapy on pain intensity and functional disability in chronic low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Renata Anddresa Stachelski, Márcia Rosângela Buzanello, Gladson Ricardo Flor Bertolini, Alberito Rodrigo de Carvalho","doi":"10.1080/09638288.2026.2744806","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the effects of extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) on pain intensity and functional disability in individuals with chronic low back pain (CLBP).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, LILACS, Google Scholar, and ProQuest were searched. The PICOS framework included individuals with CLBP receiving ESWT, compared with placebo, usual care, exercise, or physiotherapy. Randomized controlled trials reporting pain intensity and/or functional disability were included. Data on participant characteristics, interventions, comparators, and ESWT dosimetry were extracted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 430 records identified, nine randomized controlled trials were included. Radial ESWT (rESWT) significantly reduced pain (SMD = -0.72; 95% CI -1.30 to -0.14; I<sup>2</sup> = 76%), whereas focused ESWT (fESWT) showed benefit in one trial. Functional disability significantly improved overall (MD = -6.12; 95% CI -10.02 to -2.22; I<sup>2</sup> = 75%), but the effect did not reach the minimal clinically important difference. Most studies evaluated outcomes only immediately post-intervention. Sensitivity analyses indicated influence of methodological quality and heterogeneity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ESWT, particularly rESWT, may reduce pain in CLBP, but functional improvements are not clinically meaningful. Short follow-up and substantial heterogeneity limit the strength of recommendations. rESWT and fESWT should not be considered interchangeable.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration number: </strong>International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) under the registration number CRD420251085206.</p>","PeriodicalId":50575,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1-18"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2026.2744806","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the effects of extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) on pain intensity and functional disability in individuals with chronic low back pain (CLBP).

Materials and methods: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, LILACS, Google Scholar, and ProQuest were searched. The PICOS framework included individuals with CLBP receiving ESWT, compared with placebo, usual care, exercise, or physiotherapy. Randomized controlled trials reporting pain intensity and/or functional disability were included. Data on participant characteristics, interventions, comparators, and ESWT dosimetry were extracted.

Results: Of 430 records identified, nine randomized controlled trials were included. Radial ESWT (rESWT) significantly reduced pain (SMD = -0.72; 95% CI -1.30 to -0.14; I2 = 76%), whereas focused ESWT (fESWT) showed benefit in one trial. Functional disability significantly improved overall (MD = -6.12; 95% CI -10.02 to -2.22; I2 = 75%), but the effect did not reach the minimal clinically important difference. Most studies evaluated outcomes only immediately post-intervention. Sensitivity analyses indicated influence of methodological quality and heterogeneity.

Conclusion: ESWT, particularly rESWT, may reduce pain in CLBP, but functional improvements are not clinically meaningful. Short follow-up and substantial heterogeneity limit the strength of recommendations. rESWT and fESWT should not be considered interchangeable.

Systematic review registration number: International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) under the registration number CRD420251085206.

体外冲击波治疗对慢性腰痛疼痛强度和功能障碍的影响:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。
目的:评价体外冲击波治疗(ESWT)对慢性腰痛(CLBP)患者疼痛强度和功能障碍的影响。资料和方法:检索PubMed、Embase、Web of Science、Cochrane Library、LILACS、谷歌Scholar、ProQuest。PICOS框架包括接受ESWT的CLBP患者,与安慰剂、常规护理、运动或物理治疗进行比较。包括报告疼痛强度和/或功能障碍的随机对照试验。提取了参与者特征、干预措施、比较物和ESWT剂量测定的数据。结果:在430个记录中,纳入了9个随机对照试验。径向ESWT (rESWT)显著减轻疼痛(SMD = -0.72; 95% CI -1.30至-0.14;I2 = 76%),而聚焦ESWT (fESWT)在一项试验中显示出益处。整体功能障碍显著改善(MD = -6.12; 95% CI = -10.02 ~ -2.22; I2 = 75%),但效果未达到最小的临床重要差异。大多数研究仅评估干预后立即的结果。敏感性分析显示了方法学质量和异质性的影响。结论:ESWT,特别是rESWT可减轻CLBP患者的疼痛,但功能改善无临床意义。随访时间短,异质性大,限制了建议的效力。rESWT和fESWT不应该被认为是可互换的。系统评价注册号:国际前瞻性系统评价注册(PROSPERO),注册号为CRD420251085206。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Disability and Rehabilitation
Disability and Rehabilitation 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
9.10%
发文量
415
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Disability and Rehabilitation along with Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology are international multidisciplinary journals which seek to encourage a better understanding of all aspects of disability and to promote rehabilitation science, practice and policy aspects of the rehabilitation process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书