Impact of Secure Electronic Health Record Chat on Physician Communication in the Emergency Department.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Michaela Go, Hasan Alshamrani, Obert Xu, Steven McGaughey
{"title":"Impact of Secure Electronic Health Record Chat on Physician Communication in the Emergency Department.","authors":"Michaela Go, Hasan Alshamrani, Obert Xu, Steven McGaughey","doi":"10.5811/westjem.53220","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Effective communication in the emergency department (ED) is essential for safe patient care. Electronic health record (EHR)-integrated secure messaging may improve communication workflows, but limited evidence exists comparing clinician satisfaction across modalities in the ED. This study evaluated physician satisfaction with an EHR-integrated secure messaging tool compared to existing communication methods for non-emergent communication.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted an electronic pre-post survey study at an urban academic ED following implementation of an EHR-integrated secure messaging tool in October 2024. The primary outcome was overall communication satisfaction pre-post implementation. We also compared nursing communication satisfaction and repeat consult order proportions. Survey domains (ease of use, efficiency, timeliness, clarity, overall satisfaction) were graded using a four-point forced-choice Likert scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Response rates were 35% (33/95) pre-implementation and 36% (34/95) post-implementation. Although face-to-face communication maintained superior clarity ratings, secure chat received significantly higher overall satisfaction than phone communication (median 3 [IQR 3-4] vs 2 [2-3], P < .001) and higher ratings than the existing consult workflow across all domains (all P ≤ .03). Overall nursing communication satisfaction shifted toward higher scores post-implementation (median 3 [3-4] vs 3 [2-3], P = .03). Repeat consult order proportion decreased from 22% to 18% (risk difference, -3.5%; 95% CI, -4.5% to -2.5%; P < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Electronic health record-integrated secure messaging demonstrated high user satisfaction among emergency physicians and may reduce repeat consultant communications. Secure chat provides a complementary communication channel in the ED setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":23682,"journal":{"name":"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"27 5","pages":"1217-1221"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13660561/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.53220","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Effective communication in the emergency department (ED) is essential for safe patient care. Electronic health record (EHR)-integrated secure messaging may improve communication workflows, but limited evidence exists comparing clinician satisfaction across modalities in the ED. This study evaluated physician satisfaction with an EHR-integrated secure messaging tool compared to existing communication methods for non-emergent communication.

Methods: We conducted an electronic pre-post survey study at an urban academic ED following implementation of an EHR-integrated secure messaging tool in October 2024. The primary outcome was overall communication satisfaction pre-post implementation. We also compared nursing communication satisfaction and repeat consult order proportions. Survey domains (ease of use, efficiency, timeliness, clarity, overall satisfaction) were graded using a four-point forced-choice Likert scale.

Results: Response rates were 35% (33/95) pre-implementation and 36% (34/95) post-implementation. Although face-to-face communication maintained superior clarity ratings, secure chat received significantly higher overall satisfaction than phone communication (median 3 [IQR 3-4] vs 2 [2-3], P < .001) and higher ratings than the existing consult workflow across all domains (all P ≤ .03). Overall nursing communication satisfaction shifted toward higher scores post-implementation (median 3 [3-4] vs 3 [2-3], P = .03). Repeat consult order proportion decreased from 22% to 18% (risk difference, -3.5%; 95% CI, -4.5% to -2.5%; P < .001).

Conclusion: Electronic health record-integrated secure messaging demonstrated high user satisfaction among emergency physicians and may reduce repeat consultant communications. Secure chat provides a complementary communication channel in the ED setting.

安全电子病历聊天对急诊科医师沟通的影响
简介:有效的沟通在急诊科(ED)是必不可少的安全病人护理。电子健康记录(EHR)集成的安全信息可能会改善沟通工作流程,但比较不同形式的临床医生满意度的证据有限。本研究评估了医生对EHR集成的安全信息工具的满意度,并将其与现有的非紧急通信方法进行了比较。方法:我们于2024年10月在城市学术ED实施了ehr集成安全消息传递工具后进行了电子前后调查研究。主要结果是实施前后的总体沟通满意度。我们还比较了护理沟通满意度和重复咨询订单的比例。调查领域(易用性、效率、及时性、清晰度、总体满意度)使用四分制的强迫选择李克特量表进行评分。结果:实施前有效率为35%(33/95),实施后有效率为36%(34/95)。尽管面对面沟通保持了更高的清晰度评级,但安全聊天的总体满意度明显高于电话沟通(中位数为3 [IQR 3-4] vs 2 [2-3], P < 0.001),高于所有领域现有咨询工作流程的评级(均P≤0.03)。整体护理沟通满意度在实施后得分更高(中位数为3 [3-4]vs 3 [2-3], P = .03)。重复咨询订单比例从22%下降到18%(风险差异,-3.5%;95% CI, -4.5%至-2.5%;P < .001)。结论:电子健康记录集成安全信息显示急诊医生的用户满意度高,并可减少重复咨询通信。安全聊天在ED设置中提供了一个互补的通信通道。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Western Journal of Emergency Medicine
Western Journal of Emergency Medicine Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
125
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: WestJEM focuses on how the systems and delivery of emergency care affects health, health disparities, and health outcomes in communities and populations worldwide, including the impact of social conditions on the composition of patients seeking care in emergency departments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书